Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215 (2026)

 Well location restrictions.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 3215.  Well location restrictions.

(a)  General rule.--Wells may not be drilled within 200 feet, or, in the case of an unconventional gas well, 500 feet, measured horizontally from the vertical well bore to a building or water well, existing when the copy of the plat is mailed as required by section 3211(b) (relating to well permits) without written consent of the owner of the building or water well. Unconventional gas wells may not be drilled within 1,000 feet measured horizontally from the vertical well bore to any existing water well, surface water intake, reservoir or other  water supply extraction point used by a water purveyor without the written consent of the water purveyor. If consent is not obtained and the distance restriction would deprive the owner of the oil and gas rights of the right to produce or share in the oil or gas underlying the surface tract, the well operator shall be granted a variance from the distance restriction upon submission of a plan identifying the additional measures, facilities or practices as prescribed by the department to be employed during well site construction, drilling and operations. The variance shall include additional terms and conditions required by the department to ensure safety and protection of affected persons and property, including insurance, bonding, indemnification and technical requirements. Notwithstanding section 3211(e), if a variance request has been submitted, the department may extend its permit review period for up to 15 days upon notification to the applicant of the reasons for the extension.

(b)  Limitation.--

(1)  No well site may be prepared or well drilled within 100 feet or, in the case of an unconventional well, 300 feet from the vertical well bore or 100 feet from the edge of the well site, whichever is greater, measured horizontally from any solid blue lined stream, spring or body of water as identified on the most current 7 1/2 minute topographic quadrangle map of the United States Geological Survey.

(2)  The edge of the disturbed area associated with any unconventional well site must maintain a 100-foot setback from the edge of any solid blue lined stream, spring or body of water as identified on the most current 7 1/2 minute topographic quadrangle map of the United States Geological Survey.

(3)  No unconventional well may be drilled within 300 feet of any wetlands greater than one acre in size, and the edge of the disturbed area of any well site must maintain a 100-foot setback from the boundary of the wetlands.

(4)  The department shall waive the distance restrictions upon submission of a plan identifying additional measures, facilities or practices to be employed during well site construction, drilling and operations necessary to protect the waters of this Commonwealth. The waiver, if granted, shall include additional terms and conditions required by the department necessary to protect the waters of this Commonwealth. Notwithstanding section 3211(e), if a waiver request has been submitted, the department may extend its permit review period for up to 15 days upon notification to the applicant of the reasons for the extension.

(c)  Impact.--On making a determination on a well permit, the department shall consider the impact of the proposed well on public resources, including, but not limited to:

(1)  Publicly owned parks, forests, game lands and wildlife areas.

(2)  National or State scenic rivers.

(3)  National natural landmarks.

(4)  Habitats of rare and endangered flora and fauna and other critical communities.

(5)  Historical and archaeological sites listed on the Federal or State list of historic places.

(6)  Sources used for public drinking supplies in accordance with subsection (b).

(d)  Consideration of municipality and storage operator comments.--The department may consider the comments submitted under section 3212.1 (relating to comments by municipalities and storage operators) in making a determination on a well permit. Notwithstanding any other law, no municipality or storage operator shall have a right of appeal or other form of review from the department's decision.

(d.1)  Additional protective measures.--The department may establish additional protective measures for storage of hazardous chemicals and materials intended to be used or that have been used on an unconventional well drilling site within 750 feet of a solid blue lined stream, spring or body of water identified on the most current 7 1/2 minute topographic quadrangle map of the United States Geological Survey.

(e)  Regulation criteria.--The Environmental Quality Board shall develop by regulation criteria:

(1)  For the department to utilize for conditioning a well permit based on its impact to the public resources identified under subsection (c) and for ensuring optimal development of oil and gas resources and respecting property rights of oil and gas owners.

(2)  For appeal to the Environmental Hearing Board of a permit containing conditions imposed by the department. The regulations shall also provide that the department has the burden of proving that the conditions were necessary to protect against a probable harmful impact of the public resources.

