R.I. Gen. Laws
Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19 (2026)

Additional compensation for specific injuries

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)(1) In case of the following specified injuries there shall be paid in addition to all other compensation provided for in chapters 29 — 38 of this title a weekly payment equal to one-half (½) of the average weekly earnings of the injured employee, but in no case more than ninety dollars ($90.00) nor less than forty-five dollars ($45.00) per week. In case of the following specified injuries that occur on or after January 1, 2012, there shall be paid in addition to all other compensation provided for in chapters 29 — 38 of this title a weekly payment equal to one-half (½) of the average weekly earnings of the injured employee, but in no case more than one hundred eighty dollars ($180) nor less than ninety dollars ($90.00) per week. Payment made under this section shall be made in a one-time payment unless the parties otherwise agree. Payment shall be mailed within fourteen (14) days of the entry of a decree, order, or agreement of the parties:

(i) For the loss by severance of both hands at or above the wrist, or for the loss of the arm at or above the elbow or for the loss of the leg at or above the knee, or both feet at or above the ankle, or of one hand and one foot, or the entire and irrecoverable loss of the sight of both eyes, or the reduction to one-tenth (1/10) or less of normal vision with glasses, for a period of three hundred twelve (312) weeks; provided, that for the purpose of this chapter the Snellen chart reading (20/200) shall equal one-tenth (1/10) of normal vision or a reduction of ninety percent (90%) of the vision. Additionally, any loss of visual performance including, but not limited to, loss of binocular vision, other than direct visual acuity may be considered in evaluating eye loss;

(ii) For the loss by severance of either arm at or above the elbow, or of either leg at or above the knee, for a period of three hundred twelve (312) weeks;

(iii) For the loss by severance of either hand at or above the wrist for a period of two hundred forty-four (244) weeks;

(iv) For the entire and irrecoverable loss of sight of either eye, or the reduction to one-tenth (1/10) or less of normal vision with glasses, or for loss of binocular vision for a period of one hundred sixty (160) weeks;

(v) For the loss by severance of either foot at or above the ankle, for a period of two hundred five (205) weeks;

(vi) For the loss by severance of the entire distal phalange of either thumb for a period of thirty-five (35) weeks; and for the loss by severance at or above the second joint of either thumb, for a period of seventy-five (75) weeks;

(vii) For the loss by severance of one phalange of either index finger, for a period of twenty-five (25) weeks; for the loss by severance of at least two (2) phalanges of either index finger, for a period of thirty-two (32) weeks; for the loss by severance of at least three (3) phalanges of either index finger, for a period of forty-six (46) weeks;

(viii) For the loss by severance of one phalange of the second finger of either hand, for a period of sixteen (16) weeks; for the loss by severance of two (2) phalanges of the second finger of either hand, for a period of twenty-two (22) weeks; for the loss by severance of three (3) phalanges of the second finger on either hand, for a period of thirty (30) weeks;

(ix) For the loss by severance of one phalange of the third finger of either hand, for a period of twelve (12) weeks; for the loss by severance of two (2) phalanges of the third finger of either hand, for a period of eighteen (18) weeks; for the loss by severance of three (3) phalanges of a third finger of either hand, for a period of twenty-five (25) weeks;

(x) For the loss by severance of one phalange of the fourth finger of either hand, for a period of ten (10) weeks; for the loss by severance of two (2) phalanges of the fourth finger of either hand, for a period of fourteen (14) weeks; for the loss by severance of three (3) phalanges of a fourth finger of either hand, for a period of twenty (20) weeks;

(xi) For the loss by severance of one phalange of the big toe on either foot, for a period of twenty (20) weeks; for the loss by severance of two (2) phalanges of the big toe of either foot, for a period of thirty-eight (38) weeks; for the loss by severance at or above the distal joint of any other toe than the big toe, for a period of ten (10) weeks for each such toe;

(xii) For partial loss by severance for any of the injuries specified in paragraphs (1)(i) — (1)(xi) of this subsection, proportionate benefits shall be paid for the period of time that the partial loss by severance bears to the total loss by severance.

(2) Where any bodily member or portion of it has been rendered permanently stiff or useless, compensation in accordance with the above schedule shall be paid as if the member or portion of it had been completely severed; provided, that if the stiffness or uselessness is less than total, then compensation shall be paid for that period of weeks in proportion to the applicable period where the member or portion of it has been completely severed as the instant percentage of stiffness or uselessness bears to the total stiffness or total uselessness of the bodily members or portion of them.

