Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-116 (2026)

Establishment of central collection and disbursement unit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1998, ch. 1048, § 3; 2000, ch. 909, § 2; 2000, ch. 922, § 41; 2002, ch. 674, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 2001–2014 · leading case: State of Tennessee, ex rel, Ashley Mitchell v. Patrick D. Armstrong (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
State of Tennessee, ex rel, Ashley Mitchell v. Patrick D. Armstrong (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 8× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-116 (a)(1) (2001 & Supp.”
Larry Butler v. Gwendolyn Butler (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 7× “§ 6546 ; Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-116 (a)(1) (2001).”
State of Tennessee ex rel. Wendy S. Rushing v. Christopher B. Spain (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 5× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-116 (2005); State ex rel.”
Jacqueline Patterson v. Richard French (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 5× “-4- Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-116 (a)(1). The language of the statute is mandatory, directing that all orders in Title IV-D cases “shall be deemed to require that the support be sent” to the State disbursement unit.”
State of Tennessee ex rel. Mary Lott v. Ernest Lott, III (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “-3- payment procedure contrary to the requirements of § 36-5-116, . . . whether or not approved by the court, shall be void and of no effect.”
State of Tennessee ex rel. Margaret Estelle Mitchell v. Ray Allen Lea State of Tennessee ex rel. Katherine A. Yarbrough v. William R. Johnson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-116 (a)(1) (2001 & Supp.”
State of Tennessee, ex rel., Connie Mitchell v. Percy Mitchell (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “all Title IV-D child or spousal support cases in which payment of child or spousal support is to be made by income assignment, or otherwise, and in all cases where payments made by income assignment based upon support orders entered on or after January 1, 1994, that are not…”
State of Tennessee, ex.rel. Vikki Davis v. John Davis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-116 (2002 & Supp. 2003) (establishing the Tennessee Department of Human Services as Tennessee’s central collection and disbursement unit, as required by federal statute, receiving the 5% processing fee).”
Michael Wallace Sherrod v. Tennessee Dep't of Human Serv. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “All order[s] in Title IV-D support cases, and all orders for income assignments which have directed support to be paid to the clerk of any court, and which are subject to the provisions of 42 U.”
In Re: Aaron E. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “The Juvenile Court admitted both documents into evidence under Tennessee Code Annotated section 24-7-121(a), which provides as follows: (a)(1)(A) The department of human services child support payment records shall be the official records for all payments which have been…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-116(a)(1) — 3 cases
State of Tennessee ex rel. Mary Lott v. Ernest Lott, III (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “-3- payment procedure contrary to the requirements of § 36-5-116, . . . whether or not approved by the court, shall be void and of no effect.”
Larry Butler v. Gwendolyn Butler (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 6546 ; Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-116 (a)(1) (2001).”
Michael Wallace Sherrod v. Tennessee Dep't of Human Serv. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “All order[s] in Title IV-D support cases, and all orders for income assignments which have directed support to be paid to the clerk of any court, and which are subject to the provisions of 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.