(f)  Floodplains.--

(1)  No well site may be prepared or well drilled within any floodplain if the well site will have:

(i)  a pit or impoundment containing drilling cuttings, flowback water, produced water or hazardous materials, chemicals or wastes within the floodplain; or

(ii)  a tank containing hazardous materials, chemicals, condensate, wastes, flowback or produced water within the floodway.

(2)  A well site shall not be eligible for a floodplain restriction waiver if the well site will have a tank containing condensate, flowback or produced water within the flood fringe unless all the tanks have adequate floodproofing in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program standards and accepted engineering practices.

(3)  The department may waive restrictions upon submission of a plan that shall identify the additional measures, facilities or practices to be employed during well site construction, drilling and operations. The waiver, if granted, shall impose permit conditions necessary to protect the waters of this Commonwealth.

(4)  Best practices as determined by the department to ensure the protection of the waters of this Commonwealth must be utilized for the storage and handling of all water, chemicals, fuels, hazardous materials or solid waste on a well site located in a floodplain. The department may request that the well site operator submit a plan for the storage and handling of the materials for approval by the department and may impose conditions or amend permits to include permit conditions as are necessary to protect the environment, public health and safety.

(5)  Unless otherwise specified by the department, the boundary of the floodplain shall be as indicated on maps and flood insurance studies provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. In an area where no Federal Emergency Management Agency maps or studies have defined the boundary of the 100-year frequency floodplain, absent evidence to the contrary, the floodplain shall extend from:

(i)  any perennial stream up to 100 feet horizontally from the top of the bank of the perennial stream; or

(ii)  from any intermittent stream up to 50 feet horizontally from the top of the bank of the intermittent stream.

(g)  Applicability.--

(1)  This section shall not apply to a well proposed to be drilled on an existing well site for which at least one well permit has been issued prior to the effective date of this section.

(2)  Nothing in this section shall alter or abridge the terms of any contract, mortgage or other agreement entered into prior to the effective date of this section.

 

Special Provisions in Appendix.  See section 4(3)(iv) of Act 13 of 2012 in the appendix to this title for special provisions relating to continuation of prior law.

