Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4503 (2026)

 Prohibited activities.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 4503.  Prohibited activities.

(a)  Bid-rigging unlawful.--It is unlawful for any person to conspire, collude or combine with another in order to commit or attempt to commit bid-rigging involving:

(1)  A contract for the purchase of equipment, goods, services or materials or for construction or repair let or to be let by a government agency.

(2)  A subcontract for the purchase of equipment, goods, services or materials or for construction or repair with a prime contractor or proposed prime contractor for a government agency.

(b)  Simultaneous bids.--Notwithstanding other provisions of this chapter, it is not unlawful for the same person to simultaneously submit bids for the same work, or a portion thereof, as a proposed prime contractor and subcontractor.

(c)  Fines and imprisonment.--Any person who violates this section commits a felony of the third degree and shall, upon conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine of not more than $1,000,000 if an entity other than an individual or a fine of not more than $50,000 if an individual or to serve a term of imprisonment for not more than three years, or both.

(d)  Alternative civil penalty.--In lieu of criminal prosecution for violation of this section, the Attorney General may bring an action for a civil penalty. In this action, a person found by a court to have violated this section shall be liable for a civil penalty of not more than $100,000.

(e)  Disposition of fines and penalties.--Criminal fines and civil penalties collected under subsections (c) and (d) shall be paid into the State Treasury and deposited in the appropriate fund.

(f)  Factors to be considered in determining fines, imprisonment or civil penalties.--In determining the appropriate sanctions to be imposed for a violation of this section, the court shall consider at least the following three factors:

(1)  The prior record and the number of previous violations.

(2)  The net worth of the person.

(3)  The size and amount of the contract involved.

(g)  Civil action not barred.--A conviction or civil penalty imposed under this section shall not bar a government agency from pursuing additional civil action and administrative sanctions.

(h)  Limitation on prosecution.--No criminal prosecution under this section shall be brought against a person who has been previously charged by information or indictment with a criminal violation of the Federal antitrust laws, based upon the same allegedly unlawful conduct upon which a criminal prosecution under this chapter could be based, where jeopardy has attached under the Federal prosecution.

 

Cross References.  Section 4503 is referred to in sections 4504, 4505, 4508, 4509 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2003–2016 · leading case: Brimmeier v. Pennsylvania Tpk. Comm'n, 147 A.3d 954 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016).
Brimmeier v. Pennsylvania Tpk. Comm'n, 147 A.3d 954 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). “The AG also charged him with two counts (Counts 4 and 12) of violating Section 4503(a)(1) of the Commonwealth Procurement Code (Procurement Code), 62 Pa.C.S. § 4503(a)(1) (government contract bid-rigging) (F3), Id.”
Stanton-Negley Drug Co. v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 943 A.2d 377 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “62 Pa.C.S. § 4503(a). (Emphasis added.) The Antibid-Rigging Act defines “bid-rigging” as: The concerted activity of two or more persons to determine in advance the winning bidder of a contract let or to be let for competitive bidding by a government agency.”
Williams v. Jt. Operating Comm. of the Clearfield Cnty. Vocational-Technical Sch., 824 A.2d 1233 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003). “§ 4503(a) provides in part: “It is unlawful for any person to conspire, collude or combine with another in order to commit or attempt to commit bid-rigging involving: (1) A contract for the purchase of equipment, goods, services or materials or for construction or repair let or…”
Williams v. JOC OF CCVTS, 824 A.2d 1233 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003). “[6] Section 4503(a) of the Antibid-Rigging Act, 62 Pa.C.S. § 4503(a) provides in part: "It is unlawful for any person to conspire, collude or combine with another in order to commit or attempt to commit bid-rigging involving: (1) A contract for the purchase of equipment, goods,…”
— 62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4503(a) — 3 cases
Stanton-Negley Drug Co. v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 943 A.2d 377 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008). “62 Pa.C.S. § 4503(a). (Emphasis added.) The Antibid-Rigging Act defines “bid-rigging” as: The concerted activity of two or more persons to determine in advance the winning bidder of a contract let or to be let for competitive bidding by a government agency.”
Williams v. Jt. Operating Comm. of the Clearfield Cnty. Vocational-Technical Sch., 824 A.2d 1233 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003). “§ 4503(a) provides in part: “It is unlawful for any person to conspire, collude or combine with another in order to commit or attempt to commit bid-rigging involving: (1) A contract for the purchase of equipment, goods, services or materials or for construction or repair let or…”
Williams v. JOC OF CCVTS, 824 A.2d 1233 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003). “[6] Section 4503(a) of the Antibid-Rigging Act, 62 Pa.C.S. § 4503(a) provides in part: "It is unlawful for any person to conspire, collude or combine with another in order to commit or attempt to commit bid-rigging involving: (1) A contract for the purchase of equipment, goods,…”
— 62 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4503(a)(1) — 1 case
Brimmeier v. Pennsylvania Tpk. Comm'n, 147 A.3d 954 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). “The AG also charged him with two counts (Counts 4 and 12) of violating Section 4503(a)(1) of the Commonwealth Procurement Code (Procurement Code), 62 Pa.C.S. § 4503(a)(1) (government contract bid-rigging) (F3), Id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.