Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (2026)

Termination of parental or guardianship rights

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 996,s 9, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 996,s 25, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 996,s 12, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 996,s 11, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 996,s 10, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 652,s 1, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 613,s 9, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 263, s 4, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 253, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 263, s 5, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 393, s 1, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 219, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 363, s 14, eff. 5/5/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 363, s 13, eff. 5/5/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 363, s 3, eff. 5/5/2023.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 937, Secs.s 3, s 4, s 5, s 6, s 13, s 14 eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 937, s 2, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 235, s 2, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 190, s 1, eff. 4/22/2021.

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 525, Secs.s 5, s 6, s 7 eff. 3/6/2020.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 36, Secs.s 4, s 24, s 25, s 26, s 27, s 28 eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 36, s 3, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 875, Secs.s 9, s 10, s 11, s 12, s 17 eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 875, s 7, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 560, Secs.s 1, s 2, s 3, s 4, s 5 eff. 3/14/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 263, s 1, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 919, Secs.s 7, s 20 eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 919, Secs.s 8, s 9 eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 659, s 1, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 636, s 5, eff. 3/23/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 237, s 1, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 365, s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 298, s 1, eff. 4/29/2013.

Acts 1951, ch. 202, § 5 (Williams, § 9572.19); Acts 1955, ch. 320, § 1; 1957, ch. 292, § 1; 1959, ch. 111, § 1; 1959, ch. 223, § 4; impl. am. Acts 1975, ch. 219, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 36-110; § 36-1-110; Acts 1995, ch. 532, § 1; 1996, ch. 1054, §§ 41-44; 1997 , ch. 379, § 1; 1997 , ch. 551, § 54; 1998, ch. 1097, §§ 4 - 11; 1998, ch. 1098, § 4; 1999, ch. 467, § 1; 2000, ch. 683, §§ 1, 3; 2003 , ch. 84, §§ 1, 2; 2003 , ch. 231, §§ 9, 10; 2006, ch. 890, § 2; 2007 , ch. 372, §§ 1, 2; 2008 , ch. 1059, §§ 1 - 3; 2008 , ch. 1162, §§ 3, 4; 2010 , ch. 821, § 1; 2010 , ch. 842, § 1; 2010 , ch. 881, § 2; 2012 , ch. 848, § 8; 2012, ch. 1042, §§ 1 - 3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,711 cases (384 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 165× “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re: Kaliyah S., 455 S.W.3d 533 (Tenn. 2015). · cites it 89× “5 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(4) (2014) (listing severe abuse in dependency and neglect proceedings as ground for termination of parental rights); id.”
In Re Carrington H., 483 S.W.3d 507 (Tenn. 2016). · cites it 46× “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(3). 8 Termination of parental rights is permissible if clear and convincing evidence establishes that: (i) The parent or guardian of the child is incompetent to adequately provide for the further care and supervision of the child because the…”
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 53× “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 77× “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 70× “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Adoption of A.M.H., 215 S.W.3d 793 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 24× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (2005). 5 . Although the legislature has the power to enact statutes of limitation barring relief on complaints filed beyond the limitations period, see Maestas v.”
Jones v. Garrett, 92 S.W.3d 835 (Tenn. 2002). · cites it 21× “Furthermore, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-l-117(b) shows a clear preference for determining paternity prior to considering a petition to terminate a father’s parental rights pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113. Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
In Re Addalyne S., 556 S.W.3d 774 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 29× “2005) (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)). Thus, a party seeking to terminate a parent’s rights must prove (1) existence of one of the statutory grounds and (2) that termination is in the child’s best interest.”
In Re Arteria H., 326 S.W.3d 167 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 30× “Tenn.Code Ann. §36-1-113 is the statute which provides the grounds for termination of parental rights.”
In re M.J.B., 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 42× “The Appellate Record in Termination Cases Like many other appeals from decisions to terminate parental rights under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 , the record in this case contains many extraneous documents *651 that are not properly includable in the record on appeal.”
