Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (2026)

Drug-Free School Zone - Enhanced criminal penalties for violations within zone

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 927, s 1, eff. 4/29/2022.

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 803, Secs.s 2, s 3, s 4, s 5, s 6, s 7, s 8, s 9 eff. 9/1/2020.

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 803, s 1, eff. 9/1/2020.

Acts 1995, ch. 515, § 1; 1998, ch. 1049, § 16; 2005, ch. 295, §§ 1 - 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 187 cases (42 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: State v. Vasques, 221 S.W.3d 514 (Tenn. 2007).
State v. Vasques, 221 S.W.3d 514 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 24× “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432(a) (2003); see also State v.”
Terrance Lavar Davis v. State of Tennessee, 313 S.W.3d 751 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 21× “Because he possessed and delivered cocaine in a school zone, Defendant’s plea- bargained sentence was imposed pursuant to the Drug-Free School Zone Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (2003) (“the Act”).”
State v. Dycus, 456 S.W.3d 918 (Tenn. 2014). · cites it 16× “In reaching this conclusion, the appellate court reasoned: The plain language of the diversion statute makes it clear that a person granted judicial diversion is not convicted of an offense because a judgment of guilt is never entered.”
State v. Smith, 48 S.W.3d 159 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). · cites it 16× “In accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (1997), the “Drug-Free School Zone Act,” and in accordance with the appellant’s career offender status, the trial court imposed an effective sentence of sixty years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction.”
State of Tennessee v. Stanley Bernard Gibson, 506 S.W.3d 450 (Tenn. 2016). · cites it 8× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (a). The legislature determined that the “enhanced and mandatory minimum sentences” required by the Act are necessary “to serve as a deterrent to such unacceptable conduct.”
State v. Fields, 40 S.W.3d 435 (Tenn. 2001). · cites it 5× “In support of its argument, the State looks to the intent of the General Assembly to establish drug-free school zones as evidence of the seriousness of the offense; moreover, the State cites to the explicit language in the Drug-Free School Zone Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432…”
State v. Lindsey, 208 S.W.3d 432 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “§ 39-17-417 and T.C.A. § 39-17-432, a Class A felony.” Count 32 of the indictment stated in pertinent part that Defendant on or about October 31, 2001, “did unlawfully, felo-niously and knowingly sell and, or deliver point five (.”
State v. Jenkins, 15 S.W.3d 914 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “As part of his plea agreement, the defendant reserved appeal on a certified question of law: Whether Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 is unconstitutional as it: (a) is vague, overbroad and does not put a person of reasonable intelligence on notice as to how to measure the distance…”
Calvin Eugene BRYANT v. STATE of Tennessee, 460 S.W.3d 513 (Tenn. 2015). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (b)(2)(D). However, simple possession and casual exchange are Class A misdemeanors, Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. 2022). · cites it 90× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (c) (2014) (amended 2020 & 2022).”
Commonwealth v. Campbell, 758 A.2d 1231 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2000). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432(a) (1999). In contrast, 18 Pa.”
State of Tennessee v. Herbert Eugene Ewing (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). · cites it 61× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (a) (Supp. 1995).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(3)(c)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(a) — 16 cases
State v. Vasques, 221 S.W.3d 514 (Tenn. 2007). “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432(a) (2003); see also State v.”
State v. Dycus, 456 S.W.3d 918 (Tenn. 2014). “In reaching this conclusion, the appellate court reasoned: The plain language of the diversion statute makes it clear that a person granted judicial diversion is not convicted of an offense because a judgment of guilt is never entered.”
State v. Lindsey, 208 S.W.3d 432 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006). “§ 39-17-417 and T.C.A. § 39-17-432, a Class A felony.” Count 32 of the indictment stated in pertinent part that Defendant on or about October 31, 2001, “did unlawfully, felo-niously and knowingly sell and, or deliver point five (.”
State v. Smith, 48 S.W.3d 159 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “In accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (1997), the “Drug-Free School Zone Act,” and in accordance with the appellant’s career offender status, the trial court imposed an effective sentence of sixty years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction.”
Commonwealth v. Campbell, 758 A.2d 1231 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2000). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432(a) (1999). In contrast, 18 Pa.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(b) — 40 cases
State v. Vasques, 221 S.W.3d 514 (Tenn. 2007). “" Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432(a) (2003); see also State v.”
Terrance Lavar Davis v. State of Tennessee, 313 S.W.3d 751 (Tenn. 2010). “Because he possessed and delivered cocaine in a school zone, Defendant’s plea- bargained sentence was imposed pursuant to the Drug-Free School Zone Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (2003) (“the Act”).”
State v. Fields, 40 S.W.3d 435 (Tenn. 2001). “In support of its argument, the State looks to the intent of the General Assembly to establish drug-free school zones as evidence of the seriousness of the offense; moreover, the State cites to the explicit language in the Drug-Free School Zone Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432…”
