Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-103 (2026)
Exclusive original jurisdiction
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) The juvenile court has exclusive original jurisdiction of the following proceedings, which are governed by this part:
- (1) Proceedings in which a child is alleged to:
- (A) Be delinquent, except when a child is alleged to have committed an act that would, if adjudicated delinquent, require the child to be classified as a serious youthful offender pursuant to § 37-1-131(g);
- (B) Be unruly;
- (C) Be dependent and neglected; or
- (D) Have committed a juvenile traffic offense as defined in § 37-1-146;
- (2) Proceedings arising under §§ 37-1-141 - 37-1-144;
- (3) Proceedings arising under § 37-1-137 for the purposes of termination of a home placement;
- (4) Prosecutions under § 37-1-412, unless the case is bound over to the grand jury by the juvenile court or the defendant is originally charged with a greater offense of which violation of § 37-1-412 is a lesser included offense;
- (5) Proceedings arising under [former] § 49-5-5209(e) [repealed];
- (6) Proceedings in which a parent or legal guardian is alleged to have violated parental responsibilities pursuant to § 37-1-174; and
- (7) Proceedings arising under § 37-1-190(e).
- (1) Proceedings in which a child is alleged to:
- (b) The juvenile court also has exclusive original jurisdiction of the following proceedings, which are governed by the laws relating thereto without regard to the other provisions of this part:
- (1) Proceedings to obtain judicial consent to employment, or enlistment in the armed services of a child, if consent is required by law;
- (2) Proceedings under the Interstate Compact for Juveniles, compiled as chapter 4, part 1 of this title; and
- (3) Proceedings under the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children, compiled as chapter 4, part 2 of this title.
- (c) Except as provided in subsection (d), when jurisdiction has been acquired under this part, jurisdiction continues until the case has been dismissed, or until the custody determination is transferred to another juvenile, circuit, chancery, or general sessions court exercising domestic relations jurisdiction, or until a petition for adoption is filed regarding the child in question as set out in § 36-1-116(f). A juvenile court retains jurisdiction to the extent needed to complete any reviews or permanency hearings for children in foster care as may be mandated by federal or state law; however, only the adoption court has jurisdiction to modify visitation or custody of the child while the adoption remains pending. This subsection (c) does not establish concurrent jurisdiction for any other court to hear juvenile cases, but permits courts exercising domestic relations jurisdiction to make custody determinations in accordance with this part.
- (d)
- (1) A juvenile court in any county of this state shall have temporary jurisdiction to issue temporary orders pursuant to this section upon a petition on behalf of a child present or residing in that county. Upon being informed that a proceeding pertaining to the same child has been commenced in or a determination pertaining to the same child has been made by a court of a county having prior jurisdiction under this part; provided, that the court having temporary jurisdiction shall immediately notify and attempt to communicate with the court having original jurisdiction regarding the status of the child before issuing any temporary order hereunder, the courts shall coordinate with one another to resolve any jurisdictional issues, protect the best interests of the child, and determine the duration of any order entered by a court pursuant to this section.
- (2) A court shall have temporary jurisdiction pursuant to this subsection (d) only in a neglect, dependency or abuse proceeding, a termination of parental rights proceeding or an order of protection pursuant to title 36, pertaining to the child whose matter is before the court when the court determines it is necessary to protect the best interests of that child by action of that court.
- (3) Upon notice that a proceeding pertaining to the child has been commenced in a court in a county having prior jurisdiction under this part or upon notice that there is a previous determination pertaining to the child that is entitled to be enforced under this part:
- (A) The court exercising temporary jurisdiction shall attempt to communicate with the prior court having jurisdiction and resolve jurisdictional issues and determine whether jurisdiction should transfer to the court exercising temporary jurisdiction;
- (B) If jurisdiction is not transferred to the court exercising temporary jurisdiction, the orders of the court exercising temporary jurisdiction shall remain in force and effect until an order is obtained from the court having prior jurisdiction regarding the child;
- (C) If jurisdiction is not transferred to the court exercising temporary jurisdiction, the court exercising temporary jurisdiction under this part, either upon motion by a party or on its own, shall enter an order specifying the period of time that the court considers adequate to allow the parties to resume the proceeding in the court having prior jurisdiction under this part; and
- (D) If jurisdiction is transferred to the court exercising temporary jurisdiction, all matters thereafter pertaining to the child shall be within the jurisdiction of that court.
- (e) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, transfers under this section shall be at the sole discretion of the juvenile court. In all other cases, jurisdiction shall continue until a person is no longer a child as defined in § 37-1-102.
- (f) The court is authorized to require any parent or legal guardian of a child within the jurisdiction of the court to participate in any counseling or treatment program the court may deem appropriate and in the best interest of the child.
- (g) Notwithstanding this section, nothing in subdivision (a)(1) shall be construed to preclude a court from exercising domestic relations jurisdiction pursuant to title 36, regardless of the nature of the allegations, unless and until a pleading is filed or relief is otherwise sought in a juvenile court invoking its exclusive original jurisdiction.
Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1007,s 2, eff. 1/1/2025, app. to all costs submitted for reimbursement on or after July 1, 2011.
Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 996,s 23, eff. 7/1/2024.
Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 973,s 1, eff. 7/1/2024.
Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 167, s 1, eff. 4/18/2019.
