Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (2026)

Violation of order or consent agreement - Civil or criminal contempt - Financial penalty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1979, ch. 350, § 12; T.C.A., § 36-1212; Acts 1989, ch. 297, § 1; 1994, ch. 858, § 1; 1995, ch. 127, § 1; 2010 , ch. 1094, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2024 · leading case: Cable v. Clemmons, 36 S.W.3d 39 (Tenn. 2001).
Cable v. Clemmons, 36 S.W.3d 39 (Tenn. 2001). · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (a) (1996). The statutes also provide that the failure to attend counseling sessions as directed in an order of protection “may be punished as criminal or civil contempt.”
Jacqueline G. Furlong v. Kevin Keane Furlong, 370 S.W.3d 329 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “Courts are informed by Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-610(a)(2010), that they may hold a person who violates an order of protection “in civil or criminal contempt and punish the defendant in accordance with the law.”
State v. Winningham, 958 S.W.2d 740 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 3× “The trial court imposed punishment for both civil contempt and criminal contempt, pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 36-3-610 (1991) and 29-9-105 (1980).”
State v. Gray, 46 S.W.3d 749 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-610(a) gives the general sessions court the power to enforce the order of the circuit court.”
Stephanie Nichole Lee v. Christopher Cornell Eskridge (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 7× “E2014-02555-COA-R3-CV-FILED-FEBRUARY 26, 2016 The trial court, upon finding that Christopher Cornell Eskridge (Respondent) repeatedly violated orders of protection issued to protect Stephanie Nicole Lee (Petitioner), sentenced him to ten days in jail and required him to post a…”
Toniann Whitaker v. James B. Devereaux (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (b)(2). Following a hearing on August 14, 2017, the trial court entered an order resolving some of Ms.”
Toniann Whitaker v. James B. Devereaux (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (b)(2). Following a hearing on August 14, 2017, the trial court entered an order resolving some of Ms.”
Kisha Dean Trezevant v. Stanley H. Trezevant, III (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “8 (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (a)).7 The Tennessee Supreme Court went on to explain that “conduct qualifying as contempt under these provisions constitutes a violation of the general criminal laws[.”
State of Tennessee v. Karen Ann Matthews (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “§ 36-3-610(a) (“Upon violation of the order of protection or a court-approved consent agreement, the court may hold the defendant in civil or criminal contempt and punish the defendant in accordance with the law.”
State of Tennessee v. Scotty Henry Pace, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (a) (Supp. 2001).”
State of Tennessee v. Scotty Henry Pace, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Pace appeals contending the evidence insufficient to sustain a finding of guilt.2 A court may hold a defendant in criminal contempt, and punish the defendant accordingly, upon a finding the defendant violated an order of protection or a court-approved consent agreement.”
Anna Lois Long v. Sammy Lee Brown (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “We further hold that the trial court’s order should also be modified to include “the statement of the maximum penalty that may be imposed pursuant to § 36-3-610 for violating [the] order” as required by Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610(2) — 1 case
Stephanie Nichole Lee v. Christopher Cornell Eskridge (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “E2014-02555-COA-R3-CV-FILED-FEBRUARY 26, 2016 The trial court, upon finding that Christopher Cornell Eskridge (Respondent) repeatedly violated orders of protection issued to protect Stephanie Nicole Lee (Petitioner), sentenced him to ten days in jail and required him to post a…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610(a) — 5 cases
State v. Gray, 46 S.W.3d 749 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-610(a) gives the general sessions court the power to enforce the order of the circuit court.”
Cable v. Clemmons, 36 S.W.3d 39 (Tenn. 2001). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (a) (1996). The statutes also provide that the failure to attend counseling sessions as directed in an order of protection “may be punished as criminal or civil contempt.”
Kisha Dean Trezevant v. Stanley H. Trezevant, III (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024). “8 (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (a)).7 The Tennessee Supreme Court went on to explain that “conduct qualifying as contempt under these provisions constitutes a violation of the general criminal laws[.”
State of Tennessee v. Karen Ann Matthews (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011). “§ 36-3-610(a) (“Upon violation of the order of protection or a court-approved consent agreement, the court may hold the defendant in civil or criminal contempt and punish the defendant in accordance with the law.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610(a)(2010) — 1 case
Jacqueline G. Furlong v. Kevin Keane Furlong, 370 S.W.3d 329 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “Courts are informed by Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-3-610(a)(2010), that they may hold a person who violates an order of protection “in civil or criminal contempt and punish the defendant in accordance with the law.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610(b) — 3 cases
Cable v. Clemmons, 36 S.W.3d 39 (Tenn. 2001). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (a) (1996). The statutes also provide that the failure to attend counseling sessions as directed in an order of protection “may be punished as criminal or civil contempt.”
Toniann Whitaker v. James B. Devereaux (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (b)(2). Following a hearing on August 14, 2017, the trial court entered an order resolving some of Ms.”
Toniann Whitaker v. James B. Devereaux (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-610 (b)(2). Following a hearing on August 14, 2017, the trial court entered an order resolving some of Ms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.