In Re: Taylor B. W., 397 S.W.3d 105 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 23× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (0(3). The trial court further found that Mother enjoyed a relationship with the children until Stepmother became involved although the younger daughter testified that she had few memories of Mother.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(1) — 2 cases
State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. C.H.K., 154 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
Dept of Child.'s Srvcs. v. L.F. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(1)(A)(i) — 1 case
In Re Antonio J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(1)(A)(iv) — 2 cases
In Re Hannah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Serenity L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(14) — 1 case
In Re Giavanna K. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(3)(A) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(4)(6) — 1 case
In Re Adaleigh M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(4)(9) — 1 case
In Re Adaleigh M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(5)(g) — 1 case
Bull v. Bull (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(7)(B) — 1 case
Bull v. Bull (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(8)(A) — 2 cases
Jones v. Garrett, 92 S.W.3d 835 (Tenn. 2002). “Furthermore, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-l-117(b) shows a clear preference for determining paternity prior to considering a petition to terminate a father’s parental rights pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113. Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(8)(B)(ii) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(8)(C)(2001) — 1 case
In Re Src, 156 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(9)(A) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(9)(A)(i) — 1 case
In Re Madilene G. R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(9)(A)(iii) — 2 cases
In Re: Addison P. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Elizabeth Y. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(9)(A)(iv) — 3 cases
In Re: Addison P. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Madilene G. R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(9)(A)(vi) — 2 cases
In Re Madilene G. R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(9)(g)(A) — 1 case
In Re Dah, 142 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(A) — 1 case
In Re: Courtney N. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(C) — 2 cases
In Re: Joshua S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(C)(1) — 1 case
In Re: Joshua S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(G)(1) — 1 case
In Re Joshua S. (2019).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(G)(3)(A) — 3 cases
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. C.H.K., 154 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
State v. CHK, 154 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(G)(4) — 1 case
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(G)(8) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(G)(9)(VI) — 1 case
In Re Hej, 124 S.W.3d 110 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(I) — 22 cases
In Re Frr, III, 193 S.W.3d 528 (Tenn. 2006).
State Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Stewart, 124 S.W.3d 609 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Src, 156 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
State v. CHK, 154 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In the Matter of Ryan K.M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(I)(2001) — 1 case
In Re Src, 156 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(I)(5) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(K) — 1 case
Emily Gordon Fox v. Robert Gordon (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(a) — 12 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re Baby, 447 S.W.3d 807 (Tenn. 2014).
In Re Valle, 31 S.W.3d 566 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
In Re: Kira D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Dezeray H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(a)(3) — 1 case
In Re: Askia K. B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(b) — 17 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
Osborn v. Marr, 127 S.W.3d 737 (Tenn. 2004).
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re: Kaliyah S., 455 S.W.3d 533 (Tenn. 2015). “5 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(4) (2014) (listing severe abuse in dependency and neglect proceedings as ground for termination of parental rights); id.”
In Re: Taylor B. W., 397 S.W.3d 105 (Tenn. 2013). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (0(3). The trial court further found that Mother enjoyed a relationship with the children until Stepmother became involved although the younger daughter testified that she had few memories of Mother.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(b)(1) — 5 cases
In re Joseph F., 492 S.W.3d 690 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re: Ava B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Paetyn M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).
In re Sonya M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).
In re Gavin G. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c) — 134 cases
In Re: Kaliyah S., 455 S.W.3d 533 (Tenn. 2015). “5 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(4) (2014) (listing severe abuse in dependency and neglect proceedings as ground for termination of parental rights); id.”
In Re Adoption of A.M.H., 215 S.W.3d 793 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (2005). 5 . Although the legislature has the power to enact statutes of limitation barring relief on complaints filed beyond the limitations period, see Maestas v.”
In The Matter of: Dakota C.R., 404 S.W.3d 484 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
In Re A’mari B., 358 S.W.3d 204 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Hood, 338 S.W.3d 917 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(1) — 103 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Adoption of A.M.H., 215 S.W.3d 793 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (2005). 5 . Although the legislature has the power to enact statutes of limitation barring relief on complaints filed beyond the limitations period, see Maestas v.”
