Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101 (2026)

Grounds for divorce from bonds of matrimony

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Code 1858, § 2448 (deriv. Acts 1819, ch. 20, § 2; 1835-1836, ch. 26, §§ 1, 2; 1841-1842, ch. 133, § 3; 1843-1844, ch. 176, § 1); Acts 1867-1868, ch. 63, § 1; 1867-1868, ch. 68, § 1; Shan., § 4201; mod. Code 1932, § 8426; Acts 1961, ch. 168, § 1; 1972, ch. 679, § 1; 1977, ch. 107, § 1; 1978, ch. 577, § 1; 1981, ch. 311, § 1; 1981, ch. 420, § 1; 1981, ch. 532, § 1; 1982, ch. 853, § 2; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 36-801(I); Acts 1985, ch. 178, § 1; 1989, ch. 393, § 1; 1998, ch. 1059, §1; 2007 , ch. 519, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 141 cases (19 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 51× “Earls failed to carry his burden of proving the existence of one of the grounds for divorce in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101 (Supp.1999). Second, the trial court concluded that the parties should not be divorced *882 because Ms.”
Blackburn v. Blackburn, 270 S.W.3d 42 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 8× “Grounds for Divorce When filing a complaint for divorce, the complaint must allege the grounds for divorce as enumerated in Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-4-101. Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (2005).”
Thompson v. Thompson, 797 S.W.2d 599 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “Adultery and bigamy are no longer complete bars to a spouse's right to seek a divorce on one of the grounds in Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-102 (1984) or one of the nofault grounds in Tenn.”
Chaffin v. Ellis, 211 S.W.3d 264 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Both parties in this case alleged that the other was guilty of inappropriate marital conduct. Inappropriate marital conduct can be found when “[t]he husband or the wife is guilty of such cruel and inhuman treatment or conduct towards the spouse as renders cohabitation unsafe and…”
State v. Cooper, 718 S.W.2d 256 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 4× “The ground alleged in the petition was that of "irreconcilable differences" as authorized in T.C.A. § 36-4-101(11). The complaint was filed according to the procedure prescribed in T.”
Ingram v. Ingram, 721 S.W.2d 262 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “As a part of the divorce decree awarding the appellee a divorce on the statutory *263 ground of three years separation, T.C.A. § 36-4-101(12), the trial judge divided the marital property and awarded the appellant alimony at $2,000.”
Charlotte Scott Forbess v. Michael E. Forbess, 370 S.W.3d 347 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “(b) The court may, upon stipulation to or proof of any ground of divorce pursuant to § 36-4-101, grant a divorce to the party who was less at fault or, if either or both parties are entitled to a divorce or if a divorce is to be granted on the grounds of irreconcilable…”
Michael D.C. v. Wanda L.C., 497 S.E.2d 531 (W. Va. 1997). “§ 25-4-2(1) (1992); Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101(3) (1996); Tex.”
Cary v. Cary, 937 S.W.2d 777 (Tenn. 1996). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101(11) (1991 Repl.”
Hill v. Hill, 152 S.W.3d 543 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101 (2001) provides, in pertinent part, that [t]he following are causes of divorce from the bonds of matrimony: [[Image here]] (11) The husband or wife is guilty of such cruel and inhuman treatment or conduct towards the spouse as renders cohabitation…”
Bolin v. Bolin, 99 S.W.3d 102 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101(11) (2001). Essentially, inappropriate marital conduct is where “either or both of the parties [have] engaged in a course of conduct which (1) caused pain, anguish or distress to the other party and (2) rendered continued cohabitation ‘improper,’…”
Jekot v. Jekot, 232 S.W.3d 744 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “§ 36-4-129(b), a trial court is given the discretion to grant a divorce to either or both of the parties as follows: The court may, upon stipulation to or proof of any ground for divorce pursuant to § 36-4-101, grant a divorce to the party who was less at fault or, if either or…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(11) — 17 cases
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Earls failed to carry his burden of proving the existence of one of the grounds for divorce in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101 (Supp.1999). Second, the trial court concluded that the parties should not be divorced *882 because Ms.”
Blackburn v. Blackburn, 270 S.W.3d 42 (Tenn. 2008). “Grounds for Divorce When filing a complaint for divorce, the complaint must allege the grounds for divorce as enumerated in Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-4-101. Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (2005).”
Chaffin v. Ellis, 211 S.W.3d 264 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Both parties in this case alleged that the other was guilty of inappropriate marital conduct. Inappropriate marital conduct can be found when “[t]he husband or the wife is guilty of such cruel and inhuman treatment or conduct towards the spouse as renders cohabitation unsafe and…”
State v. Cooper, 718 S.W.2d 256 (Tenn. 1986). “The ground alleged in the petition was that of "irreconcilable differences" as authorized in T.C.A. § 36-4-101(11). The complaint was filed according to the procedure prescribed in T.”
Cary v. Cary, 937 S.W.2d 777 (Tenn. 1996). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101(11) (1991 Repl.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(12) — 9 cases
Ingram v. Ingram, 721 S.W.2d 262 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). “As a part of the divorce decree awarding the appellee a divorce on the statutory *263 ground of three years separation, T.C.A. § 36-4-101(12), the trial judge divided the marital property and awarded the appellant alimony at $2,000.”
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Earls failed to carry his burden of proving the existence of one of the grounds for divorce in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101 (Supp.1999). Second, the trial court concluded that the parties should not be divorced *882 because Ms.”
Harwell v. Harwell, 762 S.W.2d 140 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988).
Thomasson v. Thomasson, 755 S.W.2d 779 (Tenn. 1988).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(13) — 1 case
In Re Est. of Dante Lamar Edmonds (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(14) — 6 cases
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Earls failed to carry his burden of proving the existence of one of the grounds for divorce in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101 (Supp.1999). Second, the trial court concluded that the parties should not be divorced *882 because Ms.”
Blackburn v. Blackburn, 270 S.W.3d 42 (Tenn. 2008). “Grounds for Divorce When filing a complaint for divorce, the complaint must allege the grounds for divorce as enumerated in Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-4-101. Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (2005).”
Nancy M. Houston v. Rocky J. Houston (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
Clark Earls v. Shirley Earls (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(15) — 4 cases
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Earls failed to carry his burden of proving the existence of one of the grounds for divorce in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101 (Supp.1999). Second, the trial court concluded that the parties should not be divorced *882 because Ms.”
Clark Earls v. Shirley Earls (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(2) — 1 case
Janna Sheya Falk v. Geary Falk (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(3) — 6 cases
Michael D.C. v. Wanda L.C., 497 S.E.2d 531 (W. Va. 1997). “§ 25-4-2(1) (1992); Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101(3) (1996); Tex.”
Robert A. Stolze v. Janet F. Stolze (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(5) — 2 cases
Nancy M. Houston v. Rocky J. Houston (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(6) — 1 case
Tony Makoka v. Wendy Makoka-Mhlanga (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(a) — 1 case
Hem Raj Singh v. Neeta Singh (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(a)(1) — 2 cases
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Earls failed to carry his burden of proving the existence of one of the grounds for divorce in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-101 (Supp.1999). Second, the trial court concluded that the parties should not be divorced *882 because Ms.”
Clark Earls v. Shirley Earls (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(a)(11) — 2 cases
George Edwards v. Alice Edwards (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(a)(13) — 7 cases
In Re Est. of Dante Lamar Edmonds (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(a)(15) — 2 cases
Cathy Turnbo Franks v. Ronald Franks (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
Cathy Turnbo Franks v. Ronald Franks (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(a)(3) — 3 cases
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-101(a)(6) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.