Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-1-103 (2026)
Receivers pending litigation
✓ current as of May 2026
The courts are all vested with power to appoint receivers for the safekeeping, collection, management, and disposition of property in litigation in such court, whenever necessary to the ends of substantial justice, in like manner as receivers are appointed by courts of chancery.
Code 1858, § 3768; Shan., § 5549; Code 1932, § 9719; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 23-104.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: First Am. Trust Co. v. Franklin-Murray Dev. Co., L.P., 59 S.W.3d 135 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
First Am. Trust Co. v. Franklin-Murray Dev. Co., L.P., 59 S.W.3d 135 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “First American invoked Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-1-103 (2000) as authority for the trial court to appoint a post-judgment receiver.”
Delwin L. Huggins v. R.Ellsworth McKee, 500 S.W.3d 360 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “McKee’s wrongful financial dealings. Tennessee courts “are all vested with power to appoint receivers for the safekeeping, collection, management, and disposition of property in litigation in such court, whenever necessary to the ends of substantial justice[.”
State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-1-103 (2000); KMC Co.”
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney Gen. & Reporter v. HRC Med. Centers, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). “Code 2 Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-1-103 provides, “The courts are all vested with power to appoint receivers for the safekeeping, collection, management, and disposition of property in litigation in such court, whenever necessary to the ends of substantial justice, in…”
State of Tennessee ex rel. William L. Gibbons, Dist. Attorney Gen. v. Club Universe (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-1-103 (2000). -6- Code Ann.”
Louise Ann Sexton v. Michael Bryant Sexton (2024). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-1-103 . Although Mr.”
State, ex rel v. Xantus (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-1-103 ; KMC, Inc. v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.