Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-1-201 (2026)

Responsibilities of department - State policy toward mental illness or serious emotional disturbance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The department serves as the state's mental health authority and is responsible for system planning, setting policy and quality standards, system monitoring and evaluation, disseminating public information and advocacy for persons of all ages who have mental illness or serious emotional disturbance. It is the policy of the state to plan on the basis of and to promote the use of private and public service providers, without regard for funding source, to achieve outcomes and accomplishments that create opportunities for service recipients and potential service recipients to have the greatest possible control of their lives in the least restrictive environment that is appropriate for each person. The department shall plan for and promote the availability of a comprehensive array of high quality prevention, early intervention, treatment, and habilitation services and supports based on the needs and choices of service recipients and families served. The department shall include service recipients and members of service recipients' families in planning, developing, and monitoring the service systems.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 688,s 13, eff. 7/1/2024.

Acts 2000, ch. 947, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2024 · leading case: Battle v. State of Tennessee (M.D. Tenn. 2024).
Battle v. State of Tennessee (M.D. Tenn. 2024). · cites it 5× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-1-201 . It relies on both state and federal funding.”
Tennessee Cmty. Organizations v. Tennessee Dep't of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-1-201 . To achieve its functions, TDIDD is authorized “to promote the use of private and public service providers .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.