Cross References.  Section 3215 is referred to in sections 3211, 3212, 3212.1, 3304 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2012–2023 · leading case: Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013).
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013). · cites it 19× “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215. To put this in perspective, an acre of land (of equal dimensions) would be approximately 208 feet by 208 feet.”
Pennsylvania Indep. Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Env't Prot., 146 A.3d 820 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). · cites it 18× “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215 (text emphasis added). In Robinson Twp.”
The Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP of PA & Env't Quality Bd. of PA, 193 A.3d 447 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). · cites it 15× “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215(c) (emphasis added). In addition, Section 3215(e) provides: (e) Regulation criteria.”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 147 A.3d 536 (Pa. 2016). · cites it 3× “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(a). However, this provision allows those setback distances to be overridden, and requires the DEP to grant a permit for drilling at closer distances, without the property owners’ consent, if the “distance restriction would deprive the owner of the oil and gas…”
Marcellus Shale Coal. v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. of Pa., 185 A.3d 985 (Pa. 2018). · cites it 3× “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(c). Sections 78a.15(f) and (g) of the regulations promulgated in connection with section 3215(c) require prospective drillers to make certain notifications in circumstances where drilling may impact a public resource, thus providing DEP with a methodology for…”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 52 A.3d 463 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012). · cites it 4× “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(b) (emphasis added). Article 2, § 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides that the legislative power of the Commonwealth is vested in a General Assembly consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives.”
Pennsylvania Indep. Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Env't Prot., 135 A.3d 1118 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to the Declar *1121 atory Judgments Act, 1 PIOGA seeks a declaration from this Court “that DEP is prohibited from applying and' enforcing” the requirements of Section 3215(c) of the Act commonly known as the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Act (Act 13), 58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(c), 2…”
D. Frederick, P. Hagaman, & B. Taylor v. Allegheny Twp. ZHB v. CNX Gas Co., LLC. v. Allegheny Twp. v. J.H. Slike & A.E. Slike, Northmoreland Farms LP v. M. Golembeiwski, 196 A.3d 677 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “" The Zoning Board found, as fact, that oil and gas operations, including shale gas development, have compatibly coexisted with other uses in the Township's rural areas for many years. To issue a permit, DEP, inter alia , specifically considers the impact of oil and gas drilling…”
Keystone ReLeaf, LLC v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Health, Off. of Med. Marijuana, 186 A.3d 505 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “The association sought a declaration from this Court that DEP was prohibited from applying and enforcing the requirements of Section 3215(c) of the act commonly known as the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Act, 58 Pa.”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 96 A.3d 1104 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “Finally, because our Supreme Court found that 58 Pa.C.S. §§ 3215(b)(4) and (d), 3303 and 3304 are unconstitutional, the matter was remanded to us to determine what other parts of Act 13 are properly enjoined “upon application of severability principles.”
First Philadelphia Preparatory Charter Sch. v. Commonwealth of PA, Dep't of Educ., 179 A.3d 128 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “As for the Legislative Respondents, which PDE acknowledges, issues concerning the enforcement of the CSL are vested exclusively in the executive branch of government and not with the legislative branch.”
Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP, Aplts. (Pa. 2023). · cites it 10× “2 1 58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(c). See Act of February 14, 2012, P.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(a) — 5 cases
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215. To put this in perspective, an acre of land (of equal dimensions) would be approximately 208 feet by 208 feet.”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 147 A.3d 536 (Pa. 2016). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(a). However, this provision allows those setback distances to be overridden, and requires the DEP to grant a permit for drilling at closer distances, without the property owners’ consent, if the “distance restriction would deprive the owner of the oil and gas…”
D. Frederick, P. Hagaman, & B. Taylor v. Allegheny Twp. ZHB v. CNX Gas Co., LLC. v. Allegheny Twp. v. J.H. Slike & A.E. Slike, Northmoreland Farms LP v. M. Golembeiwski, 196 A.3d 677 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “" The Zoning Board found, as fact, that oil and gas operations, including shale gas development, have compatibly coexisted with other uses in the Township's rural areas for many years. To issue a permit, DEP, inter alia , specifically considers the impact of oil and gas drilling…”
Pennsylvania Indep. Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Env't Prot., 146 A.3d 820 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215 (text emphasis added). In Robinson Twp.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(b) — 2 cases
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215. To put this in perspective, an acre of land (of equal dimensions) would be approximately 208 feet by 208 feet.”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 52 A.3d 463 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(b) (emphasis added). Article 2, § 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides that the legislative power of the Commonwealth is vested in a General Assembly consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(b)(4) — 5 cases
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215. To put this in perspective, an acre of land (of equal dimensions) would be approximately 208 feet by 208 feet.”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 52 A.3d 463 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(b) (emphasis added). Article 2, § 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides that the legislative power of the Commonwealth is vested in a General Assembly consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives.”