In Re Tiffany B., 228 S.W.3d 148 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(1)(2) — 7 cases
In Re Ljc, 124 S.W.3d 609 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Sy, 121 S.W.3d 358 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In matter of: S.Y., J.Y., & D.Y. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In the matter of Katherine C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(2) — 121 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
Jones v. Garrett, 92 S.W.3d 835 (Tenn. 2002). “Furthermore, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-l-117(b) shows a clear preference for determining paternity prior to considering a petition to terminate a father’s parental rights pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113. Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
In Re Adoption of A.M.H., 215 S.W.3d 793 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (2005). 5 . Although the legislature has the power to enact statutes of limitation barring relief on complaints filed beyond the limitations period, see Maestas v.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(2001) — 5 cases
Welch v. Welch, 195 S.W.3d 72 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re Mld, 182 S.W.3d 890 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re Cts, 156 S.W.3d 18 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Src, 156 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(2005) — 3 cases
State of Tennessee v. Phyllis McCrary (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Sandra Burton v. Kizzy McCary (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(4) — 1 case
In Re: Paige A.F. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(9)(A)(ii) — 1 case
In Re Landon H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(g) — 1 case
Farmer v. Dept. of Child. Svcs. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(i) — 1 case
In Re S.R.M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(c)(l) — 1 case
In re S.Y., 121 S.W.3d 358 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d) — 1 case
In Re Carrington H., 483 S.W.3d 507 (Tenn. 2016). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(3). 8 Termination of parental rights is permissible if clear and convincing evidence establishes that: (i) The parent or guardian of the child is incompetent to adequately provide for the further care and supervision of the child because the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(1) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Phyllis McCrary (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
James Rainey v. Leslie Head (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(3) — 1 case
In Re B.B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(3)(A) — 1 case
In Re Elizabeth Y. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(3)(A)(i) — 3 cases
In Re Emma S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Bentley D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Kailyn B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(3)(B) — 2 cases
In Re: Gabrielle W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re: Jarrett P. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(3)(C) — 5 cases
In the Matter of Levi D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
In Re Emma S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re S.R.M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(3)(C)(i) — 4 cases
In re B.A.C., 317 S.W.3d 718 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
In Re Bac, 317 S.W.3d 718 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
In the Matter of Levi D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(3)(C)(ii) — 1 case
In Re Bentley D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(3)(C)(iii) — 1 case
In Re Bac, 317 S.W.3d 718 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(4) — 5 cases
In re Colton R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
Fetterolf v. Fetterolf (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Sarah Chapman v. Chris Wade (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re: Michaela v. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(4)(A) — 3 cases
In Re: B.N.S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
Fetterolf v. Fetterolf (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(4)(B) — 1 case
In Re: B.N.S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(4)(C) — 1 case
In Re: B.N.S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(e) — 1 case
Kevin Turner v. Stephanie D. Turner, 473 S.W.3d 257 (Tenn. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(e)(2) — 1 case
In re Adrianna S., 520 S.W.3d 548 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(e)(2001) — 1 case
In re S.R.C., 156 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(f) — 13 cases
In Re: Addison P. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Jordan T. J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
In Re Bobby G., Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
In Re A.W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
In Re: Tiphani H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(f)(1)(B)(ii) — 1 case
In Re Fred M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(f)(3) — 5 cases
In Re Lydia N.-S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Bobby G., Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
Katarina Rice v. Edward Rice (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
In Matter of Jo'Nise Perry (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
In Re: Montana R.T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(f)(4)(A) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(f)(5) — 2 cases
In Re: Tiphani H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
In Re Jordan T. J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g) — 306 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Hood, 338 S.W.3d 917 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(1) — 366 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re Arteria H., 326 S.W.3d 167 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Tenn.Code Ann. §36-1-113 is the statute which provides the grounds for termination of parental rights.”
In Re Jacobe M.J., 434 S.W.3d 565 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
In Re Adoption of A.M.H., 215 S.W.3d 793 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (2005). 5 . Although the legislature has the power to enact statutes of limitation barring relief on complaints filed beyond the limitations period, see Maestas v.”
In Re: Kaliyah S., 455 S.W.3d 533 (Tenn. 2015). “5 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(4) (2014) (listing severe abuse in dependency and neglect proceedings as ground for termination of parental rights); id.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(1)(iv) — 1 case
In Re: Jena P. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(10) — 1 case
In Re O.w., Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(11) — 2 cases
In Re Hailey C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re O.w., Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(11)(A)(i) — 1 case
In Re: Ava B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(11)(B) — 1 case
In Re Hailey C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(14) — 209 cases
In Re: Braelyn S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
In Re Brooklyn M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Nevaeh B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
In Re Autumn D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(2) — 264 cases
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
In Re Carrington H., 483 S.W.3d 507 (Tenn. 2016). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(3). 8 Termination of parental rights is permissible if clear and convincing evidence establishes that: (i) The parent or guardian of the child is incompetent to adequately provide for the further care and supervision of the child because the…”
In Re Arteria H., 326 S.W.3d 167 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Tenn.Code Ann. §36-1-113 is the statute which provides the grounds for termination of parental rights.”
