Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-25-102 (2026)

Alternative and peremptory writs

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Code 1858, § 3569; Shan., § 5333; Code 1932, § 9493; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 23-2002.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Lucius v. City of Memphis, 925 S.W.2d 522 (Tenn. 1996).
Lucius v. City of Memphis, 925 S.W.2d 522 (Tenn. 1996). · cites it 4× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-25-102(2)(1980 Repl.).”
Shelby Cnty., Tennessee v. Stephanie Taylor (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 3× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-25-102 . “The general rule regarding the issuance of a writ of mandamus is that the writ is not issued to control or coerce discretionary power by a board or officer [] but will lie to enforce the performance of an official duty and to compel the exercise of…”
State ex rel. Tanya Aina-Labinjo v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “3 The court issued the peremptory writ under the authority of Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-25-102 (2) and 29-25-108(a).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-25-102(1) — 1 case
Shelby Cnty., Tennessee v. Stephanie Taylor (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-25-102 . “The general rule regarding the issuance of a writ of mandamus is that the writ is not issued to control or coerce discretionary power by a board or officer [] but will lie to enforce the performance of an official duty and to compel the exercise of…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-25-102(2) — 1 case
Lucius v. City of Memphis, 925 S.W.2d 522 (Tenn. 1996). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-25-102(2)(1980 Repl.).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.