Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121 (2026)

Criminal gang offenses - Enhanced punishment - Procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 545, s 13, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1034, Secs.s 1, s 2, s 3 eff. 4/28/2016.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 415, s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 357, s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.

Acts 1997 , ch. 437, § 1; 2011 , ch. 493, § 2; 2012 , ch. 848, § 34.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 55 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015).
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). · cites it 134× “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Minor, 546 S.W.3d 59 (Tenn. 2018). · cites it 28× “18, 2016), declaring the criminal gang offense statute, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121 (b) (2014), unconstitutional applies to the defendant’s appeal because it was pending on direct review when Bonds was decided.”
Serrano v. State, 133 S.W.3d 599 (Tenn. 2004). · cites it 2× “In Serrano’s petition for post-conviction relief, he alleged the following pre-waiver issues: (1) that the indictment failed to charge him with the violation of the anti-gang statute located at Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121; (2) that the indictment failed to charge…”
Manuel Vasquez v. Tony Rackauckas, 734 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “Codified Laws § 22 -10A-1(1) (same); Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121 (a)(1) (same); Utah Code Ann.”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 134× “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
State of Tennessee v. Robert Fusco, 404 S.W.3d 504 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012). “h greater weight in favor of transfer given to offenses against the person; (4) WTiether the offense was committed in an aggressive and premeditated manner; (5) The possible rehabilitation of the child by use of procedures, services and facilities currently available to the…”
State of Tennessee v. William Jermaine Stripling (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 45× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121 (b) (2014). As applicable to this case, “criminal gang offense” is defined as follows: A criminal offense committed prior to July 1, 2013 that: (i) During the perpetration of which the defendant knowingly causes or threatens to cause death or bodily…”
State of Tennessee v. John Foxx (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022). · cites it 32× “Constitutionality of Statute Defendant contends that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 violates his right to substantive due process, specifically because subsection (a) does not itself require a nexus to criminal activity.”
State of Tennessee v. Gerald Lamont Byars (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). · cites it 30× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121 (b) (2014). As applicable to this case, a “criminal gang offense” is defined as follows: “[t]he commission or attempted commission, facilitation of, solicitation of, or conspiracy to commit [p]ossession of a controlled substance .”
State of Tennessee v. Kaylecia Woodard (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). · cites it 25× “Additionally, the defendant asserts that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 is unconstitutional on its face because it is overbroad so as to impinge upon her constitutional right to freedom of speech and because it offends principles of due process.”
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Turner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). · cites it 22× “Criminal Gang Enhancement Defendant argues that the criminal gang enhancement applied to some of his convictions pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 should be vacated in light of this Court’s decision in State v.”
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Minor (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). · cites it 15× “counts of aggravated burglary, one count of aggravated assault, one count of convicted felon in possession of a firearm, one count of employing a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, one count of employing a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. John Foxx (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022). “Constitutionality of Statute Defendant contends that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 violates his right to substantive due process, specifically because subsection (a) does not itself require a nexus to criminal activity.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(1) — 4 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
State of Tennessee v. John Foxx (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022). “Constitutionality of Statute Defendant contends that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 violates his right to substantive due process, specifically because subsection (a) does not itself require a nexus to criminal activity.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(1)(2014) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Kaylecia Woodard (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). “Additionally, the defendant asserts that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 is unconstitutional on its face because it is overbroad so as to impinge upon her constitutional right to freedom of speech and because it offends principles of due process.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(1)(A) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(1)(B) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(2) — 4 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
State of Tennessee v. John Foxx (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022). “Constitutionality of Statute Defendant contends that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 violates his right to substantive due process, specifically because subsection (a) does not itself require a nexus to criminal activity.”
State of Tennessee v. Kaylecia Woodard (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). “Additionally, the defendant asserts that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 is unconstitutional on its face because it is overbroad so as to impinge upon her constitutional right to freedom of speech and because it offends principles of due process.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(2)(C) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(2)(D) — 3 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
State of Tennessee v. Kaylecia Woodard (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). “Additionally, the defendant asserts that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 is unconstitutional on its face because it is overbroad so as to impinge upon her constitutional right to freedom of speech and because it offends principles of due process.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(2)(D)(G) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(2)(F) — 1 case
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(2)(G) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(3) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. John Foxx (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022). “Constitutionality of Statute Defendant contends that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 violates his right to substantive due process, specifically because subsection (a) does not itself require a nexus to criminal activity.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(3)(A) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(3)(A)(i) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(3)(A)(ii) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(3)(B) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(3)(B)(xxv) — 3 cases
State of Tennessee v. Gerald Lamont Byars (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121 (b) (2014). As applicable to this case, a “criminal gang offense” is defined as follows: “[t]he commission or attempted commission, facilitation of, solicitation of, or conspiracy to commit [p]ossession of a controlled substance .”
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Turner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). “Criminal Gang Enhancement Defendant argues that the criminal gang enhancement applied to some of his convictions pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 should be vacated in light of this Court’s decision in State v.”
State of Tennessee v. John Foxx (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022). “Constitutionality of Statute Defendant contends that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 violates his right to substantive due process, specifically because subsection (a) does not itself require a nexus to criminal activity.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(3)(B)(xxvi) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Turner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). “Criminal Gang Enhancement Defendant argues that the criminal gang enhancement applied to some of his convictions pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 should be vacated in light of this Court’s decision in State v.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(4) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. John Foxx (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022). “Constitutionality of Statute Defendant contends that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 violates his right to substantive due process, specifically because subsection (a) does not itself require a nexus to criminal activity.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(4)(A) — 3 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
State of Tennessee v. John Foxx (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022). “Constitutionality of Statute Defendant contends that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 violates his right to substantive due process, specifically because subsection (a) does not itself require a nexus to criminal activity.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(4)(B)(ii) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(l) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
Manuel Vasquez v. Tony Rackauckas, 734 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2013). “Codified Laws § 22 -10A-1(1) (same); Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121 (a)(1) (same); Utah Code Ann.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(l)(A) — 1 case
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(a)(l)(B) — 1 case
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(b) — 18 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Minor, 546 S.W.3d 59 (Tenn. 2018). “18, 2016), declaring the criminal gang offense statute, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121 (b) (2014), unconstitutional applies to the defendant’s appeal because it was pending on direct review when Bonds was decided.”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
State of Tennessee v. William Jermaine Stripling (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121 (b) (2014). As applicable to this case, “criminal gang offense” is defined as follows: A criminal offense committed prior to July 1, 2013 that: (i) During the perpetration of which the defendant knowingly causes or threatens to cause death or bodily…”
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Turner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). “Criminal Gang Enhancement Defendant argues that the criminal gang enhancement applied to some of his convictions pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 should be vacated in light of this Court’s decision in State v.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(b)(2) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. John Foxx (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022). “Constitutionality of Statute Defendant contends that Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-121 violates his right to substantive due process, specifically because subsection (a) does not itself require a nexus to criminal activity.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(c) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(d) — 1 case
State of Tennesse v. Ronnie Lucas Wilson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(e) — 2 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(g) — 5 cases
State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “' At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. § 40-35-121. Defendant Bonds ■ received…”
State of Tennessee v. Dashun Shackleford (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-121(i) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “At the sentencing hearing, the trial court enhanced Defendants Bonds, Bishop, and Sullivan to one classification higher for their convictions of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault pursuant to subsection (b) of T.C.A. §40-35-121. Defendant Bonds received an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.