In re M.J.B., 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “The Appellate Record in Termination Cases Like many other appeals from decisions to terminate parental rights under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 , the record in this case contains many extraneous documents *651 that are not properly includable in the record on appeal.”
In Re Valentine, 79 S.W.3d 539 (Tenn. 2002).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(2001) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3) — 312 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re Carrington H., 483 S.W.3d 507 (Tenn. 2016). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(3). 8 Termination of parental rights is permissible if clear and convincing evidence establishes that: (i) The parent or guardian of the child is incompetent to adequately provide for the further care and supervision of the child because the…”
In Re Arteria H., 326 S.W.3d 167 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Tenn.Code Ann. §36-1-113 is the statute which provides the grounds for termination of parental rights.”
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
State Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. B.J.N., 242 S.W.3d 491 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(A) — 101 cases
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. C.H.K., 154 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
State Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. A.M.H., 198 S.W.3d 757 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
In re M.A.R., 183 S.W.3d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(A)(2005) — 1 case
Sandra Burton v. Kizzy McCary (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(A)(I) — 2 cases
In matter of: S.Y., J.Y., & D.Y. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
Farmer v. Dept. of Child. Svcs. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(A)(i) — 14 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
State Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. A.M.H., 198 S.W.3d 757 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
In Re Adoption of KBH, 206 S.W.3d 80 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
In Re Sy, 121 S.W.3d 358 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(A)(ii) — 5 cases
In Re Jayden L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
In Re Braden K. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
In Re James W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
Farmer v. Dept. of Child. Svcs. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Shipley v. Shipley (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(A)(iii) — 10 cases
In Re L.F. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
In Re Jayden L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
In Re James W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(B) — 1 case
In Re Thomas L. H. H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(C) — 3 cases
In Re Thomas L. H. H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(a) — 3 cases
Jaleesa Davis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(a)(i) — 1 case
In Re C.l.m., M.m.m., & S.D.M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(3)(ii) — 1 case
In Re Masson S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(4) — 157 cases
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
In re M.J.B., 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “The Appellate Record in Termination Cases Like many other appeals from decisions to terminate parental rights under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 , the record in this case contains many extraneous documents *651 that are not properly includable in the record on appeal.”
In The Matter of: Dakota C.R., 404 S.W.3d 484 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(5) — 29 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In re R.L.F., 278 S.W.3d 305 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
In Re Rlf, 278 S.W.3d 305 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
In the matter of: Shyronne D. H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
In Re Miley D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(6) — 80 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re the Adoption of E.N.R., 42 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. 2001).
Osborn v. Marr, 127 S.W.3d 737 (Tenn. 2004).
In Re Adoption of Copeland, 43 S.W.3d 483 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(6)(2001) — 1 case
In Re Cts, 156 S.W.3d 18 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(6)(A) — 2 cases
IN Re Zae'Alei R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Gracelyn H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(7) — 7 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In the Matter of Levi D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
In Re Christopher J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Emmeline C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(7)(A) — 1 case
In Re Emmeline C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(7)(A)(ii) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8) — 46 cases
State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Mims, 285 S.W.3d 435 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
In re M.J.B., 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “The Appellate Record in Termination Cases Like many other appeals from decisions to terminate parental rights under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 , the record in this case contains many extraneous documents *651 that are not properly includable in the record on appeal.”
In re Joseph F., 492 S.W.3d 690 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Mjb, 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Dorothy A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8)(A) — 6 cases
In re D.A.H., 142 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2004).
In Re Dah, 142 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2004).
