Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-601 (2026)

Supervision of parolees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 2012, ch. 727, § 43.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2022 · leading case: Daniels v. Traughber, 984 S.W.2d 918 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
Daniels v. Traughber, 984 S.W.2d 918 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “The Court finds, since the victim’s family had requested that attorney Larry Roberts be notified of parole matters and since attorney Roberts formally notified the Board of this request by letter dated January 21, 1994, that attorney Larry Roberts qualifies under section…”
Reid v. Lee (M.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 2× “§ 40-28-116 (b) (permitting the parole board, in its discretion, to “impose any conditions and limitations that the board deems necessary”); Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-601 (b) (permitting a probation and parole officer to “suspend direct supervision of a parolee”).”
Jordan v. Lee (M.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 2× “§ 40-35-303 (c) (permitting both supervised and unsupervised probation, as appropriate); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-116 (b) (permitting the parole board, in its discretion, to “impose any conditions and limitations that the board deems necessary”); Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-28-601(b)(4) — 1 case
Daniels v. Traughber, 984 S.W.2d 918 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “The Court finds, since the victim’s family had requested that attorney Larry Roberts be notified of parole matters and since attorney Roberts formally notified the Board of this request by letter dated January 21, 1994, that attorney Larry Roberts qualifies under section…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.