Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 (2026)

Ex parte protection order - Hearing - Extension

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1115, s 5, eff. 7/1/2022.

Acts 1979, ch. 350, § 5; T.C.A., § 36-1205; Acts 1987, ch. 270, § 6; 1997 , ch. 459, §§ 2, 4, 5; 1998, ch. 715, § 2; 2004, ch. 588, § 2; 2005, ch. 75, § 1; 2005, ch. 381, § 4; 2006, ch. 676, § 1; 2006, ch. 871, § 2; 2007 , ch. 348, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 76 cases (29 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Shayla Nicole Purifoy v. Devine Mafa, 556 S.W.3d 170 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
Shayla Nicole Purifoy v. Devine Mafa, 556 S.W.3d 170 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 20× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 (emphasis added).”
Kite v. Kite, 22 S.W.3d 803 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 12× “She further requested that a hearing be set within ten days pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-605 and that notice be served upon the respondent.”
Sherry Jones v. Union Cnty., Tennessee Union Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 296 F.3d 417 (6th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3× “Under Tennessee law, Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-605, a hearing on the domestic protection order must be held within fifteen days of service of the order, and the party served must be given at least five days notice of the hearing.”
Clark v. Crow, 37 S.W.3d 919 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 10× “We grant this interlocutory appeal to consider a question of first impression regarding whether there is a right to jury trial prior to the issuance of an order of protection pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-3-605, (hereinafter “order of protection”).”
Lorna Mae Gibson v. Charles William Bikas, 556 S.W.3d 796 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 (b) (providing that if a petitioner “has proved the allegation of domestic abuse, stalking or sexual assault by a preponderance of the evidence,” an ex parte order of protection may be extended for a “definite period of time, not to exceed one (1)…”
Cheryl Autry v. James Autry, 83 S.W.3d 785 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 (a). Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-3-605 provides: (a) Upon the filing of a petition under this part, the courts may immediately, for good cause shown, issue an ex parte order of protection.”
Jacqueline G. Furlong v. Kevin Keane Furlong, 370 S.W.3d 329 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-605(d) (2010) provides, in part, as follows: .”
Cable v. Clemmons, 36 S.W.3d 39 (Tenn. 2001). “§ 36-3-605(a) (1996 & Supp.1999). Within 15 days of service on the respondent, the court shall hold a hearing and either dissolve the ex parte order, if one had been issued, or extend the order of protection for a definite period of time not to exceed one year.”
State v. Armstrong, 256 S.W.3d 243 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). “§ 36-3-609, if the respondent to a petition for an order of protection has been served with a copy of the petition, notice of hearing, and any ex parte order issued pursuant to § 36-3-605(c), an order of protection “shall be effective when the order is entered.”
Matthew L. Armitage v. Andrea L. Kasulis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 62× “28, 2023), requires petitioners -5- seeking orders of protection not only to satisfy the statutory requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 , but also to prove an “ongoing existing danger.”
Matthew L. Armitage v. Ginny Hale (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 58× “28, 2023), requires petitioners -5- seeking orders of protection not only to satisfy the statutory requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 but also to prove an “ongoing existing danger.”
Katherine Wehr Johnson v. Dustin Faeder (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 34× “]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 (b). The general sessions court ruled that the initial order of protection shall remain in effect until the trial court resolved the matter, which the trial court did on February 9, 2024.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605(a) — 10 cases
Shayla Nicole Purifoy v. Devine Mafa, 556 S.W.3d 170 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 (emphasis added).”
Kite v. Kite, 22 S.W.3d 803 (Tenn. 1997). “She further requested that a hearing be set within ten days pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-605 and that notice be served upon the respondent.”
Cheryl Autry v. James Autry, 83 S.W.3d 785 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 (a). Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-3-605 provides: (a) Upon the filing of a petition under this part, the courts may immediately, for good cause shown, issue an ex parte order of protection.”
Cable v. Clemmons, 36 S.W.3d 39 (Tenn. 2001). “§ 36-3-605(a) (1996 & Supp.1999). Within 15 days of service on the respondent, the court shall hold a hearing and either dissolve the ex parte order, if one had been issued, or extend the order of protection for a definite period of time not to exceed one year.”
James Swanger v. Carrie Lowery (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605(b) — 9 cases
Kite v. Kite, 22 S.W.3d 803 (Tenn. 1997). “She further requested that a hearing be set within ten days pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-605 and that notice be served upon the respondent.”
Matthew L. Armitage v. Andrea L. Kasulis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “28, 2023), requires petitioners -5- seeking orders of protection not only to satisfy the statutory requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 , but also to prove an “ongoing existing danger.”
Matthew L. Armitage v. Ginny Hale (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “28, 2023), requires petitioners -5- seeking orders of protection not only to satisfy the statutory requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 but also to prove an “ongoing existing danger.”
Katherine Wehr Johnson v. Dustin Faeder (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 (b). The general sessions court ruled that the initial order of protection shall remain in effect until the trial court resolved the matter, which the trial court did on February 9, 2024.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605(c) — 4 cases
State v. Armstrong, 256 S.W.3d 243 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). “§ 36-3-609, if the respondent to a petition for an order of protection has been served with a copy of the petition, notice of hearing, and any ex parte order issued pursuant to § 36-3-605(c), an order of protection “shall be effective when the order is entered.”
Debra Tipton v. John Harris (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605(d) — 6 cases
Jacqueline G. Furlong v. Kevin Keane Furlong, 370 S.W.3d 329 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-605(d) (2010) provides, in part, as follows: .”
Katherine Wehr Johnson v. Dustin Faeder (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-605 (b). The general sessions court ruled that the initial order of protection shall remain in effect until the trial court resolved the matter, which the trial court did on February 9, 2024.”
James Swanger v. Carrie Lowery (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.