.—The provisions of §4A1.2 (Definitions and Instructions for Computing Criminal History) are applicable to the counting of convictions under §4B1.1.
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Trey Campbell, 22 F.4th 438 (4th Cir. 2022).
· cites it 36× “2(b), with U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 appl. n.1. 2 Campbell also argues that his other predicate offense, a federal conviction for aiding and abetting distribution of cocaine base within 1,000 feet of a school, is not a “controlled substance offense.”
United States v. Steven L. Parson, 955 F.2d 858 (3rd Cir. 1992).
· cites it 42× “But based on Application Note 2 to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, we must conclude that the Commission did not intend to carry over any congressional distinction between crimes directed against persons and crimes directed in the first instance against property.”
United States v. Ryan William McMillan, 863 F.3d 1053 (8th Cir. 2017).
· cites it 23× “" U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a) (2015).1 Subsection one contains the force clause and subsection two contains the enumerated and residual clauses.”
United States v. Marlon Eason, 953 F.3d 1184 (11th Cir. 2020).
· cites it 16× “” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 cmt. n.1. The Guidelines nowhere define robbery.”
United States v. Austin, 426 F.3d 1266 (10th Cir. 2005).
· cites it 11× “1(a)(2) and defined under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 and its commentary. The probation officer who prepared the presentence report nonetheless recommended a base offense level increase of four levels, from 20 to 24, based on the prior Colorado conviction, which he characterized as a…”
United States v. Fernando Martinez, 821 F.3d 984 (8th Cir. 2016).
· cites it 16× “Prior to sentencing, a probation officer prepared a presentence investigation report (PSIR), which recommended the district court find Martinez to be a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 – a finding that would increase his guideline sentencing range by nine years – because…”
United States v. Travis Lamont Smith, 775 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2014).
· cites it 14× “United States establishes that state crimes are “controlled substance offense[s],” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(2) (Nov.1988), only if they are “substantially similar” to federal drug trafficking crimes.”
United States v. Peterson, 629 F.3d 432 (4th Cir. 2011).
· cites it 21× “2(a) cmt. 1, or it might be an offense that “otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another” under § 4B1.”
United States v. Thilo Brown, 868 F.3d 297 (4th Cir. 2017).
· cites it 11× “90, 91; U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a) (2002). Because the district court sentenced Petitioner on July 14, 2003, before United States v.”
United States v. Moore, 916 F.3d 231 (2d Cir. 2019).
· cites it 13× “He argues that neither federal bank robbery nor New York robbery in the third degree are crimes of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. Rejecting Moore's arguments, we AFFIRM.”
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(1) — 162 cases
United States v. Steven L. Parson, 955 F.2d 858 (3rd Cir. 1992).
“But based on Application Note 2 to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, we must conclude that the Commission did not intend to carry over any congressional distinction between crimes directed against persons and crimes directed in the first instance against property.”
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(1)(2) — 2 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(1)(i) — 26 cases
United States v. Steven L. Parson, 955 F.2d 858 (3rd Cir. 1992).
“But based on Application Note 2 to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, we must conclude that the Commission did not intend to carry over any congressional distinction between crimes directed against persons and crimes directed in the first instance against property.”
Puente, 22 I. & N. Dec. 1006 (BIA 2002).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(1)(ii) — 38 cases
United States v. Steven L. Parson, 955 F.2d 858 (3rd Cir. 1992).
“But based on Application Note 2 to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, we must conclude that the Commission did not intend to carry over any congressional distinction between crimes directed against persons and crimes directed in the first instance against property.”
Puente, 22 I. & N. Dec. 1006 (BIA 2002).
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(1)(ii)(1995) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(2) — 62 cases
United States v. Travis Lamont Smith, 775 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2014).
“United States establishes that state crimes are “controlled substance offense[s],” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(2) (Nov.1988), only if they are “substantially similar” to federal drug trafficking crimes.”
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(3) — 23 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(3)(A) — 4 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(3)(B) — 5 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(A) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(B) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a) — 1504 cases
United States v. Peterson, 629 F.3d 432 (4th Cir. 2011).
“2(a) cmt. 1, or it might be an offense that “otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another” under § 4B1.”
United States v. Ryan William McMillan, 863 F.3d 1053 (8th Cir. 2017).
“" U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a) (2015).1 Subsection one contains the force clause and subsection two contains the enumerated and residual clauses.”
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(1) — 538 cases
United States v. Moore, 916 F.3d 231 (2d Cir. 2019).
“He argues that neither federal bank robbery nor New York robbery in the third degree are crimes of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2. Rejecting Moore's arguments, we AFFIRM.”
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(2) — 970 cases
United States v. Fernando Martinez, 821 F.3d 984 (8th Cir. 2016).
“Prior to sentencing, a probation officer prepared a presentence investigation report (PSIR), which recommended the district court find Martinez to be a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 – a finding that would increase his guideline sentencing range by nine years – because…”
United States v. Thilo Brown, 868 F.3d 297 (4th Cir. 2017).
“90, 91; U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a) (2002). Because the district court sentenced Petitioner on July 14, 2003, before United States v.”
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(2)(2006) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(2)(2012) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(2006) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(2015) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(B) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(a) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(i) — 6 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(ii) — 3 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(l) — 254 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(l)(2) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(a)(l)(ii) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(b) — 800 cases
United States v. Trey Campbell, 22 F.4th 438 (4th Cir. 2022).
“2(b), with U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 appl. n.1. 2 Campbell also argues that his other predicate offense, a federal conviction for aiding and abetting distribution of cocaine base within 1,000 feet of a school, is not a “controlled substance offense.”
United States v. Travis Lamont Smith, 775 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2014).
“United States establishes that state crimes are “controlled substance offense[s],” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(2) (Nov.1988), only if they are “substantially similar” to federal drug trafficking crimes.”
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(b)(1) — 16 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(b)(2) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(b)(3)(A) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(c) — 129 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(c)(2) — 22 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(c)(3) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(c)(l) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(d) — 24 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(e) — 7 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(e)(1) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(e)(2) — 7 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(e)(3) — 10 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(e)(4) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(e)(l) — 2 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(l) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(l)(a) — 1 case
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(l)(i) — 32 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(l)(ii) — 62 cases
— U.S.S.G. §4B1.2(l)(ii)(1995) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.