(3) In case of the following specified injuries there shall be paid in addition to all other compensation provided for in chapters 29 — 38 under this title a weekly payment equal to one-half (½) of the average weekly earnings of the injured employee, but in no case more than ninety dollars ($90.00) nor less than forty-five dollars ($45.00) per week. Payment under this subsection shall be made in a one-time payment unless the parties otherwise agree. Payment shall be mailed within fourteen (14) days of the entry of a decree, order, or agreement of the parties:

(i) For permanent disfigurement of the body the number of weeks may not exceed five hundred (500) weeks, which sum shall be payable in a one-time payment within fourteen (14) days of the entry of a decree, order, or agreement of the parties in addition to all other sums under this section wherever it is applicable.

(4)(i) Loss of hearing due to industrial noise is recognized as an occupational disease for purposes of chapters 29 — 38 of this title and occupational deafness is defined to be a loss of hearing in one or both ears due to prolonged exposure to harmful noise in employment. Harmful noise means sound capable of producing occupational deafness.

(ii) Hearing loss shall be evaluated pursuant to protocols established by the workers’ compensation medical advisory board. All treatment consistent with this subsection shall be consistent with the protocols established by the workers’ compensation medical advisory board subject to § 28-33-5.

(iii) If the employer has conducted baseline screenings within one (1) year of exposure to harmful noise to evaluate the extent of an employee’s preexisting hearing loss, the causative factor shall be apportioned based on the employee’s preexisting hearing loss and subsequent occupational hearing loss, and the compensation payable to the employee shall only be that portion of the compensation related to the present work-related exposure.

(iv) There shall be payable as permanent partial disability for total occupational deafness of one ear, seventy-five (75) weeks of compensation; for total occupational deafness of both ears, two hundred forty-four (244) weeks of compensation; for partial occupational deafness in one or both ears, compensation shall be paid for any periods that are proportionate to the relation that the hearing loss bears to the amount provided in this subdivision for total loss of hearing in one or both ears, as the case may be. For the complete loss of hearing for either ear due to external trauma or by other mechanism, acuity loss shall be paid pursuant to this subsection.

(v) No benefits shall be granted for tinnitus, psychogenic hearing loss, congenital hearing loss, recruitment, or hearing loss above three thousand (3,000) hertz.

(vi) The provisions of this subsection and the amendments insofar as applicable to hearing loss shall be operative as to any occupational hearing loss that occurs on or after September 1, 2003, except for acuity hearing loss related to a single event which shall become effective upon passage.

(vii) If previous hearing loss, whether occupational or not, is established by an audiometric examination or other competent evidence, whether or not the employee was exposed to assessable noise exposure within one year preceding the test, the employer is not liable for the previous loss, nor is the employer liable for a loss for which compensation has previously been paid or awarded. The employer is liable only for the difference between the percent of occupational hearing loss determined as of the date of the audiometric examination conducted by a certified audiometric technician using an audiometer which meets the specifications established by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI 3.6-1969, ri973) used to determine occupational hearing loss and the percentage of loss established by the baseline audiometric examination. An amount paid to an employee for occupational hearing loss by any other employer shall be credited against compensation payable by the subject employer for the hearing loss. The employee shall not receive in the aggregate greater compensation from all employers for occupational hearing loss than that provided in this section for total occupational hearing loss. A payment shall not be paid to an employee unless the employee has worked in excessive noise exposure employment for a total period of at least one hundred eighty (180) days for the employer for whom compensation is claimed.

(viii) No claim for occupational deafness may be filed until six (6) months’ separation from the type of noisy work for the last employer in whose employment the employee was at any time during the employment exposed to harmful noise.

(ix) The total compensation due for hearing loss is recovered from the employer who last employed the employee in whose employment the employee was last exposed to harmful noise and the insurance carrier, if any, on the risk when the employee was last so exposed, and if the occupational hearing loss was contracted while the employee was in the employment of a prior employer, and there was no baseline testing by the last employer, the employer and insurance carrier that is made liable for the total compensation as provided by this section may petition the workers’ compensation court for an apportionment of the compensation among the several employers that since the contraction of the hearing loss have employed the employee in a noisy environment.

(b) Where payments are required to be made under more than one clause of this section, payments shall be made in a one-time payment unless the parties otherwise agree. Payment shall be mailed within fourteen (14) days of the entry of a decree, order, or agreement of the parties and a penalty of one hundred dollars ($100) shall be assessed for every day that the payment is delinquent.