In Matter of R.C v. & O.V. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
In Matter of D.A.H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8)(A)(ii) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8)(A)(iv) — 2 cases
Jones v. Garrett, 92 S.W.3d 835 (Tenn. 2002). “Furthermore, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-l-117(b) shows a clear preference for determining paternity prior to considering a petition to terminate a father’s parental rights pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113. Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8)(A)(vi) — 4 cases
Jones v. Garrett, 92 S.W.3d 835 (Tenn. 2002). “Furthermore, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-l-117(b) shows a clear preference for determining paternity prior to considering a petition to terminate a father’s parental rights pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113. Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
In Matter of D.A.H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In Matter of D.A.H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8)(B) — 16 cases
In Re Carrington H., 483 S.W.3d 507 (Tenn. 2016). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(3). 8 Termination of parental rights is permissible if clear and convincing evidence establishes that: (i) The parent or guardian of the child is incompetent to adequately provide for the further care and supervision of the child because the…”
State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Peterson, 341 S.W.3d 281 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
In Re Quadayvon H (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re: Eric G. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Skyler M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8)(B)(2001) — 2 cases
In re S.R.C., 156 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Src, 156 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8)(B)(i) — 8 cases
In Re Gracelyn H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Quadayvon H (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re: Samuel R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Matter of R.C v. & O.V. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
Dept of Child.'s Srvcs v. R.M.M., Sr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8)(B)(ii) — 1 case
Jones v. Garrett, 92 S.W.3d 835 (Tenn. 2002). “Furthermore, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-l-117(b) shows a clear preference for determining paternity prior to considering a petition to terminate a father’s parental rights pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113. Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8)(C) — 3 cases
State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Mims, 285 S.W.3d 435 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
In Re Brittany D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(8A)(B) — 1 case
In Matter of R.C v. & O.V. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9) — 32 cases
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
In re S.M., 149 S.W.3d 632 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Sm, 149 S.W.3d 632 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Mjb, 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re: Tiffany B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(A) — 34 cases
In re D.A.H., 142 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2004).
In Re Adoption of A.M.H., 215 S.W.3d 793 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (2005). 5 . Although the legislature has the power to enact statutes of limitation barring relief on complaints filed beyond the limitations period, see Maestas v.”
In re S.M., 149 S.W.3d 632 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In re T.K.Y., 205 S.W.3d 343 (Tenn. 2006).
In Re Dah, 142 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(A)(i) — 5 cases
In Re Nicholai L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re: Anna S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
In Re Azalaya J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Kaniel Y. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(A)(ii) — 5 cases
In re Alysia S., 460 S.W.3d 536 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).
In re Ashton B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re: Alexis M.M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
In Re Nicholai L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re: Lyric J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(A)(iii) — 13 cases
In re D.A.H., 142 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2004).
In Re Dah, 142 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2004).
In Re Whisper B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In re Ashton B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re E.C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(A)(iv) — 15 cases
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
In Re: Tiffany B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
In Re E.C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Skylar M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(A)(v) — 9 cases
In Re: Tiffany B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
In Re E.C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Skylar M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
In Re Hannah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Steele M (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(A)(vi) — 19 cases
Jones v. Garrett, 92 S.W.3d 835 (Tenn. 2002). “Furthermore, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-l-117(b) shows a clear preference for determining paternity prior to considering a petition to terminate a father’s parental rights pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113. Tennessee Code Annotated section…”
In re D.A.H., 142 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2004).
In Re Tky, 205 S.W.3d 343 (Tenn. 2006).
In Re Dah, 142 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. 2004).
