Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (2026)

Consent of pregnant woman required prior to abortion - Information provided by doctor - Waiting period - Penalty for violation - Requirements inapplicable in certain cases

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 862,s 3, eff. 1/1/2019.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 473,s 1, eff. 7/1/2015.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1995, ch. 458, § 4; 2010, ch. 790, § 2; 2012, ch. 1008, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1990–2021 · leading case: State v. Dorantes, 331 S.W.3d 370 (Tenn. 2011).
State v. Dorantes, 331 S.W.3d 370 (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 2× “While affirming convictions for felony murder and aggravated child abuse, the Court of Criminal Appeals interpreted Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-15-202(a) (Supp.1995) and addressed “child abuse as defined in § 39-15-401” when serious bodily injury results, as described in…”
Hodgson v. Minnesota, 497 U.S. 417 (1990). · cites it 4× “1989); Idaho Code § 18-610 (6) (1987); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (f) (Supp. 1989); Utah Code Ann.”
Bristol Reg'l Women's Ctr. v. Herbert Slatery, III, 7 F.4th 478 (6th Cir. 2021). · cites it 8× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (a)–(h) (2019).”
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Nashville, Inc. v. McWherter, 817 S.W.2d 13 (Tenn. 1991). · cites it 17× “We conclude that the more recent statute has had the effect of repealing the prior statute by implication and, further, that unless and until T.C.A. § 39-15-202(f) is successfully challenged in court on constitutional grounds, it represents the current state of the law in…”
Bristol Reg'l Women's Ctr. v. Herbert Slatery, III, 988 F.3d 329 (6th Cir. 2021). · cites it 7× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (b). 3 Our dissenting colleague calls for “immediate correction” of this order.”
Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Donald Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee, & John Knox Walkup, Attorney Gen., 175 F.3d 456 (6th Cir. 1999). · cites it 5× “) Likewise, in concluding that the “combined effects of the physician-only counseling requirement in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (b) and the waiting period in Tenn.”
Roddy v. Volunteer Med. Clinic, Inc., 926 S.W.2d 572 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 6× “, the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, and Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-15-202, et seq., the criminal statutory scheme applicable to abortion services.”
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 107× “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 266× “Compare Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (f) (Supp. 1989) with Tenn.”
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van Hollen, 738 F.3d 786 (7th Cir. 2013). “1-04(1); Tenn. Code § 39-15-202(h); Tex. Health & Safety Code § 171.”
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland & Jill Meadows v. Kimberly K. Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa & Iowa Bd. of Med., 915 N.W.2d 206 (Iowa 2018). “) (seventy-two hours); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (d)(1) (West, Westlaw current through 2018 2d Reg.”
Adams & Boyle, P.C. v. Herbert Slatery III, 956 F.3d 913 (6th Cir. 2020). “, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-15-202 (a)–(h). Moreover, if a Tennessee woman wishes (or needs) to have a procedural abortion in-state, there are just a handful of providers in a handful of cities where she may do so.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(a) — 2 cases
State v. Dorantes, 331 S.W.3d 370 (Tenn. 2011). “While affirming convictions for felony murder and aggravated child abuse, the Court of Criminal Appeals interpreted Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-15-202(a) (Supp.1995) and addressed “child abuse as defined in § 39-15-401” when serious bodily injury results, as described in…”
Roddy v. Volunteer Med. Clinic, Inc., 926 S.W.2d 572 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “, the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, and Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-15-202, et seq., the criminal statutory scheme applicable to abortion services.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b) — 4 cases
Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Donald Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee, & John Knox Walkup, Attorney Gen., 175 F.3d 456 (6th Cir. 1999). “) Likewise, in concluding that the “combined effects of the physician-only counseling requirement in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (b) and the waiting period in Tenn.”
Roddy v. Volunteer Med. Clinic, Inc., 926 S.W.2d 572 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “, the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, and Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-15-202, et seq., the criminal statutory scheme applicable to abortion services.”
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Compare Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (f) (Supp. 1989) with Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b)(1) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b)(1)(3) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b)(3) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Compare Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (f) (Supp. 1989) with Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b)(4) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b)(5) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Compare Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (f) (Supp. 1989) with Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b)(6) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Compare Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (f) (Supp. 1989) with Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b)(c) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b)(l) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(b)(l)(3) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(d) — 3 cases
Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Donald Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee, & John Knox Walkup, Attorney Gen., 175 F.3d 456 (6th Cir. 1999). “) Likewise, in concluding that the “combined effects of the physician-only counseling requirement in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (b) and the waiting period in Tenn.”
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Compare Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (f) (Supp. 1989) with Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(d)(1) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(d)(3) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(d)(l) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(f) — 4 cases
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Nashville, Inc. v. McWherter, 817 S.W.2d 13 (Tenn. 1991). “We conclude that the more recent statute has had the effect of repealing the prior statute by implication and, further, that unless and until T.C.A. § 39-15-202(f) is successfully challenged in court on constitutional grounds, it represents the current state of the law in…”
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
McGlothlin v. Bristol (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(f)(l) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Nashville, Inc. v. McWherter, 817 S.W.2d 13 (Tenn. 1991). “We conclude that the more recent statute has had the effect of repealing the prior statute by implication and, further, that unless and until T.C.A. § 39-15-202(f) is successfully challenged in court on constitutional grounds, it represents the current state of the law in…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(g) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “§ 39-15-202 We now turn to consider the statutory provisions that set out the informed consent requirements, the two-day waiting period requirement, and the medical emergency exceptions to each of these requirements. Because each of these provisions are interrelated, and the…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202(h) — 2 cases
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van Hollen, 738 F.3d 786 (7th Cir. 2013). “1-04(1); Tenn. Code § 39-15-202(h); Tex. Health & Safety Code § 171.”
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Compare Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-202 (f) (Supp. 1989) with Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.