Rhode Island General Laws

R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-48-1 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section RI-LEGwebserver.rilegislature.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, the following words and terms have the following meanings:

(1) “Director” means the director of the department of labor and training.

(2) “Employee” means any full-time employee who works an average of thirty (30) or more hours per week.

(3) “Employer” means and includes:

(i) Any person, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or other business entity who or that employs fifty (50) or more employees;

(ii) The state of Rhode Island, including the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and any state department or agency that employs any employees;

(iii) Any city or town or municipal agency that employs thirty (30) or more employees; and

(iv) Any person who acts directly or indirectly in the interest of any employer.

(4) “Family leave” means leave by reason of the serious illness of a family member.

(5) “Family member” means a parent, spouse, child, mother-in-law, father-in-law, or the employee himself or herself, and with respect to employees of the state as defined in subsection (3)(ii), shall include domestic partners as defined in § 36-12-1(3).

(6) “Parental leave” means leave by reason of the birth of a child of an employee or the placement of a child sixteen (16) years of age or less with an employee in connection with the adoption of the child by the employee.

(7) “Serious illness” means a disabling physical or mental illness, injury, impairment, or condition that involves inpatient care in a hospital, a nursing home, or a hospice, or outpatient care requiring continuing treatment or supervision by a healthcare provider.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2023 · leading case: McElroy v. Fid. Invs. Institutional Servs. Co., 298 F. Supp. 3d 357 (D.R.I. 2018).
McElroy v. Fid. Invs. Institutional Servs. Co., 298 F. Supp. 3d 357 (D.R.I. 2018). · cites it 4× “Laws § 28-5-1 ; the Rhode Island Civil Rights Act ("RICRA"), R.”
Tardie v. Rehab. Hosp. of Rhode Island, 6 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D.R.I. 1998). · cites it 6× “Laws, § 28-48-1, et seq. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all counts.”
Hodgens v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 144 F.3d 151 (1st Cir. 1998). “In addition to his claims under the federal FMLA and ADA, Hodgens made similar claims under the corresponding provisions of the Rhode Island Parental and Family Medical Leave Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-48-1 et seq., and the Rhode Island Fair Employment Practices Act, R.”
Tardie v. Rehab. Hosp., 168 F.3d 538 (1st Cir. 1999). “; and (6) the Rhode Island Parental and Fami *541 ly Medical Leave Act (“PFMLA”), R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-48-1 et seq. After the close of discovery, appellees moved for summary judgment on all counts.”
Hodgens v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 963 F. Supp. 102 (D.R.I. 1997). · cites it 2× “(Count I), and the Rhode Island Parental and Family Medical Leave Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-48-1 et seq. (Count II) because it was prompted by the fact that he took sick leave to which he was entitled under those statutes; 2.”
Moran v. GTech Corp., 989 F. Supp. 84 (D.R.I. 1997). · cites it 4× “§§ 2601-2654 ; the Rhode Island Parental and Family Medical Leave Act, R.I. Gen. Laws §§ 28-48-1 to -10; the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.”
Cham v. Station Operators Inc., 832 F. Supp. 2d 131 (D.R.I. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 2601 , and the Rhode Island Parental and Family Medical Leave Act (“RIPFMLA”), R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-48-1. 5 A jury trial commenced on January 24, 2011.”
Bellisle v. Landmark Med. Ctr., 207 F. Supp. 3d 153 (D.R.I. 2016). · cites it 2× “(“RICRA”) against all the Defendants; (8) Rhode Island Parental and Family Medical Leave Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-48-1, et seq. (“RIPFMLA”) against all the Defendants; (9) intentional infliction of emotional distress against Charlene Elie and Glenn Miller; (10) tortious…”
Nelson v. City of Cranston Ex Rel. McAteer, 116 F. Supp. 2d 260 (D.R.I. 2000). · cites it 2× “Discussion A The Settlement Agreement In Count VI of the Complaint plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment declaring that the November 4, 1997 settlement agreement is void for lack of consideration and for violating both the FMLA, 29 U.”
Reid v. Citizens Sav. Bank/Citizens Trust Co., 887 F. Supp. 43 (D.R.I. 1995). · cites it 2× “G.L. §§ 28-48-1 to 28-48-10 (the Act). The plaintiff Lisa Reid (Reid), an employee of defendant Citizens Savings Bank (Citizens), has filed a complaint against Citizens alleging violations of the Rhode Island Act and the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.”
Santagata v. MiniLuxe, Inc (D.R.I. 2020). · cites it 2× “Laws § 28-50-1; the Rhode Island Parental and Family Medical Leave Act, R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-48-1 et seq.; and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FLMA”), 29 U.”
Ingraham v. UTGR, Inc. (D.R.I. 2022). · cites it 2× “Ingraham was employed at Twin River as a floor supervisor from November 30, 2015, until his termination on May 8, 2018. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Ingraham’s employment troubles began with a car accident in 2017 in which he suffered injuries causing him to be on medical leave from…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-48-1(4) — 1 case
Tardie v. Rehab. Hosp. of Rhode Island, 6 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D.R.I. 1998). “Laws, § 28-48-1, et seq. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all counts.”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 28-48-1(5) — 1 case
Tardie v. Rehab. Hosp. of Rhode Island, 6 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D.R.I. 1998). “Laws, § 28-48-1, et seq. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all counts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.