Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108 (2026)

Career offender

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 545, s 12, eff. 7/1/2021.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 6; 2005, ch. 353, § 4; 2009 , ch. 603, § 3; 2010 , ch. 861, § 3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 201 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Benson v. State, 153 S.W.3d 27 (Tenn. 2005).
Benson v. State, 153 S.W.3d 27 (Tenn. 2005). · cites it 8× “NOTES [1] See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-108 (2003). [2] Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Jimmy Williams, 558 S.W.3d 633 (Tenn. 2018). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108 (2014). The defendant argues that he did not receive the requisite statutory notice that the State intended to seek enhanced sentencing and that therefore, the trial court should have sentenced him as a standard, Range I offender.”
State v. Wright, 836 S.W.2d 130 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). · cites it 16× “First, appellant argues that since petit larceny is no longer a felony then it is not a prior felony conviction as intended by *136 T.C.A. § 40-35-108. As the law existed when appellant was convicted of petit larceny, the larceny of any property valued at under $200.”
State of Tennessee v. Jonathan David Patterson, 564 S.W.3d 423 (Tenn. 2018). · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108 (a)(3) (2014) ("A career offender is a defendant who has received .”
State v. Taylor, 744 S.W.2d 919 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “See T.C.A. § 40-35-108. The defendant applied for sentencing pursuant to the Tennessee Community Cor *920 rections Act of 1985.”
State v. Walker, 29 S.W.3d 885 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “He argues that the trial court should have treated his prior convictions for aggravated assault and sale of cocaine as a single conviction under Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108 (b)(4), which provides as follows: Convictions for multiple felonies committed as part of a single course…”
State v. Blouvet, 965 S.W.2d 489 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 6× “” To support this theory, the State points to T.C.A. § 40-35-108, the career offender statute, where (a)(1) of that statute uses the term “prior felony convictions” while (a)(2) of that statute uses the term “felony convictions.”
State v. Buttrey, 756 S.W.2d 718 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “T.C.A. § 40-35-108, which creates this sentencing classification, states that “[a] defendant may be sentenced as an especially mitigated offender if the criteria herein are met.”
State v. Moss, 727 S.W.2d 229 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 2× “Moreover, considering the nature and circumstances of the crime and in the absence of any extreme mitigating factors, Defendant may not be sentenced as an especially mitigated offender under T.C.A. § 40-35-108. Consequently, T.C.A. § 40-35-105 (Supp.”
State v. Anderson, 835 S.W.2d 600 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. §§ 40-35-108, 40-35-50%) (1990); 40-35-501(f) (1982).”
State of Tennessee v. Susan Renee Bise, 380 S.W.3d 682 (Tenn. 2012). “§ 40-35-108. 17 . Id. § 40-35-109. 18 . See id.”
Terrance Lavar Davis v. State of Tennessee, 313 S.W.3d 751 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 2× “§ 40-35-108; or an especially mitigated Range I reduced offender, id.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(3) — 2 cases
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(5) — 2 cases
State v. Nelson, 275 S.W.3d 851 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008).
State v. Bottoms, 87 S.W.3d 95 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(A)(a)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(a) — 10 cases
State v. Copenny, 888 S.W.2d 450 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993).
Tonnie Jelks v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Eddie Readus (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019).
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Lewis Parks (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019).
State of Tennessee v. David Lynn Sisk (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(a)(1) — 18 cases
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Thomas (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
Tonnie Jelks v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
Anmichael Leonard v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(a)(2) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Stacy Lee Fleming (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(a)(3) — 20 cases
State v. Wright, 836 S.W.2d 130 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). “First, appellant argues that since petit larceny is no longer a felony then it is not a prior felony conviction as intended by *136 T.C.A. § 40-35-108. As the law existed when appellant was convicted of petit larceny, the larceny of any property valued at under $200.”
State of Tennessee v. Keith Trammell (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
John Willie Stone v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
Tonnie Jelks v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(a)(4) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Thomas (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
State of Tennessee v. Tyrone Cunningham (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(a)(l) — 1 case
State v. Copenny, 888 S.W.2d 450 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(b) — 3 cases
State v. Taylor, 744 S.W.2d 919 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). “See T.C.A. § 40-35-108. The defendant applied for sentencing pursuant to the Tennessee Community Cor *920 rections Act of 1985.”
State v. Rogers, 703 S.W.2d 166 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1985).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(b)(1) — 4 cases
State of Tennessee v. Ryan M. Delaby (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015).
State of Tennessee v. Elliot Arnaz Price (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026).
State of Tennessee v. Frank Lee Tate (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(b)(2) — 2 cases
State v. Wright, 836 S.W.2d 130 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). “First, appellant argues that since petit larceny is no longer a felony then it is not a prior felony conviction as intended by *136 T.C.A. § 40-35-108. As the law existed when appellant was convicted of petit larceny, the larceny of any property valued at under $200.”
State v. LaRue, 700 S.W.2d 574 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1985).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(b)(3) — 4 cases
State v. Max, 714 S.W.2d 289 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1986).
State v. Buttrey, 756 S.W.2d 718 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1988). “T.C.A. § 40-35-108, which creates this sentencing classification, states that “[a] defendant may be sentenced as an especially mitigated offender if the criteria herein are met.”
State v. Bennett, 798 S.W.2d 783 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1990).
State v. Willis, 735 S.W.2d 818 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(b)(3)(A) — 2 cases
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(b)(3)(B) — 1 case
United States v. Orona, 724 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(b)(4) — 17 cases
State v. Copenny, 888 S.W.2d 450 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993).
State of Tennessee v. Jerry L. Sandridge (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005).
State of Tennessee v. Frank Lee Tate (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
State of Tennessee v. Terrance Burke (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(b)(4)(2003) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Frank Lee Tate (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(b)(5) — 4 cases
State of Tennessee v. Donald Peden (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
Rollins v. State (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(c) — 41 cases
Benson v. State, 153 S.W.3d 27 (Tenn. 2005). “NOTES [1] See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-108 (2003). [2] Tenn.”
State v. Smith, 48 S.W.3d 159 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).
David Cantrell v. Joe Easterling, Warden, 346 S.W.3d 445 (Tenn. 2011).
State v. Wright, 836 S.W.2d 130 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). “First, appellant argues that since petit larceny is no longer a felony then it is not a prior felony conviction as intended by *136 T.C.A. § 40-35-108. As the law existed when appellant was convicted of petit larceny, the larceny of any property valued at under $200.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-108(d) — 3 cases
James Sellars v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014).
State of Tennessee v. Darrell Johnson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009).
State of Tennessee v. Marcus Moore (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.