Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129 (2026)

Hearings - Judicial Diversion - Findings - Disposition of child

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)
- (1) If a child alleged to be delinquent or unruly enters a plea of guilty or no contest, or after an adjudicatory hearing, the court may defer further proceedings and place the child on judicial diversion and probation subject to reasonable conditions, which may include completion of substance abuse and mental health treatment services where appropriate, without entering a judgment of guilty and with the consent of the child. For delinquent offenses, such reasonable conditions must be consistent with a validated risk and needs assessment. Probation conditions must not include a period of detention or placing the child in custody of the department, but may include a transfer or grant pursuant to § 37-1-131(a)(1). A child must not be placed on judicial diversion if the delinquent act alleged is an offense described in § 37-1-153(b)(1)(B) or (b)(2), if the child has previously been adjudicated delinquent for such an offense, or if the matter is dismissed after a hearing on the merits.
- (2) A judicial diversion agreement shall remain in force for a maximum of six (6) months unless the child is discharged sooner by the court, subject to this subdivision (a)(2). Before expiration of the six-month period, and after notice and a hearing, the court may extend judicial diversion for an additional period not to exceed six (6) months, but only if the court finds and issues a written order that:
  - (A) States that it is in the best interest of the child that a condition or conditions of judicial diversion remain in effect; and
  - (B) Specifies the condition or conditions that shall remain in effect and why that continued effectiveness is in the best interest of the child.
- (3)
  - (A) If the supervising authority finds that the child has violated the terms or conditions of judicial diversion, the supervising authority may file a petition alleging a violation of the terms or conditions of judicial diversion with the court; provided, that the court, in its discretion, may direct the supervising authority that, in some or all circumstances, such a petition should be filed only if the supervising authority makes and documents attempts to address the noncompliant behavior and determines and documents the reasons for which court intervention is needed to address the noncompliance.
  - (B) If a violation of any of the terms of judicial diversion probation is alleged, the child shall be given notice of the violation and an opportunity to be heard concerning the alleged violation. If, after a hearing, the court determines that a violation has occurred, the court may enter an adjudication of guilty and proceed to a dispositional hearing. If no violation is found, the court may continue the period of probation or may dismiss the petition.
- (4) If, during the period of probation, the child does not violate any of the conditions of the probation, then upon expiration of the period, the court shall discharge the child and dismiss the proceedings against the child.

(b)
- (1) If an adjudicatory hearing is held, the court shall make and file its findings as to whether the child is a dependent and neglected child, or, if the petition alleges that the child is delinquent or unruly, whether the acts ascribed to the child were committed by that child. If the court finds that the child is not a dependent or neglected child or that the allegations of delinquency or unruly conduct have not been established, it shall dismiss the petition and order the child discharged from any detention or other restriction theretofore ordered in the proceeding.
- (2)
  - (A) If the petition alleged the child was dependent and neglected as defined in § 37-1-102, or if the court finds the child was dependent and neglected regardless of the grounds alleged in the petition, then the court shall determine whether:
    - (i) The child is a victim of severe child abuse, regardless of whether a perpetrator can be identified; and
    - (ii) Each of the child's parents, guardians, relatives, and caregivers who provided care during the relevant time period of abuse:
      - (a) Knowingly or with gross negligence either committed severe child abuse or failed to protect the child from severe child abuse; or
      - (b) Cannot be excluded as a perpetrator of severe child abuse.
  - (B) The court shall file written findings of fact that are the basis of the court's conclusions on those issues no more than thirty (30) days after the close of the hearing or, if an appeal or a petition for certiorari is filed, within five (5) days after the filing of an appeal or a petition for certiorari, excluding nonjudicial days. If the court finds the child is dependent and neglected, then the court shall hold a dispositional hearing. In scheduling the hearing, the court shall prioritize proceedings in which a child has been removed from the child's home before an order of disposition has been made.
- (3) If the petition alleged the child was delinquent or unruly and the court finds that the child committed the alleged delinquent or unruly acts, the court shall further determine whether the child is in need of treatment or rehabilitation and make and file its findings thereon. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, evidence of the commission of acts that constitute a felony or that reflect recidivistic delinquency is sufficient to sustain a finding that the child is in need of treatment or rehabilitation. If the court finds the child is in need of treatment and rehabilitation, a dispositional hearing shall be held. If the court finds the child is not in need of treatment or rehabilitation, it shall dismiss the petition and discharge the child from any detention or other restriction. If the court continues its determination of whether the child is in need of treatment and rehabilitation or the dispositional hearing, it shall make an appropriate order for detention of the child or the child's release from detention, subject to supervision of the court during the period of the continuance. In scheduling the hearings, the court shall give priority to proceedings in which a child is in detention or has otherwise been removed from the child's home before an order of disposition has been made. The court shall minimize the use of detention between adjudication and disposition. In no event shall a dispositional hearing be postponed or continued because there is a waitlist for a suitable placement unless the child and, if applicable, the child's attorney, agree to the postponement or continuance in writing.

(c)
- (1) Any order of the court that places custody of a child with the department shall empower the department to select any specific residential or treatment placements or programs for the child according to the determination made by the department, its employees, agents or contractors.
- (2) The court may review the residential or treatment placement of a child placed in the department's custody, and within ninety (90) days of the placement, the court may, on its own motion, order a hearing to receive evidence and testimony with regard to the appropriateness of the child's residential or treatment placement. The court shall provide notice of the hearing to the department, to the child's biological parent or parents, and any other person who has been primarily responsible for the care of the child during the twelve (12) months prior to the child's placement in the department's custody. The court shall allow thirty (30) days from the time such notices are sent before the hearing date is set. The court shall issue a placement recommendation based on a preponderance of the evidence to the department within ten (10) days after the conclusion of the hearing. Upon receiving the court's recommendation, the department shall issue a determination as to the child's placement within fifteen (15) days. The department shall notify the court, the child's biological parent or parents, and any other person who has been primarily responsible for the care of the child during the twelve (12) months prior to the child's placement.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 613,s 7, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 436, s 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 312, s 7, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1052, s 21, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1052, s 20, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 263, s 3, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 600, s 4, eff. 7/1/2016.

