Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (2024)

Simple possession or casual exchange

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1135, s 2, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 409, Secs.s 4, s 5 eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 409, s 3, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 876, s 12, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 970,s 2, eff. 7/1/2014.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1990, ch. 992, § 3; 1993, ch. 456, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 226 cases (32 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: STATE of Tennessee v. Marcus RICHARDS, 286 S.W.3d 873 (Tenn. 2009).
STATE of Tennessee v. Marcus RICHARDS, 286 S.W.3d 873 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 8× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (a) (2006). Possession requires some showing that the defendant was in a position to exercise control over the controlled substance.”
State v. Majors, 318 S.W.3d 850 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (2006). As we have explained, the evidence tampering statute only requires tampering with a "record, document, or thing," and the word "thing” encompasses any object or entity, even one that is not capable of a precise designation.”
State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (a) requires a mens rea of “knowingly.”
State v. Patterson, 966 S.W.2d 435 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “The legislative *443 intent of this statutory definition was not to legalize the production of a controlled substance for one’s personal use; however, the production of a controlled substance for one’s personal use would constitute the misdemeanor offense of simple possession…”
Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, 291 S.W.3d 873 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-417(j)(5). Tenn.Code Ann.”
State v. Cox, 171 S.W.3d 174 (Tenn. 2005). · cites it 2× “The defendant and Scott were each indicted for simple possession of marijuana, Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-418, possession of more than .”
State v. McElrath, 569 S.W.3d 565 (Tenn. 2019). · cites it 6× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (e) (2014) ("A violation under this section is a Class E felony where the person has two (2) or more prior convictions under this section.”
State v. Ingram, 331 S.W.3d 746 (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-17-418(c), -425(c)(2) (2006).”
State v. Carter, 121 S.W.3d 579 (Tenn. 2003). · cites it 2× “"Simple possession” is defined in Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-418(a) (1997) as the knowing possession or casual exchange of a controlled substance.”
State of Tennessee v. Gary Lee Marise, 197 S.W.3d 762 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-433(a)(1) (2003). 2 .”
State v. Boyd, 925 S.W.2d 237 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “…and the sentences imposed therefor are affirmed. WADE and PEAY, JJ., concur. 1 . Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-513. 2 . Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-418.”
United States v. Jimmy Abernathy, 843 F.3d 243 (6th Cir. 2016). “BL2016-378 (Sept. 6, 2016); Memphis Substitute Ordinance No.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(a): 64 cases
State v. Patterson, 966 S.W.2d 435 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “The legislative *443 intent of this statutory definition was not to legalize the production of a controlled substance for one’s personal use; however, the production of a controlled substance for one’s personal use would constitute the misdemeanor offense of simple possession…”
STATE of Tennessee v. Marcus RICHARDS, 286 S.W.3d 873 (Tenn. 2009). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (a) (2006). Possession requires some showing that the defendant was in a position to exercise control over the controlled substance.”
State v. Carter, 121 S.W.3d 579 (Tenn. 2003). “"Simple possession” is defined in Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-418(a) (1997) as the knowing possession or casual exchange of a controlled substance.”
State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (a) requires a mens rea of “knowingly.”
State of Tennessee v. Gary Lee Marise, 197 S.W.3d 762 (Tenn. 2006). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-433(a)(1) (2003). 2 .”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(a)(1): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Derrick D. Crutcher, No. M2010-00871-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 15, 2011).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(b): 4 cases
State v. Danny Spradlin, 12 S.W.3d 432 (Tenn. 2000).
State of Tennessee v. Charles William Reed, No. M2015-00978-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. July 1, 2016).
State of Tennessee v. Jamie Paul Click, No. E2015-01769-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 30, 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Thorne Peters, No. W2011-00680-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. May 9, 2012).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(c): 7 cases
State v. Ingram, 331 S.W.3d 746 (Tenn. 2011). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-17-418(c), -425(c)(2) (2006).”
State of Tennessee v. Stephen Bartholomew Gillard, No. M2012-00910-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 27, 2013).
State of Tennessee v. Barry D. Harris, Jr., No. M2010-01466-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Nov. 28, 2011).
State of Tennessee v. Brandon D. Thomas, No. M2009-00464-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Nov. 29, 2010).
State of Tennessee v. Aaron Tate, No. W2012-00462-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 18, 2013).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(c)(1): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Nathaniel Shawn Declue, No. M2019-01424-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 2, 2021).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(d): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Chris Edward Smith, No. E2004-02272-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Aug. 3, 2005).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(e): 13 cases
State of Tennessee v. Thomas R. Davis, No. E2016-01622-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Apr. 24, 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Elvis Hester, No. W2016-01822-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Nov. 21, 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Calvin Demetrius Shaw, No. M2009-01568-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 14, 2011).
State of Tennessee v. Benjamin Gunn, No. W2016-00338-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Oct. 26, 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Stephen Bartholomew Gillard, No. M2012-00910-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Mar. 27, 2013).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.