Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101

Twenty days' notice by publication

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Code 1858, § 2145 (deriv. Acts 1855-1856, ch. 83, §1); Acts 1859-1860, ch. 60; Shan., § 3838; mod. Code 1932, § 7793; Acts 1943, ch. 123, § 1; mod. C. Supp. 1950, § 7793; Acts 1957, ch. 41, §1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 35-501; Acts 2006, ch. 801, §10; 2008 , ch. 743, § 1; 2011 , ch. 505, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 52 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1990–2026 · leading case: Lawrence Glazer v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
Lawrence Glazer v. Chase Home Finance, LLC (2013) ca6 · cites it 2× “3204 (authorizing foreclosure by advertisement only if no lawsuit has been filed to recover the underlying debt); Tenn.Code Ann. § 35-5-101 (permitting foreclosure by advertisement).”
Citimortgage, Inc. v. Angeline Renee Drake (2013) tennctapp · cites it 4× “The counterclaim asserts that “[t]he following statutes are wholly or partially unconstitutional: Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 35-5-101 , 35-5-103, 35-5-106, 29-23-201, 29-18-119(c), and 29-18-125.”
Marra v. Bank of New York (2009) tennctapp · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101 (2007). The court-ordered sale of the Breezy Meadows Property was held on March 8, 2007.”
Kirkland Sturgis v. Donna Smith Thompson (2011) tennctapp · cites it 2× “In its order, the General Sessions Court referenced the statutes governing judicial or trust sales, Tennessee Code Annotated § 35-5-101, et seq. It acknowledged the specific notice requirements in Sections 35-5-101 through 105, but found that Sturgis was a good faith purchaser…”
Third National Bank in Nashville v. Knobler (1990) tenn · cites it 4× “The bank then moved to have the survivorship interest sold in a judicial sale pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101 et seq. In an order entered on August 21, 1987, the chancellor denied the requested sale on the ground that the cited code sections applied to judicial sales of…”
Galyon v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'n (1991) tenn · cites it 6× “They held that although defendants complied with T.C.A. § 35-5-101, which requires that a foreclosure sale be advertised three (3) times with the first advertisement to appear at least twenty (20) days prior to the sale, they failed to comply with the terms of the deed of trust…”
Coleman v. Indymac Venture LLC (2013) tnwd · cites it 2× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 35-5-101(e). Because Coleman is not a debtor or a co-debtor, Indymac Venture is not required, under Tennessee law, to send him a notice of the' foreclosure sale.”
Greenstein v. Bank of Ozarks (2014) gactapp “See generally Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 35-5-101 through 35-5-118.”
Diana Sue Long v. Michael George Long (1997) tennctapp · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 35-5-101 (1996). We disagree with the husband’s characterization of the trial court’s ruling and find that, by its language, the court was simply informing the parties that it contemplated the wife’s full-time employment so that this would not be a “a…”
State, ex rel., Jana Ruth Alford Nichols v. Randall Nelson Songstad (2018) tennctapp · cites it 2× ““[S]ince 1984, the process and criteria for ascertaining a parent’s child support obligation has been governed by Child Support Guidelines promulgated by the Tennessee Department of Human Services in accordance with Tenn.”
Glenver Ian Smith v. Stephen L. Hughes (2021) tennctapp · cites it 21× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101 (e). Notably, however, the statute only provides that the trustee shall “send” the notice, and “[t]here is no statutory requirement that the notice be received by the debtor.”
Earl Thacker v. Shapiro & Kirsch, LLP., Paul Abraham and the Knoxville News Sentinel (2011) tennctapp · cites it 9× “Plaintiffs contend that, pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 35-5-101 (a), S & K was required to advertise the foreclosure sale in that paper, and not in a newspaper published in another county, such as Knox County.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(a) — 4 cases
Earl Thacker v. Shapiro & Kirsch, LLP., Paul Abraham and the Knoxville News Sentinel (2011) tennctapp “Plaintiffs contend that, pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 35-5-101 (a), S & K was required to advertise the foreclosure sale in that paper, and not in a newspaper published in another county, such as Knox County.”
Glenver Ian Smith v. Stephen L. Hughes (2021) tennctapp “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101 (e). Notably, however, the statute only provides that the trustee shall “send” the notice, and “[t]here is no statutory requirement that the notice be received by the debtor.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(a)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(a)(3) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(d) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(d)(1) — 2 cases
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(d)(1)(K) — 1 case
Huan Ouyang v. Xiaohui Chen (2005) tennctapp
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(e) — 6 cases
Coleman v. Indymac Venture LLC (2013) tnwd “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 35-5-101(e). Because Coleman is not a debtor or a co-debtor, Indymac Venture is not required, under Tennessee law, to send him a notice of the' foreclosure sale.”
Glenver Ian Smith v. Stephen L. Hughes (2021) tennctapp “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101 (e). Notably, however, the statute only provides that the trustee shall “send” the notice, and “[t]here is no statutory requirement that the notice be received by the debtor.”
Connor v. Russell (2022) tnmb
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(f) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(f)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 35-5-101(f)(3) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.