Acts 1970, ch. 600, § 29; 1977, ch. 482, § 3; T.C.A., § 37-229; Acts 1986, ch. 837, § 2; 1987, ch. 240, § 1; 1989, ch. 277, § 1; 1989, ch. 278, § 42; 1996, ch. 1079, §§ 73, 89; 1997 , ch. 479, § 1; 2004, ch. 859, § 1; 2010 , ch. 820, § 1; 2012 , ch. 1016, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 93 cases (22 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case: In Re Tamera W., 515 S.W.3d 860 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Tamera W., 515 S.W.3d 860 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 9× “First, under Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-129, the juvenile court is required to hold a hearing and to make findings as to *869 whether a child is dependent and neglected.”

In re S.J., 387 S.W.3d 576 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-129 (2010). Severe child abuse in a dependency and neglect proceeding must also be established by clear and convincing evidence.”

Cornelius v. State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs., 314 S.W.3d 902 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “First, under Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-129, the court is to hold a hearing and make findings as to whether a child is dependent and neglected.”

In Re Caleb L.C., 362 S.W.3d 581 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 3× “First, under Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-129, the court is to determine whether a child is dependent and neglected, which is sometimes referred to as the adjudicatory phase.”

State v. Rodgers, 235 S.W.3d 92 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 2× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-129 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: If the court finds on proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the child committed the acts by reason of which the child is alleged to be delinquent, it shall proceed immediately or at a postponed…”

In Re Askew, 993 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. 1999). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-129 (1996). In fact, an explicit and implicit reading of the order conveys every indication that the juvenile court intended to return Bianca to the custody of her natural parents in the near future.”

In Re: Samuel D., 536 S.W.3d 447 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129 (2014). Our review, however, is de novo upon the record, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact of the trial court, unless the preponderance of the eyidence is otherwise.”

State v. David H., 247 S.W.3d 651 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “[2] Pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-129(c), a court hearing a petition alleging dependency and neglect is required to determine whether the parent(s) committed severe child abuse, as defined by statute.”

In Re Hannah S., 324 S.W.3d 520 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “§ 37-1-129 (2005) requires an initial hearing on the dependency and neglect petition and, if a child is found to be dependent and neglected, the court must proceed with a disposition of the case. According to the statute: (a)(1) After hearing the evidence on the petition, the…”

In Re Isaiah L., 340 S.W.3d 692 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “son or agency has not initiated judicial proceedings seeking either legal custody or adoption of the child; or (I) Who is or has been allowed, encouraged or permitted to engage in prostitution or obscene or pornographic photographing, filming, posing, or similar activity and…”

In Re Neveah W., 470 S.W.3d 807 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129 . DCS argues that the plain language in Section 37-l-129(e) empowers DCS, and not the court, to make specific placement decisions for a child within DCS custody.”

In the matter of: Bianca Arneshe Askew, Dorothy Lewis v. Julie Donoho, 993 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. 1999). · cites it 3× “§ 37-1-129 (1996). In fact, an explicit and implicit reading of the order conveys every indication that the juvenile court intended to return Bianca to the custody of her natural parents in the near future.”

Show all 93 citing cases →

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(a) — 1 case

In Re Serenity S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(a)(1) — 1 case

In the Matter of: E.B., T.B., T.B., & R.B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(a)(2) — 7 cases

In re S.J., 387 S.W.3d 576 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-129 (2010). Severe child abuse in a dependency and neglect proceeding must also be established by clear and convincing evidence.”

In Re Hlf, 297 S.W.3d 223 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).

In Re Hailey S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).

In Re Jordyn H. (2021).

In Re Just. W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(b) — 4 cases

In the Matter of Wayne H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

In Re Skylar K. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).

Eric Petty, a child (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

State v. Steven Arrington (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(b)(1) — 1 case

In Re Skylar K. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(b)(2) — 7 cases

In Re Tamera W., 515 S.W.3d 860 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “First, under Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-129, the juvenile court is required to hold a hearing and to make findings as to *869 whether a child is dependent and neglected.”

In Re Lucas L. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).

In Re Dilmer S.M. - Concurring (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re: Yvonne R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).

In Re Azay C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(c) — 7 cases

Cornelius v. State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs., 314 S.W.3d 902 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “First, under Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-129, the court is to hold a hearing and make findings as to whether a child is dependent and neglected.”

State v. David H., 247 S.W.3d 651 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “[2] Pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 37-1-129(c), a court hearing a petition alleging dependency and neglect is required to determine whether the parent(s) committed severe child abuse, as defined by statute.”

In Re Isaiah L., 340 S.W.3d 692 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “son or agency has not initiated judicial proceedings seeking either legal custody or adoption of the child; or (I) Who is or has been allowed, encouraged or permitted to engage in prostitution or obscene or pornographic photographing, filming, posing, or similar activity and…”

Rebecca Cornelius v. State of Tennessee, Dep't Of Child.'s Servs. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).

In Re: Yvonne R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(d) — 1 case

In Re Mjb, 140 S.W.3d 643 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(e) — 5 cases

State of Tennessee, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Christina Marie Keelyn & Edward Malachowski (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).

In re Addison M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).

State v. E.G.P. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).

Walter Fletcher v. Deanna M. Fletcher (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).

In Re Dontavis K.W. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-129(f) — 1 case

In Re: Yvonne R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.