Acts 1970, ch. 600, § 3; 1971, ch. 189, §§ 1, 2; 1975, ch. 326, § 2; 1977, ch. 482, § 2; 1979, ch. 96, § 1; 1981, ch. 120, § 2; 1981, ch. 316, § 2; 1981, ch. 348, § 1; 1981, ch. 488, § 11; T.C.A., § 37-203; Acts 1989, ch. 278, § 44; 1994, ch. 811, § 1; 1994, ch. 929, § 3; 1995, ch. 532, § 7; 1996, ch. 675, § 16; 1996, ch. 1079, § 85; 1997 , ch. 465, § 1; 2001, ch. 297, § 1; 2003 , ch. 333, § 1; 2009 , ch. 335, § 1; 2011 , ch. 485, §§ 1, 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 119
cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: Bradley James Cox v. Laura Nicole Lucas, 576 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2019).
Bradley James Cox v. Laura Nicole Lucas, 576 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2019). “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-103 (a)(1) (2014).”
In re D.Y.H., 226 S.W.3d 327 (Tenn. 2007). “The two primary statutes that confer jurisdiction on juvenile courts are Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-103 (2005), which defines areas of exclusive original jurisdiction, and section 37-1-104 (2005), which defines areas of concurrent jurisdiction.”
Smallwood v. Mann, 205 S.W.3d 358 (Tenn. 2006). “Nothing in this subsection (f) shall be construed as vesting the circuit and chancery court with jurisdiction over matters that are in the exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court under § 37-1-103. Id. This provision provides that the juvenile court has concurrent…”
In Re Baby, 447 S.W.3d 807 (Tenn. 2014). “§ 37-1-103 (2014) (providing matters within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the juvenile courts); id.”
Pek v. Jm, 52 S.W.3d 653 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-103. We first address Ms.”
Scales v. Winston, 760 S.W.2d 952 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988). “The statutes that confer jurisdiction on the juvenile courts, namely T.C.A. §§ 37-1-103 and 37-1-104, contain only one provision relating to paternity suits.”
P.E.K. v. J.M., 52 S.W.3d 653 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-103. We first address Ms.”
State v. Rodgers, 235 S.W.3d 92 (Tenn. 2007). “The Court of Appeals also found that no exception to the mootness doctrine was applicable: Counsel for [the Petitioner] asserted at oral argument that, based upon his personal experience, this issue arises frequently in juvenile cases across the state.”
State Dep't of Human Servs. v. Gouvitsa, 735 S.W.2d 452 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987). “T.C.A. § 37-1-103 reads in part as follows: Exclusive original jurisdiction, (a) The juvenile court has exclusive original jurisdiction of the following proceedings, which are governed by this part: (1) Proceedings in which a child is alleged to be delinquent, unruly, or…”
Sawyers v. State, 814 S.W.2d 725 (Tenn. 1991). “T.C.A. § 37-1-103. Thus, it is inaccurate to describe the problem in this case as one of subject matter jurisdiction.”
Paula Jean Holley v. James Franklin Holley, III, 420 S.W.3d 756 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “We hold that the Trial Court had subject matter jurisdiction to hear the Petition because Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-103(a)(1) (2010) is not applicable here.”
Arnold v. Gouvitsa, 735 S.W.2d 458 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987). “T.C.A. § 37-1-103 reads in part as follows: Exclusive original jurisdiction, (a) The juvenile court has exclusive original jurisdiction of the following proceedings, which are governed by this part: (1) Proceedings in which a child is alleged to be delinquent, unruly, or…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-103(a) — 3 cases
Jessica Diane Toms v. James Anthony Toms (Tenn. 2003).
State v. Schmitz (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
In Re Nec, 173 S.W.3d 736 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-103(a)(1) — 15 cases
Paula Jean Holley v. James Franklin Holley, III, 420 S.W.3d 756 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “We hold that the Trial Court had subject matter jurisdiction to hear the Petition because Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-103(a)(1) (2010) is not applicable here.”
In Re Caleb L.C., 362 S.W.3d 581 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
In Re Isaiah L., 340 S.W.3d 692 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
In Re Slm, 207 S.W.3d 288 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Lewis Alvin Minyard v. Laura Nicole Lucas (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-103(a)(1)(C) — 1 case
In Re Markus E. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-103(a)(2) — 6 cases
Smallwood v. Mann, 205 S.W.3d 358 (Tenn. 2006). “Nothing in this subsection (f) shall be construed as vesting the circuit and chancery court with jurisdiction over matters that are in the exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court under § 37-1-103. Id. This provision provides that the juvenile court has concurrent…”
Pek v. Jm, 52 S.W.3d 653 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-103. We first address Ms.”
Linda Smallwood v. Jessica Mann (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
State of Tennessee, ex rel Alexandria Price v. Christopher Childers (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
State of Tennessee, Ex Rel., Margaret v. Hickman v. Ronald L. Dodd (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-103(a)(4) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Marcie Lynn Pursell (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-103(c) — 23 cases
State v. Rodgers, 235 S.W.3d 92 (Tenn. 2007). “The Court of Appeals also found that no exception to the mootness doctrine was applicable: Counsel for [the Petitioner] asserted at oral argument that, based upon his personal experience, this issue arises frequently in juvenile cases across the state.”
In re D.Y.H., 226 S.W.3d 327 (Tenn. 2007). “The two primary statutes that confer jurisdiction on juvenile courts are Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-103 (2005), which defines areas of exclusive original jurisdiction, and section 37-1-104 (2005), which defines areas of concurrent jurisdiction.”
Pek v. Jm, 52 S.W.3d 653 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-103. We first address Ms.”
State v. Barri & Charlie Green, 968 S.W.2d 896 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).
In Re Kendall R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.