Pennsylvania Indep. Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Env't Prot., 146 A.3d 820 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215 (text emphasis added). In Robinson Twp.”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 147 A.3d 536 (Pa. 2016). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(a). However, this provision allows those setback distances to be overridden, and requires the DEP to grant a permit for drilling at closer distances, without the property owners’ consent, if the “distance restriction would deprive the owner of the oil and gas…”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 96 A.3d 1104 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014). “Finally, because our Supreme Court found that 58 Pa.C.S. §§ 3215(b)(4) and (d), 3303 and 3304 are unconstitutional, the matter was remanded to us to determine what other parts of Act 13 are properly enjoined “upon application of severability principles.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(b)(l) — 2 cases
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215. To put this in perspective, an acre of land (of equal dimensions) would be approximately 208 feet by 208 feet.”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 147 A.3d 536 (Pa. 2016). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(a). However, this provision allows those setback distances to be overridden, and requires the DEP to grant a permit for drilling at closer distances, without the property owners’ consent, if the “distance restriction would deprive the owner of the oil and gas…”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(c) — 9 cases
Pennsylvania Indep. Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Env't Prot., 146 A.3d 820 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215 (text emphasis added). In Robinson Twp.”
The Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP of PA & Env't Quality Bd. of PA, 193 A.3d 447 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215(c) (emphasis added). In addition, Section 3215(e) provides: (e) Regulation criteria.”
Pennsylvania Indep. Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Env't Prot., 135 A.3d 1118 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015). “Pursuant to the Declar *1121 atory Judgments Act, 1 PIOGA seeks a declaration from this Court “that DEP is prohibited from applying and' enforcing” the requirements of Section 3215(c) of the Act commonly known as the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Act (Act 13), 58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(c), 2…”
Marcellus Shale Coal. v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. of Pa., 185 A.3d 985 (Pa. 2018). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(c). Sections 78a.15(f) and (g) of the regulations promulgated in connection with section 3215(c) require prospective drillers to make certain notifications in circumstances where drilling may impact a public resource, thus providing DEP with a methodology for…”
Keystone ReLeaf, LLC v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Health, Off. of Med. Marijuana, 186 A.3d 505 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “The association sought a declaration from this Court that DEP was prohibited from applying and enforcing the requirements of Section 3215(c) of the act commonly known as the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Act, 58 Pa.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(c)(1) — 2 cases
Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP, Aplts. (Pa. 2023). “2 1 58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(c). See Act of February 14, 2012, P.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(c)(4) — 1 case
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(c)(5) — 1 case
Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP, Aplts. (Pa. 2023). “2 1 58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(c). See Act of February 14, 2012, P.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(d) — 6 cases
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215. To put this in perspective, an acre of land (of equal dimensions) would be approximately 208 feet by 208 feet.”
The Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP of PA & Env't Quality Bd. of PA, 193 A.3d 447 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215(c) (emphasis added). In addition, Section 3215(e) provides: (e) Regulation criteria.”
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 96 A.3d 1104 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014). “Finally, because our Supreme Court found that 58 Pa.C.S. §§ 3215(b)(4) and (d), 3303 and 3304 are unconstitutional, the matter was remanded to us to determine what other parts of Act 13 are properly enjoined “upon application of severability principles.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(e) — 5 cases
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215. To put this in perspective, an acre of land (of equal dimensions) would be approximately 208 feet by 208 feet.”
The Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP of PA & Env't Quality Bd. of PA, 193 A.3d 447 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215(c) (emphasis added). In addition, Section 3215(e) provides: (e) Regulation criteria.”
Pennsylvania Indep. Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Env't Prot., 146 A.3d 820 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215 (text emphasis added). In Robinson Twp.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(e)(1) — 3 cases
Marcellus Shale Coal. v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. of Pa., 185 A.3d 985 (Pa. 2018). “58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(c). Sections 78a.15(f) and (g) of the regulations promulgated in connection with section 3215(c) require prospective drillers to make certain notifications in circumstances where drilling may impact a public resource, thus providing DEP with a methodology for…”
The Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP of PA & Env't Quality Bd. of PA, 193 A.3d 447 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215(c) (emphasis added). In addition, Section 3215(e) provides: (e) Regulation criteria.”
Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP, Aplts. (Pa. 2023). “2 1 58 Pa.C.S. § 3215(c). See Act of February 14, 2012, P.”
— 58 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3215(e)(2) — 2 cases
Robinson Twp. v. Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901 (Pa. 2013). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215. To put this in perspective, an acre of land (of equal dimensions) would be approximately 208 feet by 208 feet.”
The Marcellus Shale Coalition v. DEP of PA & Env't Quality Bd. of PA, 193 A.3d 447 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2018). “58 Pa. C.S. § 3215(c) (emphasis added). In addition, Section 3215(e) provides: (e) Regulation criteria.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.