Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103 (2026)

Liability for violations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 2001, ch. 367, §3; 2003 , ch. 418, § 4; 2012, ch. 1061, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2010–2024 · leading case: Knox Cnty. Ex Rel. Env't Termite & Pest Control, Inc. v. Arrow Exterminators, Inc., 350 S.W.3d 511 (Tenn. 2011).
Knox Cnty. Ex Rel. Env't Termite & Pest Control, Inc. v. Arrow Exterminators, Inc., 350 S.W.3d 511 (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 4× “§ 4-18-103(a), Tennessee's False Claims Act applies to any person who (1) Knowingly presents or causes to be presented to an officer or employee of the state or of any political subdivision thereof, a false claim for payment or approval; (2) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to…”
Hamilton Cnty. Emergency Commc'ns Dist. v. BellSouth Telecomm. LLC, 852 F.3d 521 (6th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “, political subdivisions of the State), in violation of T.C.A. § 4-18-103(a)(7). The district court construed this as a “false certification theory” claim, which — it stressed as “[ijmportantly" — “only applies where the underlying regulation is a ‘condition of payment,’ ”…”
United States ex rel. Bergman v. Abbot Labs., 995 F. Supp. 2d 357 (E.D. Pa. 2014). · cites it 2× “One court has observed that “seeking recovery under the Tennessee False Claims Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-18-103, is clearly redundant of-the claims for relief asserted under the TM FCA, TenmCode Ann.”
United States v. Chattanooga-Hamilton Cnty. Hosp. Auth., 958 F. Supp. 2d 846 (E.D. Tenn. 2013). · cites it 3× “§ 71-5-182, and Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103 ; and (3) making or using a false record or statement to cause a claim to be paid in violation of 31 U.”
Hamilton Cnty. Emergency Commc'ns Dist. v. BellSouth Telecomm., LLC, 154 F. Supp. 3d 666 (E.D. Tenn. 2016). “§ 4-18-103(a)(7). 25 This cause 'of action is often *696 referred to as a “reverse false claim.”
Hamilton Cnty. Emergency Commc'ns Dist. v. Bellsouth Telecomm., LLC, 890 F. Supp. 2d 862 (E.D. Tenn. 2012). “§ 4-18-103(a)(7). Cf. U.S. ex rel. A+ Homecare, Inc.”
Pamela Cotham v. Nicholas Jay Yeager (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 11× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103 (a)(1)-(3). Furthermore, the amended complaint contains no allegation that any of the defendants committed the violations listed in subsections (4) through (6).”
Roane Cty. Emer. Commc'ns v. BellSouth (6th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “, political subdivisions of the State), in violation of T.C.A. §4-18-103(a)(7). The district court construed this as a “false certification theory” claim, which—it stressed as “[i]mportantly”—“only applies where the underlying regulation is a ‘condition of payment,’” Hamilton…”
Dr. William P. Harman v. The Univ. of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 3× “7 Tennessee Code Annotated § 4-18-103 provides in pertinent part: (a) Any person who commits any of the following acts shall be liable to the state or to the political subdivision for three (3) times the amount of damages that the state or the political subdivision sustains…”
United States of Am. v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (E.D. Pa. 2021). “§ 71-5-182 (a)(l)(A)- (B) and Tennessee False Claims Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103 (a)(1)-(2) (Counts 22 & 23); Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, Va.”
United States of Am. v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (E.D. Pa. 2021). “§ 71-5-182 (a)(l)(A)- (B) and Tennessee False Claims Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103 (a)(1)-(2) (Counts 22 & 23); Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, Va.”
Robert E. Lee Flade v. City of Shelbyville, Tennessee (2024). “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 4-18-103 (a)(1), -104(c)(1).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103(a) — 2 cases
Knox Cnty. Ex Rel. Env't Termite & Pest Control, Inc. v. Arrow Exterminators, Inc., 350 S.W.3d 511 (Tenn. 2011). “§ 4-18-103(a), Tennessee's False Claims Act applies to any person who (1) Knowingly presents or causes to be presented to an officer or employee of the state or of any political subdivision thereof, a false claim for payment or approval; (2) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to…”
Dr. William P. Harman v. The Univ. of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “7 Tennessee Code Annotated § 4-18-103 provides in pertinent part: (a) Any person who commits any of the following acts shall be liable to the state or to the political subdivision for three (3) times the amount of damages that the state or the political subdivision sustains…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103(a)(1) — 1 case
Pamela Cotham v. Nicholas Jay Yeager (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103 (a)(1)-(3). Furthermore, the amended complaint contains no allegation that any of the defendants committed the violations listed in subsections (4) through (6).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103(a)(7) — 5 cases
Hamilton Cnty. Emergency Commc'ns Dist. v. BellSouth Telecomm. LLC, 852 F.3d 521 (6th Cir. 2017). “, political subdivisions of the State), in violation of T.C.A. § 4-18-103(a)(7). The district court construed this as a “false certification theory” claim, which — it stressed as “[ijmportantly" — “only applies where the underlying regulation is a ‘condition of payment,’ ”…”
Hamilton Cnty. Emergency Commc'ns Dist. v. BellSouth Telecomm., LLC, 154 F. Supp. 3d 666 (E.D. Tenn. 2016). “§ 4-18-103(a)(7). 25 This cause 'of action is often *696 referred to as a “reverse false claim.”
Hamilton Cnty. Emergency Commc'ns Dist. v. Bellsouth Telecomm., LLC, 890 F. Supp. 2d 862 (E.D. Tenn. 2012). “§ 4-18-103(a)(7). Cf. U.S. ex rel. A+ Homecare, Inc.”
Roane Cty. Emer. Commc'ns v. BellSouth (6th Cir. 2017). “, political subdivisions of the State), in violation of T.C.A. §4-18-103(a)(7). The district court construed this as a “false certification theory” claim, which—it stressed as “[i]mportantly”—“only applies where the underlying regulation is a ‘condition of payment,’” Hamilton…”
Pamela Cotham v. Nicholas Jay Yeager (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103 (a)(1)-(3). Furthermore, the amended complaint contains no allegation that any of the defendants committed the violations listed in subsections (4) through (6).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103(a)(8) — 1 case
Pamela Cotham v. Nicholas Jay Yeager (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103 (a)(1)-(3). Furthermore, the amended complaint contains no allegation that any of the defendants committed the violations listed in subsections (4) through (6).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103(a)(9) — 1 case
Pamela Cotham v. Nicholas Jay Yeager (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-18-103 (a)(1)-(3). Furthermore, the amended complaint contains no allegation that any of the defendants committed the violations listed in subsections (4) through (6).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.