Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-438 (2026)

Production, manufacture, distribution or possession of salvia divinorum A

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 401,s 1, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 401,Secs.s2, s3 eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 302,s 6, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 735,s 1, eff. 7/1/2014.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 161,s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.

Acts 2006, ch. 700, § 1; 2010, ch. 922, § 1; 2011, ch. 274, § 1; 2012, ch. 848, § 21; 2012, ch. 854, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2018 · leading case: State of Tennessee v. Franklin Dee Rose (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).
State of Tennessee v. Franklin Dee Rose (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “See T.C.A. § 39-17-438(a)(1)(K); see also 21 C.”
State of Tennessee v. Paresh J. Patel (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “The purpose of the undercover agent was to purchase products that were banned by statute [T.C.A. § 39-17-438] known as synthetic drugs to most of us in the community.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-438(a)(1)(K) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Franklin Dee Rose (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). “See T.C.A. § 39-17-438(a)(1)(K); see also 21 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.