Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111 (2026)

Additional exemptions - Certain benefit payments - Awards - Tools of trade - Health care aids - Child support obligations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to the property exempt under § 26-2-103, the following shall be exempt from execution, seizure or attachment in the hands or possession of any person who is a bona fide citizen permanently residing in this state:

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 833,s 3, eff. 5/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 833,s 2, eff. 5/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 833,s 1, eff. 5/1/2024.

Acts 1980, ch. 919, § 3; T.C.A., § 26-217; Acts 1994, ch. 880, §§ 1, 2; 1996, ch. 932, § 1; 1999, ch. 103, § 1; 2001, ch. 260, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 51 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: In Re Haga, 48 B.R. 492 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1985).
In Re Haga, 48 B.R. 492 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1985). · cites it 34× “§ 522 (b)(1) (1979); Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111 (1980). The facts may be summarized as follows.”
Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence), 219 B.R. 786 (E.D. Tenn. 1998). · cites it 12× “Section 26-2-111 provides that in addition to the personal property exempt under § 26-2-102 quoted supra, certain other types of specified property “shall be exempt from execution, seizure or attachment in the hands or possession of any person who is a bona fide citizen…”
In Re Clark, 18 B.R. 824 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982). · cites it 12× “367’ reprinted in [1978] U.S.Code Cong. & Ad. News 5787, 5963, 6323.”
In re Kennedy, 552 B.R. 183 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2016). · cites it 16× “The Trustee’s objection, thus, concerns Debtor’s amendments to Schedule C by which she claims exemptions under three subsections of Tennessee Code Annotated § 26-2-111. The pertinent subsections provide, in material part: Additional exemptions — .”
In Re Sellers, 107 B.R. 152 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1989). · cites it 16× “The debtor claims his exemption under Tennessee law pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1) (1980), which provides in material part: 2 26-2-111.”
In Re Nipper, 243 B.R. 33 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1999). · cites it 14× “At issue is the exemption claimed by the Debtors, Oscar Howard Nipper and Donna Lenz Nipper, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111 (4) (Supp.1999), in a 1982 White Road Commander Truck and 1986 Great Dane Trailer.”
In Re Ridenour, 45 B.R. 72 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1984). · cites it 10× “§ 541 (c)(2) (1979) or, alternatively, exempted from the debtor’s estate under Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1) (1980). *74 I Involuntary chapter 7 proceedings were commenced against this debtor on February 10, 1984.”
McLemore v. Huffines (In Re Huffines), 57 B.R. 740 (M.D. Tenn. 1985). · cites it 15× “The Tennessee General Assembly was aware of that section when it drafted Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111, and therefore can be presumed to have specifically rejected this concept.”
In Re Thompkins, 263 B.R. 223 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 2001). · cites it 21× “§ 26-2-110 , that are paid as a result of a personal injury, even though those benefits exceed the separate $7,500 maximum for personal bodily injury exemption provided for by Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111 (2)(B) and the $15,000 cap of § 26-2-111(2).”
In Re Sumerell, 194 B.R. 818 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). · cites it 5× “Under Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111(4), the following is exempt: The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed seven hundred fifty dollars in value in any implements, professional books, or tools of the trade of the debtor or the trade of a dependent of the debtor.”
In Re Peeler, 37 B.R. 517 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1984). · cites it 6× “The issue is whether the debtor’s Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) is an ex-emptable annuity under T.C.A. § 26-2-111. After consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties and applicable authority, the court finds that this IRA is not an exemptable annuity under…”
In re Reeves, 521 B.R. 827 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2014). · cites it 13× “§ 26-2-110 may be in addition to the personal bodily injury exemption allowed by § 26-2-111.” Id. at 227. Citing Thompkins, inter alia, the Supreme Court of New Mexico, upon certification from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, also concluded that…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1) — 5 cases
In Re Clark, 18 B.R. 824 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982). “367’ reprinted in [1978] U.S.Code Cong. & Ad. News 5787, 5963, 6323.”
In Re Ridenour, 45 B.R. 72 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1984). “§ 541 (c)(2) (1979) or, alternatively, exempted from the debtor’s estate under Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1) (1980). *74 I Involuntary chapter 7 proceedings were commenced against this debtor on February 10, 1984.”
Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence), 219 B.R. 786 (E.D. Tenn. 1998). “Section 26-2-111 provides that in addition to the personal property exempt under § 26-2-102 quoted supra, certain other types of specified property “shall be exempt from execution, seizure or attachment in the hands or possession of any person who is a bona fide citizen…”
In Re Sellers, 107 B.R. 152 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1989). “The debtor claims his exemption under Tennessee law pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1) (1980), which provides in material part: 2 26-2-111.”
In Re Luttrell, 313 B.R. 751 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1)(A) — 2 cases
In Re Hensley, 393 B.R. 186 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1)(C) — 2 cases
McLemore v. Huffines (In Re Huffines), 57 B.R. 740 (M.D. Tenn. 1985). “The Tennessee General Assembly was aware of that section when it drafted Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111, and therefore can be presumed to have specifically rejected this concept.”
