(a) The chief purchasing officer or his or her designee shall have authority to determine
protests and other controversies of actual or prospective bidders or offerors in connection
with the solicitation or selection for award of a contract.
(b) Any actual or prospective bidder, offeror, or contractor who is aggrieved in connection
with the solicitation or selection for award of a contract may file a protest with
the chief purchasing officer. A protest or notice of other controversy must be filed
promptly and in any event within two (2) calendar weeks after the aggrieved person
knows or should have known of the facts giving rise thereto. All protests or notices
of other controversies must be in writing.
(c) The chief purchasing officer shall promptly issue a decision in writing. A copy of
that decision shall be mailed or otherwise furnished to the aggrieved party and shall
state the reasons for the action taken.
Notes of Decisions
Bradford Assocs. v. Rhode Island Div. of Purchases, 772 A.2d 485 (R.I. 2001).
“Accordingly, § 42-35-15, the provision for judicial review of contested cases, does not apply to suspension decisions, and any exercise of jurisdiction predicated on this section by the Superior Court is invalid.”
A.F. Lusi Constr., Inc. v. Rhode Island Convention Ctr. Auth., 934 A.2d 791 (R.I. 2007).
· cites it 2× “Although G.L.1956 § 37-2-52(a) of the State Purchases Act requires aggrieved bidders to first file a protest with the chief purchasing officer, because we conclude that the State Purchases Act does not apply to defendant’s procurement of construction contracts, we need not…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 37-2-52(a) — 1 case
A.F. Lusi Constr., Inc. v. Rhode Island Convention Ctr. Auth., 934 A.2d 791 (R.I. 2007).
“Although G.L.1956 § 37-2-52(a) of the State Purchases Act requires aggrieved bidders to first file a protest with the chief purchasing officer, because we conclude that the State Purchases Act does not apply to defendant’s procurement of construction contracts, we need not…”
— R.I. Gen. Laws § 37-2-52(b) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.