R.I. Gen. Laws
Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-10 (2026)

Resisting legal or illegal arrest

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to use force or any weapon in resisting a legal or an illegal arrest by a peace officer, if the person has reasonable ground to believe that he or she is being arrested and that the arrest is being made by a peace officer.

(b) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500) or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by both fine and imprisonment.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1967–2025 · leading case: State v. Mendoza, 889 A.2d 153 (R.I. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Mendoza, 889 A.2d 153 (R.I. 2005). · cites it 4× “01(C)(1)(b), 1 and resisting arrest in violation of G.L.1956 § 12-7-10. After a jury trial on February 18, 2000, defendant was found guilty on all four counts.”
State v. Wiegmann, 714 A.2d 841 (Md. 1998). · cites it 2× “§ 505(b)(1)(i) (West 1983); R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-10(a) (1994); S.C.Code Ann.”
Petro v. Town of West Warwick ex rel. Moore, 889 F. Supp. 2d 292 (D.R.I. 2012). · cites it 4× “” R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-10(a). Defendants’ arguments with respect to resisting arrest are unpersuasive.”
State v. Hanes, 783 A.2d 920 (R.I. 2001). · cites it 2× “1956 § 11-47-8; and for resisting arrest, in violation of G.L.1956 § 12-7-10. At trial, the state’s witnesses and defendant presented various, conflicting accounts of the deadly encounter between defendant and Jamel.”
State v. Albanese, 970 A.2d 1215 (R.I. 2009). · cites it 2× “I Facts and Travel On November 22, 2003, the Narragansett Police Department filed a criminal complaint against defendant, charging her with one count of simple assault and/or battery in violation of § 11-5-3, 1 and one count of resisting arrest in violation of G.L.1956 §…”
State v. Ramsdell, 285 A.2d 399 (R.I. 1971). · cites it 4× “However, this right was abolished in Rhode Island not by the enactment of §11-5-5, the assault felony statute, in 1965 but by the passage of an act in 1941 (now cited as §12-7-10) which makes it unlawful to forceably resist an illegal arrest if such person has reasonable grounds…”
State v. Crudup, 842 A.2d 1069 (R.I. 2004). · cites it 2× “1956 § 11-47-3, possession of a firearm without a license in violation of § 11-47-8, resisting arrest in violation of G.L.1956 § 12-7-10, and unlawful possession of a stolen firearm in violation of G.”
State v. Hurteau, 810 A.2d 222 (R.I. 2002). · cites it 2× “Under G.L. 1956 § 12-7-10, an arrestee must “submit peacefully and, if he has been unlawfully arrested, * * * pursue his remedy in the courts.”
State v. Gelinas, 417 A.2d 1381 (R.I. 1980). · cites it 2× “” *1385 General Laws 1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 12-7-10 requires an arrestee to submit peacefully and, if he has been unlawfully arrested, to pursue his remedy in the courts.”
State v. Hobson, 577 N.W.2d 825 (Wis. 1998). · cites it 2× “§ 505(b)(1)(i) (1983); R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-10 (1994); S.D. Codified Laws Ann.”
Glenn v. State, 849 S.E.2d 409 (Ga. 2020). “§ 30-22-1 (B); R.I. Gen. Laws Ann. § 12-7-10 (a); S.D. Codified Laws §§ 22-11-4 ; 22-11-5.”
State v. Ana M. Cruz, 109 A.3d 381 (R.I. 2015). · cites it 3× “Cruz, appeals from a Superior Court judgment of conviction, having been found guilty on two counts: (1) resisting arrest in violation of G.L.1956 § 12-7-10; and (2) disorderly conduct in violation of G.”
Show all 37 citing cases →
R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-10(a): 3 cases
State v. Wiegmann, 714 A.2d 841 (Md. 1998). “§ 505(b)(1)(i) (West 1983); R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-10(a) (1994); S.C.Code Ann.”
Petro v. Town of West Warwick ex rel. Moore, 889 F. Supp. 2d 292 (D.R.I. 2012). “” R.I. Gen. Laws § 12-7-10(a). Defendants’ arguments with respect to resisting arrest are unpersuasive.”
State v. Mendoza, 889 A.2d 153 (R.I. 2005). “01(C)(1)(b), 1 and resisting arrest in violation of G.L.1956 § 12-7-10. After a jury trial on February 18, 2000, defendant was found guilty on all four counts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.