(c) Payments pursuant to this section, except paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, shall be made only after an employee’s condition as relates to loss of use has reached maximum medical improvement as defined in § 28-29-2 and as found pursuant to § 28-33-18(b).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44 cases, 1961–2009 · leading case: Rison v. Air Filter Sys., Inc., 707 A.2d 675 (R.I. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rison v. Air Filter Sys., Inc., 707 A.2d 675 (R.I. 1998). · cites it 25× “See G.L.1956 § 28-33-19 (1956 enactment) (entitled “Additional compensation for specific injuries”); P.”
Volpe v. Stillman White Co., 415 A.2d 1034 (R.I. 1980). · cites it 18× “1956 (1968 Reenactment) § 28-33-19(n)(2) * for permanent disfigurement of his left foot.”
Thomas v. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency Fund, 814 A.2d 335 (R.I. 2003). · cites it 23× “The Appellate Division decree reversed the trial court’s dismissal of Manuel Thomas’s 1 (employee or Thomas) petition seeking payment of loss of use and disfigurement benefits pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 28-33-19. In its petition for certio-rari, the Insolvency Fund argues that the…”
Risor v. Nebraska Boiler, 765 N.W.2d 170 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 2× “Ann. §§ 34:15-35:10 to 34:15-35.22 (West 2000); N.”
Coletta v. State, 263 A.2d 681 (R.I. 1970). · cites it 6× “If he suffers a specific loss, as scheduled in §28-33-19, he is entitled to specific compensation for that loss regardless of his incapacity for work.”
Molony & Rubien Constr. Co. v. Segrella, 373 A.2d 816 (R.I. 1977). · cites it 7× “Specific compensation benefits are paid pursuant to a schedule of benefits delineated in §28-33-19. From time to time we have pointed out that these particular benefits are given without regard to whether or not the conditions or losses described in §28-33-19 have caused a loss…”
Sherry v. Crescent Co., 226 A.2d 819 (R.I. 1967). · cites it 8× “1956, §28-33-19 (d). The only question raised is whether the commission erred in fixing the amount of the award pursuant to the terms of the statute in effect in March 1961, the time the employee injured his eye.”
Tirocchi v. United States Rubber Co., 224 A.2d 387 (R.I. 1966). · cites it 5× “1956, §28-33-19, and further that the .provisions of a preliminary agreement providing specific compensation benefits for severance of the phalanges did not render .”
Jones v. Grinnell Corp., 362 A.2d 139 (R.I. 1976). · cites it 3× “Sometimes, we said, it means an incapacity for work, but when used in relation to the payment of specific compensation, it refers to a type of condition which may not necessarily result in the loss of earning capacity but which will establish the worker’s right to receive a…”
Fogarty v. State, 236 A.2d 247 (R.I. 1967). · cites it 6× “1956, §28-33-19 (m), as amended, in which an employee seeks specific benefits for the loss of use of his left hand.”
Reardon v. Hall, 247 A.2d 900 (R.I. 1968). · cites it 5× “He relies on the following language in §28-33-19, as amended: «* -x- jn cage 0f following specified injuries there shall be paid in addition to and concurrently with all other compensation provided for in chapter [s] 29 to 38, inclusive, of this title a weekly payment equal to…”
Lamont v. Aetna Bridge Co., 270 A.2d 515 (R.I. 1970). · cites it 7× “The Legislature in enacting §28-33-19 and awarding an injured workman specific compensation has seen fit to give these benefits in a variety of circumstances.”
Show all 44 citing cases →
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(1) — 4 cases
Lamont v. Aetna Bridge Co., 270 A.2d 515 (R.I. 1970). “The Legislature in enacting §28-33-19 and awarding an injured workman specific compensation has seen fit to give these benefits in a variety of circumstances.”
Beaupre v. Dynachem Corp., 324 A.2d 621 (R.I. 1974).
Thibault v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 302 A.2d 755 (R.I. 1973).
Pilkanis v. Leesona Corp., 224 A.2d 893 (R.I. 1966).
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(a) — 5 cases
Rison v. Air Filter Sys., Inc., 707 A.2d 675 (R.I. 1998). “See G.L.1956 § 28-33-19 (1956 enactment) (entitled “Additional compensation for specific injuries”); P.”
Tirocchi v. United States Rubber Co., 224 A.2d 387 (R.I. 1966). “1956, §28-33-19, and further that the .provisions of a preliminary agreement providing specific compensation benefits for severance of the phalanges did not render .”
Lacroix v. Nulco Mfg. Co., 618 A.2d 1285 (R.I. 1993).
Anderson v. O'Connell Supply, 649 A.2d 509 (R.I. 1994).
Walsh v. State Dep't of Nat. Resources, 388 A.2d 8 (R.I. 1978).
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(a)(13) — 1 case
