Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7502.1 (2026)

  Supersession.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 7502.1.  Supersession.

(a)  Regulations.--Regulations pertaining to messengers and agents regarding the amount of a bond, hearings, written warnings, suspensions, revocations or fines shall not apply to messengers and agents who enter into contracts with the department to provide messenger or agent services.

(b)  Previous authorization.--Any certificate of authorization previously issued to a person to provide messenger or agent services shall be invalid 30 days after the effective date of this section.

(c)  Commonwealth employees ineligible.--No official or employee of the Commonwealth shall be eligible to enter into a contract with the department to own or operate a messenger or agent service nor shall a messenger or agent service employ an official or employee of the Commonwealth. Nothing in this subsection prohibits the department from entering into an agreement with another government agency to allow the agency to provide agent services for its own use.

(Dec. 9, 2002, P.L.1278, No.152)

 

2002 Amendment.  Act 152 added section 7502.1, effective in six months as to subsecs. (a) and (c) and two years as to subsec. (b).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Moore v. Dep't of Transp., 989 A.2d 49 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010).
Moore v. Dep't of Transp., 989 A.2d 49 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010). “1 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 7502.1, now states “Regulations pertaining to messengers and agents regarding the amount of a bond, hearings, written warnings, suspensions, revocations or fines shall not apply to messengers and agents who enter into contracts with the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.