In Re E.C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(B) — 2 cases
In Re Adaline D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
In re Ashton B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(B)(i) — 1 case
In Re Isaiah F. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(B)(ii) — 3 cases
In Re Victoria H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Whisper B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(a)(iv) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(ii) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(9)(vi) — 5 cases
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
In re H.E.J., 124 S.W.3d 110 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Hej, 124 S.W.3d 110 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Cloey R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(A) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(A)(iii) — 1 case
In Re B.d., R.M.T. & V.F.T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(A)(vi) — 1 case
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(Z) — 1 case
In Re: Kaliyah S., 455 S.W.3d 533 (Tenn. 2015). “5 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(4) (2014) (listing severe abuse in dependency and neglect proceedings as ground for termination of parental rights); id.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(h) — 2 cases
In Re: Braelyn S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
In Re Nakayia S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(i) — 1 case
In Re: Kaliyah S., 455 S.W.3d 533 (Tenn. 2015). “5 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(4) (2014) (listing severe abuse in dependency and neglect proceedings as ground for termination of parental rights); id.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(l) — 1 case
In Re Carrington H., 483 S.W.3d 507 (Tenn. 2016). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(3). 8 Termination of parental rights is permissible if clear and convincing evidence establishes that: (i) The parent or guardian of the child is incompetent to adequately provide for the further care and supervision of the child because the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(g)(l)(8) — 1 case
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(h) — 7 cases
In re A.W., 114 S.W.3d 541 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Aw, 114 S.W.3d 541 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Sla, 223 S.W.3d 295 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Eddie Dorris v. Jeffery Crisp (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
In the Matter of: M.C.G. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(h)(1)(D) — 1 case
In Re Lorelai E. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(h)(2) — 2 cases
In Re: Kaliyah S., 455 S.W.3d 533 (Tenn. 2015). “5 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(4) (2014) (listing severe abuse in dependency and neglect proceedings as ground for termination of parental rights); id.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(h)(2)(C) — 2 cases
In Re Bernard T., 319 S.W.3d 586 (Tenn. 2010). “This appeal involves a termination of rights proceeding under Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (Supp.2009) with regard to five children between the ages of twelve and seventeen.”
In re Domingo W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i) — 531 cases
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Carrington H., 483 S.W.3d 507 (Tenn. 2016). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(3). 8 Termination of parental rights is permissible if clear and convincing evidence establishes that: (i) The parent or guardian of the child is incompetent to adequately provide for the further care and supervision of the child because the…”
In Re Addalyne S., 556 S.W.3d 774 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “2005) (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)). Thus, a party seeking to terminate a parent’s rights must prove (1) existence of one of the statutory grounds and (2) that termination is in the child’s best interest.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1) — 123 cases
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Giorgianna H., 205 S.W.3d 508 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
In Re Mo, 173 S.W.3d 13 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re Mar, 183 S.W.3d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re Marterrio H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(A) — 19 cases
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Magnus H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Da'Moni J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
In Re Metric D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Whisper B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(B) — 12 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Violet L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re: Oriana Y. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2023).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(C) — 20 cases
In Re Whisper B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(D) — 17 cases
In Re Whisper B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re: Ayzelee G. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(E) — 13 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bentley W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Doerrian K. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(F) — 14 cases
In Re Colten B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Liberty T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Emmeline C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Layton S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(G) — 7 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Magnus H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(H) — 20 cases
In Re Whisper B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(I) — 12 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bentley W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(J) — 19 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bentley W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(K) — 15 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Magnus H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(L) — 10 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Magnus H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(M) — 16 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Magnus H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(N) — 14 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re: Ayzelee G. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(O) — 19 cases
In Re Violet R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(P) — 15 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Magnus H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(Q) — 15 cases
In Re Silva F. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Tamiria M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(R) — 10 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Violet L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(S) — 18 cases
In Re Violet R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bentley W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Zaniyah C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(1)(T) — 11 cases
In Re Dayson A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Bella H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Hunter W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Violet L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
In Re Rome W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(2) — 62 cases
In Re: Kaliyah S., 455 S.W.3d 533 (Tenn. 2015). “5 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(4) (2014) (listing severe abuse in dependency and neglect proceedings as ground for termination of parental rights); id.”
In re Scott H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In re M.E.T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re: John J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Ja'Miya T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(2002) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(2017) — 1 case
In Re Nathan C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(3) — 68 cases
In re M.E.T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Ja'Miya T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Marterrio H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Antonio J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Autumn D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(4) — 62 cases
In Re: Taylor B. W., 397 S.W.3d 105 (Tenn. 2013). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (0(3). The trial court further found that Mother enjoyed a relationship with the children until Stepmother became involved although the younger daughter testified that she had few memories of Mother.”
In Re Mar, 183 S.W.3d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re: Alexis C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).
In re Scott H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In re M.E.T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(5) — 73 cases
In Re: Taylor B. W., 397 S.W.3d 105 (Tenn. 2013). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (0(3). The trial court further found that Mother enjoyed a relationship with the children until Stepmother became involved although the younger daughter testified that she had few memories of Mother.”
In Re Mar, 183 S.W.3d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re: Alexis C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).
