South Dakota Codified Laws
S.D. Codified Laws § 32-31-5 (2026)
Duty of operator to use care--Liability for recklessness.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
SD-LEGsdlegislature.gov
JustiaS.D. Codified Laws
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
32-31-5. Duty of operator to use care--Liability for recklessness.
The provisions of this chapter shall not relieve the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons, nor shall such provisions protect the driver from the consequences of his reckless disregard for the safety of others.
Source: SDC 1939, § 44.0320 as added by SL 1959, ch 252, § 1; SL 1963, ch 254; SL 1967, ch 191.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2024 · leading case: State v. Seidschlaw, 304 N.W.2d 102 (S.D. 1981).
State v. Seidschlaw, 304 N.W.2d 102 (S.D. 1981). “Here *108 the acts of these officers has brought them to the very edge of this precipice of rationality and may even have plunged them over that edge.”
Schaub Ex Rel. Schaub v. Moerke, 338 N.W.2d 109 (S.D. 1983). “SDCL 32-31-5 provides: The provisions of this chapter shall not relieve the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons, nor shall such provisions protect the driver from the consequences of his reckless…”
Certification of a Question of Law, 2010 SD 16 (S.D. 2010). “Additionally, SDCL 32-31-5 requires the operator of an emergency vehicle to drive "with due regard for *165 the safety of all persons" and provides that the provisions of SDCL ch.”
Gronseth v. Chester Rural Fire Prot. Dist., 779 N.W.2d 158 (S.D. 2010). “…ch. 32-31 does not "protect the driver from the consequences of his reckless disregard for the safety of others.” See SDCL 32-31-5.”
Tony Woolfolk v. St. Louis Cnty. (Mo. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 56-5-760 (South Carolina); S.D. Codified Laws § 32-31-5 (South Dakota); Tenn.”
Lauren Neil v. St. Louis Cnty. (Mo. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 56-5-760 (South Carolina); S.D. Codified Laws § 32-31-5 (South Dakota); Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.