Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 (2026)

Vesting of judicial power

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The judicial power of the state is vested in judges of the courts of general sessions, recorders of certain towns and cities, circuit courts, criminal courts, common law and chancery courts, chancery courts, courts of appeals, and the supreme court, and other courts created by law.

Code 1858, §§ 4094, 4095 (deriv. Const. 1834, art. 6, § 1); Shan., § 5907; mod. Code 1932, § 10107; modified; impl. am. Acts 1979, ch. 68, §§ 2, 3; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 16-101.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1999–2023 · leading case: State of Tennessee v. Arthur Jay Hirsch (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Arthur Jay Hirsch (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “” T.C.A. § 16-1-101. Code section 16- 10-102 vests in the circuit courts of the state “exclusive original jurisdiction of all crimes and misdemeanors, either at common law or by statute, unless otherwise expressly provided by statute or this code.”
Doe v. Tennessee, State of (M.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 . In Laborers’ International Union, Local 860, the Sixth Circuit also found significant that the judges of the state court at issue have the “authority to serve temporarily throughout Ohio’s lower court system if circumstances require” and “take an…”
State of Tennessee v. Frederick J. Schmitz, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “” T.C.A. § 16-1-101. Code section 16- 10-102 vests in the circuit courts of the state “exclusive original jurisdiction of all crimes and misdemeanors, either at common law or by statute, unless otherwise expressly provided by statute or this code.”
Nashville Cmty. Bail Fund, The v. Howard Gentry (M.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 . Most directly, then, Gentry is an employee of the Office of the Clerk of the Criminal Court of the Twentieth Judicial District (“Clerk’s Office”).”
Nashville Cmty. Bail Fund, The v. Howard Gentry (M.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 . The state’s trial courts are divided among “thirty-one (31) judicial districts” defined by statute.”
Valentine v. Gay (M.D. Tenn. 2023). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 . In Laborers’ International Union, Local 860, the Sixth Circuit also found significant that the judges of the state court at issue have the “authority to serve temporarily throughout Ohio’s lower court system if circumstances require” and “take an…”
Ross v. Shelby Co. Crim. Court (W.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 (“The judicial power of the state is vested in judges of the courts of general sessions, recorders of certain towns and cities, circuit courts, criminal courts, common law and chancery courts, 2 It is possible that Ross listed the Justice Center as…”
Cole v. Madison Cnty. Dist. Attorney (W.D. Tenn. 2021). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 (“The judicial power of the state is vested in judges of the courts of general sessions, recorders of certain towns and cities, circuit courts, criminal courts, common law and chancery courts, chancery courts, court of appeals, and the supreme…”
Quinton Albert Cage v. David Sexton, Warden (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “VI, §1; see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 . Additionally, as there is no allegation that the court departed from the mandates of the lawfully-enacted statutes criminalizing the Petitioner’s behavior, the habeas court was correct in concluding that the trial court did not…”
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Gwender L. Taylor v. Ian W. Taylor, Sr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 (1994). An action for child support is not one of those exceptions.”
State of Tennessee v. Thomas Dee Huskey (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 . The choice to use a capias, a warrant, or an attachment are all means by which a court can control the proceedings before it.”
James E. Martin v. State (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-1-101 ; Tenn. Cons t.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.