Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (2026)

Domestic assault

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 987,s 2, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 440, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1046, s 2, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 596, s 1, eff. 3/23/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 127, s 2, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 906, s 4, eff. 1/1/2017.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 693, Secs.s 2, s 3, s 4 eff. 7/1/2014.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 693, s 1, eff. 7/1/2014.

Acts 2000, ch. 824, § 1; 2002, ch. 649, § 3; 2008 , ch. 744, § 1; 2009 , ch. 455, § 4; 2010 , ch. 1061, §§ 1, 2; 2012 , ch. 931, § 1; 2012 , ch. 987, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 74 cases (21 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: United States v. Castleman, 134 S. Ct. 1405 (2014).
United States v. Castleman, 134 S. Ct. 1405 (2014). · cites it 3× “" B In 2001, Castleman was charged in a Tennessee court with having "intentionally or knowingly cause[d] bodily injury to" the mother of his child, in violation of Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-111(b) (Supp.2002).”
State of Tennessee v. Michael Smith, 492 S.W.3d 224 (Tenn. 2016). · cites it 2× “§ 39-13-111(a). 6 . We note that the Defendant, in fact, did /object to the admissibility of testimony regarding' the incident in Mississippi, .”
State v. Sanders, 766 S.E.2d 331 (N.C. 2014). · cites it 6× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (b) (2009). Section 39-13-101 of the Tennessee Code Annotated, in turn, establishes that someone commits an “assault” when he or she: “(1) Intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; (2) Intentionally or knowingly causes…”
State of Tennessee v. Terrance Antonio Cecil, 409 S.W.3d 599 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-13-111 (domestic assault), -302 (false imprisonment) (2010).”
United States v. Melgar-Cabrera, 892 F.3d 1053 (10th Cir. 2018). “, his predicate crime for a conviction under § 922(g) ) was a conviction in 2001 for " 'intentionally or knowingly caus[ing] bodily injury to' the mother of his child, in violation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (b) (Supp. 2002).”
State v. Sanders, 753 S.E.2d 713 (N.C. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 31× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (a). An examination of the elements reveals that the North Carolina offense of assault on a female and the Tennessee offense of domestic assault are not substantially similar, especially given that “the rule of lenity requires us to interpret [N.”
United States v. Scott, 990 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2021). “24We need not here decide if the crimes at issue in Castleman, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (b) (proscribing assault—defined in relevant part as “[i]ntentionally[ or] knowingly .”
United States v. James Castleman, 695 F.3d 582 (6th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (b). Under § 39-13-101, a person is guilty of assault if he: (1) Intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; (2) Intentionally or knowingly causes another to reasonably fear imminent bodily injury; or (3) Intentionally or…”
United States v. Keith Studhorse, II, 883 F.3d 1198 (9th Cir. 2018). “(alterations omitted) (quoting Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (b)). The Court rejected this contention.”
Hopkins v. Bradley Cnty., 338 S.W.3d 529 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “A Judge issued an arrest warrant for Jeremy Hopkins on December 21, 2006 upon a finding that there was probable cause that Hopkins committed the crime of Domestic Assault in violation of Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-111. 2. At the time of issuing of the arrest warrant the Judge set…”
United States v. Castro-Vazquez, 176 F. Supp. 3d 13 (D.P.R. 2016). “at 1413 (quoting Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 [b]). Although the “assault” element appeared indivisible on its face, the Court and the parties all agreed that the statute was divisible because it “incorporated by reference” another statute that “defined three types of assault.”
Jose Yanel Sanchez-Perez v. Merrick B. Garland, 100 F.4th 693 (6th Cir. 2024). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (b). Accordingly, we must look to the cross-referenced general assault statute to determine the elements of the relevant crime.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111(a) — 8 cases
State of Tennessee v. Michael Smith, 492 S.W.3d 224 (Tenn. 2016). “§ 39-13-111(a). 6 . We note that the Defendant, in fact, did /object to the admissibility of testimony regarding' the incident in Mississippi, .”
State v. Sanders, 753 S.E.2d 713 (N.C. Ct. App. 2014). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (a). An examination of the elements reveals that the North Carolina offense of assault on a female and the Tennessee offense of domestic assault are not substantially similar, especially given that “the rule of lenity requires us to interpret [N.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111(a)(1) — 5 cases
State of Tennessee v. Walter H. Webb (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015).
State of Tennessee v. Arvel Joshua Terry (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111(a)(2) — 3 cases
State v. Sanders, 753 S.E.2d 713 (N.C. Ct. App. 2014). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (a). An examination of the elements reveals that the North Carolina offense of assault on a female and the Tennessee offense of domestic assault are not substantially similar, especially given that “the rule of lenity requires us to interpret [N.”
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Jordan (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111(a)(3) — 2 cases
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111(a)(4) — 1 case
Anderson (M.D. Tenn. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111(b) — 14 cases
United States v. Castleman, 134 S. Ct. 1405 (2014). “" B In 2001, Castleman was charged in a Tennessee court with having "intentionally or knowingly cause[d] bodily injury to" the mother of his child, in violation of Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-111(b) (Supp.2002).”
State of Tennessee v. Michael Smith, 492 S.W.3d 224 (Tenn. 2016). “§ 39-13-111(a). 6 . We note that the Defendant, in fact, did /object to the admissibility of testimony regarding' the incident in Mississippi, .”
State v. Sanders, 753 S.E.2d 713 (N.C. Ct. App. 2014). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111 (a). An examination of the elements reveals that the North Carolina offense of assault on a female and the Tennessee offense of domestic assault are not substantially similar, especially given that “the rule of lenity requires us to interpret [N.”
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Jordan (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-111(c)(5) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Antwon Thomas (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.