South Dakota Codified Laws
S.D. Codified Laws § 22-24-1 (2026)
22-24-1. Repealed by SL 1998, ch 136, § 1
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
SD-LEGsdlegislature.gov
JustiaS.D. Codified Laws
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1984–2008 · leading case: State v. Moss, 2008 SD 64 (S.D. 2008).
State v. Moss, 2008 SD 64 (S.D. 2008). “[8] SDCL 22-24-1, repealed by 1998 SD Sess Laws ch 136, § 1.”
State v. Plenty Horse, 2007 SD 114 (S.D. 2007). “1; see also SDCL 22-24-1,1 (2005); SDCL 22-24-1.2 (2005).”
Meinders v. Weber, 2000 SD 2 (S.D. 2000). “1; (11) Felony indecent exposure as set forth in former § 22-24-1 or indecent exposure as set forth in § 22-24-1.”
State v. Holzer, 2000 SD 75 (S.D. 2000). “] On December 22, 1998, Holzer was charged by indictment with attempted burglary in the first-degree (the house) (SDCL 22-32-1(3); SDCL 22-4-1), with the intent to commit sexual contact without consent, attempted burglary in the fourth-degree (the car) (SDCL 22-32-19) and…”
State v. Auen, 342 N.W.2d 236 (S.D. 1984). “Even if we could agree that because jail sentences are in practice no longer imposed for speeding violations the social opprobrium attached to a conviction of speeding is so minuscule as to render the offense petty, would we, or could we, say the same regarding convictions for…”
State v. Thompson, 1997 SD 15 (S.D. 1997). “[¶ 10] On May 9, 1994, an information was filed charging Thompson with the crimes of sexual contact with a child under the age of *538 sixteen (SDCL 22-22-7), indecent exposure (SDCL 22-24-1), and disseminating harmful material to minors (SDCL 22-24-28).”
People v. Santorelli, 600 N.E.2d 232 (NY 1992). “465; RI Gen Laws § 11-45-1; SD Codified Laws § 22-24-1; Tenn Code Annot § 39-13-511; Tex Penal Code Annot § 21.”
Doe v. Quiring, 2004 SD 101 (S.D. 2004). “1; (11) Felony indecent exposure as set forth in former § 22-24-1 or indecent exposure as set forth in § 22-24-1.”
State v. Ludwig, 468 So. 2d 1151 (La. 1985). “615; S.D. Codified Laws Ann. §§ 22-24-1, 22-6-2; Tex.”
State v. Rocky Mountain, 449 N.W.2d 257 (S.D. 1989). “PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES Steven Rocky Mountain (Rocky Mountain) was found guilty of disorderly conduct under SDCL 22-13-1(1), * a class 2 misdemeanor, and indecent exposure, under SDCL 22-24-1, after a nonjury trial before Magistrate Judge Michael J.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.