U.S.S.G. § 8C2.10

Determining the Fine for Other Counts

Read at: USSCussc.gov CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For any count or counts not covered under §8C2.1 (Applicability of Fine Guidelines), the court should determine an appropriate fine by applying the provisions of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553 and 3572. The court should determine the appropriate fine amount, if any, to be imposed in addition to any fine determined under §8C2.8 (Determining the Fine Within the Range) and §8C2.9 (Disgorgement).

Commentary

Background: The Commission has not promulgated guidelines governing the setting of fines for counts not covered by §8C2.1 (Applicability of Fine Guidelines). For such counts, the court should determine the appropriate fine based on the general statutory provisions governing sentencing. In cases that have a count or counts not covered by the guidelines in addition to a count or counts covered by the guidelines, the court shall apply the fine guidelines for the count(s) covered by the guidelines, and add any additional amount to the fine, as appropriate, for the count(s) not covered by the guidelines.

Historical Note: Effective November 1, 1991 (amendment 422).

* * * * *

3. IMPLEMENTING THE SENTENCE OF A FINE

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2023 · leading case: United States v. Oceanic Illsabe Ltd., 889 F.3d 178 (4th Cir. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Oceanic Illsabe Ltd., 889 F.3d 178 (4th Cir. 2018). · cites it 2× “" See USSG § 8C2.10 ; see also USSG § 2J1.2(a) ; USSG § 8C2.”

United States v. Bp Prods. North Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655 (S.D. Tex. 2009). “Instead, under U.S.S.G. § 8C2.10, a court is to “determine an appropriate fine by applying the provisions of 18 U.”

United States v. Electrodyne Sys. Corp., 28 F. Supp. 2d 213 (D.N.J. 1998). “In such instances, U.S.S.G. § 8C2.10 ("Section 8C2.10”) is applicable.”

United States v. Evridiki Navigation Inc (3rd Cir. 2023). “” U.S.S.G. § 8C2.10; see also United States v.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.