In re Scott H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In re M.E.T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(6) — 58 cases
In Re: Taylor B. W., 397 S.W.3d 105 (Tenn. 2013). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (0(3). The trial court further found that Mother enjoyed a relationship with the children until Stepmother became involved although the younger daughter testified that she had few memories of Mother.”
In Re Addalyne S., 556 S.W.3d 774 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “2005) (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)). Thus, a party seeking to terminate a parent’s rights must prove (1) existence of one of the statutory grounds and (2) that termination is in the child’s best interest.”
In Re Mo, 173 S.W.3d 13 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re Mar, 183 S.W.3d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re: Alexis C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(7) — 62 cases
In Re: Taylor B. W., 397 S.W.3d 105 (Tenn. 2013). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (0(3). The trial court further found that Mother enjoyed a relationship with the children until Stepmother became involved although the younger daughter testified that she had few memories of Mother.”
In Re Kailey A. (2022).
In re Scott H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In re M.E.T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Ja'Miya T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(8) — 50 cases
In Re Mar, 183 S.W.3d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In re Scott H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In re M.E.T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Ja'Miya T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Marterrio H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(9) — 35 cases
In re Scott H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In re M.E.T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Ja'Miya T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Marterrio H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
In Re Charles B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(A) — 5 cases
In Re Taron H. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
In Re Lucas S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Jaxen F. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Gracelyn H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
IN Re Zae'Alei R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(C) — 5 cases
In Re Taiden B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Taron H. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
In Re Lucas S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Jaxen F. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Gracelyn H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(G) — 1 case
In Re Liam M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(J) — 1 case
In Re Mia C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(O) — 1 case
In Re Mitchell C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(i)(l) — 2 cases
In re M.A.R., 183 S.W.3d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re: Alexis C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(j) — 3 cases
In Re Mjb, 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re: Isobel v. O. & Bree'Ana J.A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(k) — 107 cases
White v. Moody, 171 S.W.3d 187 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d 838 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When a lower court has failed to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (k), the appellate courts must remand the case with directions to prepare the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
In Re Carrington H., 483 S.W.3d 507 (Tenn. 2016). “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(3). 8 Termination of parental rights is permissible if clear and convincing evidence establishes that: (i) The parent or guardian of the child is incompetent to adequately provide for the further care and supervision of the child because the…”
In re Navada N., 498 S.W.3d 579 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
In Re Marr, 194 S.W.3d 490 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Because the stakes are so profoundly high, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (c)(1) requires persons seeking to terminate a biological parent's parental rights to prove the statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(k)(1)(A) — 1 case
In Re Michael S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(l) — 2 cases
In Re: Kaliyah S., 455 S.W.3d 533 (Tenn. 2015). “5 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (g)(4) (2014) (listing severe abuse in dependency and neglect proceedings as ground for termination of parental rights); id.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(l)(1) — 19 cases
Osborn v. Marr, 127 S.W.3d 737 (Tenn. 2004).
In re M.J.B., 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “The Appellate Record in Termination Cases Like many other appeals from decisions to terminate parental rights under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113 , the record in this case contains many extraneous documents *651 that are not properly includable in the record on appeal.”
Means v. Ashby, 130 S.W.3d 48 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
In Re Anthony R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
In Re Frankie v. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(l)(1)(2003) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(l)(l) — 1 case
In the Matter OF Derrick B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(m) — 5 cases
In Re: Kira D. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
Dockery v. State (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
In Re: Dmd & Jla (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Alexis S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(n) — 5 cases
State Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Owens, 129 S.W.3d 50 (Tenn. 2004).
In re K.A.Y, 80 S.W.3d 19 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
In The Matter of S.L.O. (Tenn. 2004).
Dept. of Child. Serv. v. Sarah Owens (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
In Re Brilee E. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(q) — 17 cases
In Re Adoption of A.M.H., 215 S.W.3d 793 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-1-113 (2005). 5 . Although the legislature has the power to enact statutes of limitation barring relief on complaints filed beyond the limitations period, see Maestas v.”
State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. T.M.B.K., 197 S.W.3d 282 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
In Re Mjb, 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
Stephanie D. Turner v. Kevin Turner (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).
Stephanie D. Turner v. Kevin Turner (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.