In Re Luttrell, 313 B.R. 751 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1)(D) — 16 cases
In Re Sellers, 107 B.R. 152 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1989). “The debtor claims his exemption under Tennessee law pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1) (1980), which provides in material part: 2 26-2-111.”
In Re Ridenour, 45 B.R. 72 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1984). “§ 541 (c)(2) (1979) or, alternatively, exempted from the debtor’s estate under Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1) (1980). *74 I Involuntary chapter 7 proceedings were commenced against this debtor on February 10, 1984.”
Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence), 219 B.R. 786 (E.D. Tenn. 1998). “Section 26-2-111 provides that in addition to the personal property exempt under § 26-2-102 quoted supra, certain other types of specified property “shall be exempt from execution, seizure or attachment in the hands or possession of any person who is a bona fide citizen…”
In Re Vickers, 408 B.R. 131 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009).
In Re Clark, 18 B.R. 824 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982). “367’ reprinted in [1978] U.S.Code Cong. & Ad. News 5787, 5963, 6323.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1)(D)(iii) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1)(E) — 3 cases
Storey v. Bradford Furniture Co., Inc., 910 S.W.2d 857 (Tenn. 1995).
Bradford Furniture Co. v. Storey (In re Storey), 172 B.R. 872 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1994).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(1)(e) — 1 case
In Re Luttrell, 313 B.R. 751 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(2) — 2 cases
In re Kennedy, 552 B.R. 183 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2016). “The Trustee’s objection, thus, concerns Debtor’s amendments to Schedule C by which she claims exemptions under three subsections of Tennessee Code Annotated § 26-2-111. The pertinent subsections provide, in material part: Additional exemptions — .”
In Re Thompkins, 263 B.R. 223 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 2001). “§ 26-2-110 , that are paid as a result of a personal injury, even though those benefits exceed the separate $7,500 maximum for personal bodily injury exemption provided for by Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111 (2)(B) and the $15,000 cap of § 26-2-111(2).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(2)(B) — 8 cases
In Re Haga, 48 B.R. 492 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1985). “§ 522 (b)(1) (1979); Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111 (1980). The facts may be summarized as follows.”
In re Reeves, 521 B.R. 827 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2014). “§ 26-2-110 may be in addition to the personal bodily injury exemption allowed by § 26-2-111.” Id. at 227. Citing Thompkins, inter alia, the Supreme Court of New Mexico, upon certification from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, also concluded that…”
In Re Chapman, 424 B.R. 823 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2010).
In re Kennedy, 552 B.R. 183 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2016). “The Trustee’s objection, thus, concerns Debtor’s amendments to Schedule C by which she claims exemptions under three subsections of Tennessee Code Annotated § 26-2-111. The pertinent subsections provide, in material part: Additional exemptions — .”
In Re Gregg, 371 B.R. 817 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2007).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(3) — 6 cases
In Re Haga, 48 B.R. 492 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1985). “§ 522 (b)(1) (1979); Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111 (1980). The facts may be summarized as follows.”
In re Kennedy, 552 B.R. 183 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2016). “The Trustee’s objection, thus, concerns Debtor’s amendments to Schedule C by which she claims exemptions under three subsections of Tennessee Code Annotated § 26-2-111. The pertinent subsections provide, in material part: Additional exemptions — .”
In Re Crowell, 53 B.R. 555 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1985).
McLemore v. Huffines (In Re Huffines), 57 B.R. 740 (M.D. Tenn. 1985). “The Tennessee General Assembly was aware of that section when it drafted Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111, and therefore can be presumed to have specifically rejected this concept.”
In Re Chaney, 151 B.R. 147 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1993).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(4) — 6 cases
In Re Sumerell, 194 B.R. 818 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). “Under Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111(4), the following is exempt: The debtor’s aggregate interest, not to exceed seven hundred fifty dollars in value in any implements, professional books, or tools of the trade of the debtor or the trade of a dependent of the debtor.”
In Re Nipper, 243 B.R. 33 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1999). “At issue is the exemption claimed by the Debtors, Oscar Howard Nipper and Donna Lenz Nipper, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111 (4) (Supp.1999), in a 1982 White Road Commander Truck and 1986 Great Dane Trailer.”
In Re Siegel, 214 B.R. 329 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1997).
McLemore v. Huffines (In Re Huffines), 57 B.R. 740 (M.D. Tenn. 1985). “The Tennessee General Assembly was aware of that section when it drafted Tenn.Code Ann. § 26-2-111, and therefore can be presumed to have specifically rejected this concept.”
In Re Aurelio, 252 B.R. 102 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2000).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(D) — 1 case
In Re Leamon, 121 B.R. 974 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1990).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 26-2-111(l)(D) — 1 case
In Re Clark, 18 B.R. 824 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982). “367’ reprinted in [1978] U.S.Code Cong. & Ad. News 5787, 5963, 6323.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.