Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101 (2026)

Purpose of part - Construction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1951, ch. 202, § 1 (Williams, § 9572.15); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 36-101; Acts 1995, ch. 532, § 1; 1996, ch. 1054, §§ 1, 2; 1998, ch. 1097, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 395 cases (147 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: In Re Baby, 447 S.W.3d 807 (Tenn. 2014).
In Re Baby, 447 S.W.3d 807 (Tenn. 2014). · cites it 4× “Acts 951 (codified as amended at Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 36-1-101 to -206 (2014)).”
In Re Adoption of M.J.S., 44 S.W.3d 41 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 10× “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a) (Supp.1998).”
Doe v. Sundquist, 2 S.W.3d 919 (Tenn. 1999). · cites it 3× “The stay granted by the Court of Appeals prohibiting the release of adoption records under the provisions of Tenn.Code Ann. § 36 — 1—127(c) is lifted.”
In Re Swanson, 2 S.W.3d 180 (Tenn. 1999). · cites it 2× “532 (codified as Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 36-1-101 *185 to 36-1-206 (1996 & Supp.”
In Re Alexis C. (2018). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101 (d) (2017). Ascertaining a child’s best interests involves more than a “rote examination” of the statutory factors.”
In Re Addalyne S., 556 S.W.3d 774 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “§ 36-1-101 (d) (2017). In re Gabriella D.”
In Re NATHANIEL C.T., Jason J.T. & Emerald S.T., 447 S.W.3d 244 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “The Trial Court stated, in part: The Court finds that this action was originally commenced as a termination of parental rights and adoption case under T.C.A § 36-1-101 et seq. The statute recited by the Movants, T.”
In Re Daymien T., 506 S.W.3d 461 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “§ 36-1-101(d). Further, “[t]he child’s best interest must be viewed from the child’s, rather than the parent’s, perspective.”
Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. Wilbourn, 781 S.W.2d 857 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 3× “Adoptions in Tennessee are governed by statute, specifically T.C.A. § 36-1-101, et seq. Pursuant to § 36-1-105, Powell filed a petition for adoption in the Chancery Court for Shelby County on April 5, 1983.”
In re C.A.F., 114 S.W.3d 524 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “Public Policy and the Adoption Statutes • [41 The Department of Children’s Services argues that the State has a special duty to protect children, and that this duty is articulated among other places in the adoption statutes, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101 , et seq. The procedures…”
In Re Adoption of A.K.S.R., 71 S.W.3d 715 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101 (d). The trial court found that appellee should have custody of the twins for several reasons: The Court finds that Robbie Fulford is the paternal aunt of these children and the adopted parent of their only sibling.”
In re T.K.Y., 205 S.W.3d 343 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 2× “§§ 36-1-101 to -142. A Determining the “Father” We must first determine whether, under Tennessee’s statutory parentage scheme, Mr.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101(1)(a)(iv) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a) — 1 case
In Re Adoption of M.J.S., 44 S.W.3d 41 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a) (Supp.1998).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a)(2) — 2 cases
In re C.A.F., 114 S.W.3d 524 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Public Policy and the Adoption Statutes • [41 The Department of Children’s Services argues that the State has a special duty to protect children, and that this duty is articulated among other places in the adoption statutes, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101 , et seq. The procedures…”
In Re Caf, 114 S.W.3d 524 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a)(2)(C) — 2 cases
In Re Caroline U. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a)(3) — 1 case
Devona Mills v. Immual Mills (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a)(4) — 1 case
In Re Adoption of M.J.S., 44 S.W.3d 41 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a) (Supp.1998).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a)(5) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-101(d) — 13 cases
In Re Adoption of M.J.S., 44 S.W.3d 41 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-101(a) (Supp.1998).”
In Re Daymien T., 506 S.W.3d 461 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “§ 36-1-101(d). Further, “[t]he child’s best interest must be viewed from the child’s, rather than the parent’s, perspective.”
In Re Bac, 317 S.W.3d 718 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
In Re Sy, 121 S.W.3d 358 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Metric D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.