Anderson v. O'Connell Supply, 649 A.2d 509 (R.I. 1994).
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(a)(14)(B) — 2 cases
Funk v. Indus. Comm'n, 808 P.2d 827 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991).
Lacroix v. Nulco Mfg. Co., 618 A.2d 1285 (R.I. 1993).
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(a)(2) — 1 case
Thomas v. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency Fund, 814 A.2d 335 (R.I. 2003). “The Appellate Division decree reversed the trial court’s dismissal of Manuel Thomas’s 1 (employee or Thomas) petition seeking payment of loss of use and disfigurement benefits pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 28-33-19. In its petition for certio-rari, the Insolvency Fund argues that the…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(a)(4) — 2 cases
Risor v. Nebraska Boiler, 765 N.W.2d 170 (Neb. 2009). “Ann. §§ 34:15-35:10 to 34:15-35.22 (West 2000); N.”
Anderson v. O'Connell Supply, 649 A.2d 509 (R.I. 1994).
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(a)(l) — 1 case
Anderson v. O'Connell Supply, 649 A.2d 509 (R.I. 1994).
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(b) — 1 case
Thomas v. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency Fund, 814 A.2d 335 (R.I. 2003). “The Appellate Division decree reversed the trial court’s dismissal of Manuel Thomas’s 1 (employee or Thomas) petition seeking payment of loss of use and disfigurement benefits pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 28-33-19. In its petition for certio-rari, the Insolvency Fund argues that the…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(c) — 2 cases
Molony & Rubien Constr. Co. v. Segrella, 373 A.2d 816 (R.I. 1977). “Specific compensation benefits are paid pursuant to a schedule of benefits delineated in §28-33-19. From time to time we have pointed out that these particular benefits are given without regard to whether or not the conditions or losses described in §28-33-19 have caused a loss…”
Rison v. Air Filter Sys., Inc., 707 A.2d 675 (R.I. 1998). “See G.L.1956 § 28-33-19 (1956 enactment) (entitled “Additional compensation for specific injuries”); P.”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(d) — 2 cases
Coletta v. State, 263 A.2d 681 (R.I. 1970). “If he suffers a specific loss, as scheduled in §28-33-19, he is entitled to specific compensation for that loss regardless of his incapacity for work.”
Walsh v. State Dep't of Nat. Resources, 388 A.2d 8 (R.I. 1978).
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(m) — 7 cases
Molony & Rubien Constr. Co. v. Segrella, 373 A.2d 816 (R.I. 1977). “Specific compensation benefits are paid pursuant to a schedule of benefits delineated in §28-33-19. From time to time we have pointed out that these particular benefits are given without regard to whether or not the conditions or losses described in §28-33-19 have caused a loss…”
Thomas v. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency Fund, 814 A.2d 335 (R.I. 2003). “The Appellate Division decree reversed the trial court’s dismissal of Manuel Thomas’s 1 (employee or Thomas) petition seeking payment of loss of use and disfigurement benefits pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 28-33-19. In its petition for certio-rari, the Insolvency Fund argues that the…”
Fogarty v. State, 236 A.2d 247 (R.I. 1967). “1956, §28-33-19 (m), as amended, in which an employee seeks specific benefits for the loss of use of his left hand.”
Thibault v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 302 A.2d 755 (R.I. 1973).
Tirocchi v. United States Rubber Co., 224 A.2d 387 (R.I. 1966). “1956, §28-33-19, and further that the .provisions of a preliminary agreement providing specific compensation benefits for severance of the phalanges did not render .”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(n) — 1 case
Funk v. Indus. Comm'n, 808 P.2d 827 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991).
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-33-19(n)(2) — 4 cases
Volpe v. Stillman White Co., 415 A.2d 1034 (R.I. 1980). “1956 (1968 Reenactment) § 28-33-19(n)(2) * for permanent disfigurement of his left foot.”
Thomas v. Rhode Island Insurers' Insolvency Fund, 814 A.2d 335 (R.I. 2003). “The Appellate Division decree reversed the trial court’s dismissal of Manuel Thomas’s 1 (employee or Thomas) petition seeking payment of loss of use and disfigurement benefits pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 28-33-19. In its petition for certio-rari, the Insolvency Fund argues that the…”
Donahue v. Washburn Wire Co., 492 A.2d 152 (R.I. 1985).
Rainville v. King's Trucking Co., Inc., 448 A.2d 733 (R.I. 1982).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.