State v. Dycus, 456 S.W.3d 918 (Tenn. 2014). “In reaching this conclusion, the appellate court reasoned: The plain language of the diversion statute makes it clear that a person granted judicial diversion is not convicted of an offense because a judgment of guilt is never entered.”
State of Tennessee v. Stanley Bernard Gibson, 506 S.W.3d 450 (Tenn. 2016). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (a). The legislature determined that the “enhanced and mandatory minimum sentences” required by the Act are necessary “to serve as a deterrent to such unacceptable conduct.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(b)(1) — 53 cases
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. 2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (c) (2014) (amended 2020 & 2022).”
State of Tennessee v. Corey Young (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(b)(1)(2) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Raymond B. Thomas (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(b)(1)(B) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Edwin Reeves (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(b)(2) — 3 cases
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. 2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (c) (2014) (amended 2020 & 2022).”
State of Tennessee v. Dale Merritt (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(b)(2)(A) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Lavondas C. Nelson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(b)(3) — 14 cases
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. 2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (c) (2014) (amended 2020 & 2022).”
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Turner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Tyler Alexis Dixon (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
State of Tennessee v. Garrick Graham (Tenn. Crim. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(b)(l) — 1 case
Terrance Lavar Davis v. State of Tennessee, 313 S.W.3d 751 (Tenn. 2010). “Because he possessed and delivered cocaine in a school zone, Defendant’s plea- bargained sentence was imposed pursuant to the Drug-Free School Zone Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (2003) (“the Act”).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(c) — 44 cases
State v. Dycus, 456 S.W.3d 918 (Tenn. 2014). “In reaching this conclusion, the appellate court reasoned: The plain language of the diversion statute makes it clear that a person granted judicial diversion is not convicted of an offense because a judgment of guilt is never entered.”
Terrance Lavar Davis v. State of Tennessee, 313 S.W.3d 751 (Tenn. 2010). “Because he possessed and delivered cocaine in a school zone, Defendant’s plea- bargained sentence was imposed pursuant to the Drug-Free School Zone Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (2003) (“the Act”).”
State v. Smith, 48 S.W.3d 159 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “In accordance with Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (1997), the “Drug-Free School Zone Act,” and in accordance with the appellant’s career offender status, the trial court imposed an effective sentence of sixty years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction.”
Thomas Smith v. John Howerton, 509 F. App'x 476 (6th Cir. 2012).
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. 2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (c) (2014) (amended 2020 & 2022).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(c)(1) — 5 cases
State of Tennessee v. Lavondas C. Nelson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024).
State of Tennessee v. Brian Lee Fisk (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(d) — 4 cases
Terry Lynn Raney v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. 2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (c) (2014) (amended 2020 & 2022).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(e) — 3 cases
Terrance Lavar Davis v. State of Tennessee, 313 S.W.3d 751 (Tenn. 2010). “Because he possessed and delivered cocaine in a school zone, Defendant’s plea- bargained sentence was imposed pursuant to the Drug-Free School Zone Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (2003) (“the Act”).”
State v. James David Lamor Perry (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).
Unknown, 371 F. App'x 575.
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(f) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Timothy Prink (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. 2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (c) (2014) (amended 2020 & 2022).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(g) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Shawn Dontay Beard (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(h) — 11 cases
State of Tennessee v. Jamie Paul Click (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
State of Tennessee v. Herbert Eugene Ewing (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (a) (Supp. 1995).”
State of Tennessee v. Edwin Reeves (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
State of Tennessee v. Jamie Paul Click (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(h)(1) — 6 cases
State of Tennessee v. Eric Tyre Patton (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024).
State of Tennessee v. Jamie Paul Click (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
State of Tennessee v. Jamie Paul Click (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432(h)(3) — 3 cases
State of Tennessee v. Eric Tyre Patton (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024).
State of Tennessee v. Herbert Eugene Ewing (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-432 (a) (Supp. 1995).”
State of Tennessee v. Jamie Paul Click (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.