Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402 (2026)

Part definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this part, unless the context requires otherwise:

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 83,s 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Acts 1997, ch. 557, § 1; 2000, ch. 889, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 84 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Andrew K. Armbrister v. Melissa H. Armbrister, 414 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2013).
Andrew K. Armbrister v. Melissa H. Armbrister, 414 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 6× “Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-402(2)(A)-(F), "[p]arenting responsibilities,” "the establishment of which is the objective of a permanent parenting plan,” include: (A) Providing for the child's emotional care and stability, including maintaining a loving, stable,…”
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 152 S.W.3d 447 (Tenn. 2004). · cites it 12× “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-6-402(4) (2001) (emphasis added).”
Rivero v. Rivero, 216 P.3d 213 (Nev. 2009). · cites it 4× “This focus on residency is consistent with NRS 125C.010, which requires that a court, when ordering visitation, specify the “habitual residence” of the child.”
Gray v. Gray, 78 S.W.3d 881 (Tenn. 2002). · cites it 7× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402 (3) (2001). Awards of child support are generally governed by the Child Support Guidelines promulgated by the Tennessee Department of Human Services Child Support Services Division.”
Burden v. Burden, 250 S.W.3d 899 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” T.C.A. § 36-6-402. 9 . We decline to rule on the issue, raised by Wife, of whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant Wife's motion to reconsider and/or in failing to hear Dr.”
Kawatra v. Kawatra, 182 S.W.3d 800 (Tenn. 2005). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-6-402(5) (2001) (defining the "[rjesiden-tial schedule” in a parenting plan as "the schedule of when the child is in each parent’s physical care”).”
In Re Hogue, 286 S.W.3d 890 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× “The Trustee contends that Tennessee statutory law, as set forth at Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-402(4) (2005), indicates that only one parent may be the primary residential parent, and therefore, even if the enhanced exemption is available to a married couple, only one…”
Robert Lee Melvin v. Wendy Ann Melvin, 415 S.W.3d 847 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “s best interest, and the court may preclude or limit any provisions of a parenting plan, if any of the following limiting factors are found to exist after a hearing: (1) A parent’s neglect or substantial nonperformance of parenting responsibilities; (2) An emotional or physical…”
Deborah Ann hansen v. Ole Hansen (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 22× “” See T.C.A. § 36-6-402(1) and (5). See also T.”
Jennifer Rebecca Creswell Henegar v. Jason Adam Henegar (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 8× “15, 2004) (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402 (5); Hopkins v.”
Brent Dewayne Carr v. Kellie Renea Carr (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 7× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402 (3) (2017). The residential schedule is to include the designation of the primary residential parent (section 36-6-402(5)), defined as the parent with whom the child resides more than 50% of the time (section 36-6-402(4)), and in developing the plan,…”
Jade C. Nunnally v. Adam Nunnally (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-404 (a). A permanent parenting plan is “a written plan for the parenting and best interests of the child, including the allocation of parenting responsibilities and the establishment of a residential schedule.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402(1) — 2 cases
Deborah Ann hansen v. Ole Hansen (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “” See T.C.A. § 36-6-402(1) and (5). See also T.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402(2) — 2 cases
Edna Gergel v. James Gergel (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402(2)(A) — 1 case
Andrew K. Armbrister v. Melissa H. Armbrister, 414 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2013). “Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-402(2)(A)-(F), "[p]arenting responsibilities,” "the establishment of which is the objective of a permanent parenting plan,” include: (A) Providing for the child's emotional care and stability, including maintaining a loving, stable,…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402(3) — 12 cases
Andrew K. Armbrister v. Melissa H. Armbrister, 414 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2013). “Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-402(2)(A)-(F), "[p]arenting responsibilities,” "the establishment of which is the objective of a permanent parenting plan,” include: (A) Providing for the child's emotional care and stability, including maintaining a loving, stable,…”
In Re Jaxon W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402(3)(2000) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402(4) — 12 cases
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 152 S.W.3d 447 (Tenn. 2004). “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-6-402(4) (2001) (emphasis added).”
Rivero v. Rivero, 216 P.3d 213 (Nev. 2009). “This focus on residency is consistent with NRS 125C.010, which requires that a court, when ordering visitation, specify the “habitual residence” of the child.”
Andrew K. Armbrister v. Melissa H. Armbrister, 414 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2013). “Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-402(2)(A)-(F), "[p]arenting responsibilities,” "the establishment of which is the objective of a permanent parenting plan,” include: (A) Providing for the child's emotional care and stability, including maintaining a loving, stable,…”
Gray v. Gray, 78 S.W.3d 881 (Tenn. 2002). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402 (3) (2001). Awards of child support are generally governed by the Child Support Guidelines promulgated by the Tennessee Department of Human Services Child Support Services Division.”
In Re Hogue, 286 S.W.3d 890 (Tenn. 2009). “The Trustee contends that Tennessee statutory law, as set forth at Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-402(4) (2005), indicates that only one parent may be the primary residential parent, and therefore, even if the enhanced exemption is available to a married couple, only one…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402(5) — 12 cases
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 152 S.W.3d 447 (Tenn. 2004). “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-6-402(4) (2001) (emphasis added).”
Andrew K. Armbrister v. Melissa H. Armbrister, 414 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2013). “Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-402(2)(A)-(F), "[p]arenting responsibilities,” "the establishment of which is the objective of a permanent parenting plan,” include: (A) Providing for the child's emotional care and stability, including maintaining a loving, stable,…”
Kawatra v. Kawatra, 182 S.W.3d 800 (Tenn. 2005). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-6-402(5) (2001) (defining the "[rjesiden-tial schedule” in a parenting plan as "the schedule of when the child is in each parent’s physical care”).”
Gray v. Gray, 78 S.W.3d 881 (Tenn. 2002). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402 (3) (2001). Awards of child support are generally governed by the Child Support Guidelines promulgated by the Tennessee Department of Human Services Child Support Services Division.”
Deborah Ann hansen v. Ole Hansen (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “” See T.C.A. § 36-6-402(1) and (5). See also T.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-6-402(6) — 1 case
Deborah Ann hansen v. Ole Hansen (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “” See T.C.A. § 36-6-402(1) and (5). See also T.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.