Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (2026)

Simple possession or casual exchange

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1135, s 2, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 409, Secs.s 4, s 5 eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 409, s 3, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 876, s 12, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 970,s 2, eff. 7/1/2014.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1990, ch. 992, § 3; 1993, ch. 456, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 226 cases (32 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: STATE of Tennessee v. Marcus RICHARDS, 286 S.W.3d 873 (Tenn. 2009).
STATE of Tennessee v. Marcus RICHARDS, 286 S.W.3d 873 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 8× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (a) (2006). Possession requires some showing that the defendant was in a position to exercise control over the controlled substance.”
State v. Majors, 318 S.W.3d 850 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (2006). As we have explained, the evidence tampering statute only requires tampering with a "record, document, or thing," and the word "thing” encompasses any object or entity, even one that is not capable of a precise designation.”
State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (a) requires a mens rea of “knowingly.”
State v. Patterson, 966 S.W.2d 435 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “The legislative *443 intent of this statutory definition was not to legalize the production of a controlled substance for one’s personal use; however, the production of a controlled substance for one’s personal use would constitute the misdemeanor offense of simple possession…”
Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Comm'r of Revenue for the State of Tennessee, 291 S.W.3d 873 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-417(j)(5). Tenn.Code Ann.”
State v. Cox, 171 S.W.3d 174 (Tenn. 2005). · cites it 2× “The defendant and Scott were each indicted for simple possession of marijuana, Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-418, possession of more than .”
State v. McElrath, 569 S.W.3d 565 (Tenn. 2019). · cites it 6× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (e) (2014) ("A violation under this section is a Class E felony where the person has two (2) or more prior convictions under this section.”
State v. Ingram, 331 S.W.3d 746 (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-17-418(c), -425(c)(2) (2006).”
State v. Carter, 121 S.W.3d 579 (Tenn. 2003). · cites it 2× “"Simple possession” is defined in Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-418(a) (1997) as the knowing possession or casual exchange of a controlled substance.”
State of Tennessee v. Gary Lee Marise, 197 S.W.3d 762 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-433(a)(1) (2003). 2 .”
State v. Boyd, 925 S.W.2d 237 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “…and the sentences imposed therefor are affirmed. WADE and PEAY, JJ., concur. 1 . Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-513. 2 . Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-418.”
United States v. Jimmy Abernathy, 843 F.3d 243 (6th Cir. 2016). “BL2016-378 (Sept. 6, 2016); Memphis Substitute Ordinance No.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(a) — 64 cases
State v. Patterson, 966 S.W.2d 435 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “The legislative *443 intent of this statutory definition was not to legalize the production of a controlled substance for one’s personal use; however, the production of a controlled substance for one’s personal use would constitute the misdemeanor offense of simple possession…”
STATE of Tennessee v. Marcus RICHARDS, 286 S.W.3d 873 (Tenn. 2009). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (a) (2006). Possession requires some showing that the defendant was in a position to exercise control over the controlled substance.”
State v. Carter, 121 S.W.3d 579 (Tenn. 2003). “"Simple possession” is defined in Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-418(a) (1997) as the knowing possession or casual exchange of a controlled substance.”
State v. Thornton, 10 S.W.3d 229 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (a) requires a mens rea of “knowingly.”
State of Tennessee v. Gary Lee Marise, 197 S.W.3d 762 (Tenn. 2006). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-433(a)(1) (2003). 2 .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(a)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(b) — 4 cases
State v. Danny Spradlin, 12 S.W.3d 432 (Tenn. 2000).
State of Tennessee v. Jamie Paul Click (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Thorne Peters (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(c) — 7 cases
State v. Ingram, 331 S.W.3d 746 (Tenn. 2011). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-17-418(c), -425(c)(2) (2006).”
State of Tennessee v. Brandon D. Thomas (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).
State of Tennessee v. Aaron Tate (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(c)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(d) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Chris Edward Smith (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418(e) — 13 cases
State of Tennessee v. Thomas R. Davis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Elvis Hester (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Benjamin Gunn (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.