Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302 (2026)

Part definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:

Acts 2000, ch. 577, § 1; 2008, ch. 1163, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2025 · leading case: State of Tennessee v. Melissa Ann Layman, 214 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2007).
State of Tennessee v. Melissa Ann Layman, 214 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 30× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302 (2) (2006). With regard to the right to confer, the prosecutor is required to confer with the victim before the final disposition of a criminal offense and before the commencement of a trial.”
State v. Jordan, 325 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2010). “§ 40-38-302(4)(A)(iii)(b) (2003). Accordingly, we hold that it was not error for the trial court to permit Ms.”
William W. York v. Tennessee Bd. Of Parole, 502 S.W.3d 783 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “§ 40-38-302(2)(E), (4)(A)(iii). Consequently, since 1998, victims or their families, if the victim is deceased, have the right to attend and be heard at parole hearings.”
State of Tennessee v. Eugenio Gomez Ruiz (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302 (2)(C) (2019).”
Michael Davis v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. § 40-38-302(3)-(4)(A)(iii)(a). As a victim, Ms.”
State of Tennessee v. Juan Manuel Mejia Nunez (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “” Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-38-302(4)(A)(i)-(ii), the term “victim” includes both “[a] natural person against whom a crime was committed” and “the parent or legal guardian” of a minor victim.”
State of Tennessee v. Melissa Ann Layman - Concurring & Dissenting (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302 (c)(2) (2003).”
State of Tennessee v. David Lynn Jordan (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302 (4)(A)(iii)(b).”
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Victor S. Johnson, III v. Mark Gwyn (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “However, despite being victims as defined by Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-38-302(4)(A)(iii)(a), Petitioners have not shown that their constitutional or statutory rights in this capacity -8- entitle them to unique access to the redacted TBI file or that the trial court’s…”
James M. Morris v. Tennessee Bd. of Prob. & Parole (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 40-38-302(2)(E), (4)(A)(iii). Consequently, since 1998, victims or their families, if the victim is deceased, have the right to attend and be heard at parole hearings.”
State of Tennessee v. Letalvis Cobbins In Re: Gary Christian (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “…whom a crime was committed” is deceased, then the term “victim” for relevant purposes means “[a] family member.” T.C.A. 40-38-302(4)(A). -19-”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302(2) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Melissa Ann Layman, 214 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302 (2) (2006). With regard to the right to confer, the prosecutor is required to confer with the victim before the final disposition of a criminal offense and before the commencement of a trial.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302(2)(C) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Melissa Ann Layman, 214 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302 (2) (2006). With regard to the right to confer, the prosecutor is required to confer with the victim before the final disposition of a criminal offense and before the commencement of a trial.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302(2)(E) — 2 cases
William W. York v. Tennessee Bd. Of Parole, 502 S.W.3d 783 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “§ 40-38-302(2)(E), (4)(A)(iii). Consequently, since 1998, victims or their families, if the victim is deceased, have the right to attend and be heard at parole hearings.”
James M. Morris v. Tennessee Bd. of Prob. & Parole (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 40-38-302(2)(E), (4)(A)(iii). Consequently, since 1998, victims or their families, if the victim is deceased, have the right to attend and be heard at parole hearings.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302(3) — 1 case
Michael Davis v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). “See T.C.A. § 40-38-302(3)-(4)(A)(iii)(a). As a victim, Ms.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302(4)(A) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Melissa Ann Layman, 214 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302 (2) (2006). With regard to the right to confer, the prosecutor is required to confer with the victim before the final disposition of a criminal offense and before the commencement of a trial.”
State of Tennessee v. Letalvis Cobbins In Re: Gary Christian (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “…whom a crime was committed” is deceased, then the term “victim” for relevant purposes means “[a] family member.” T.C.A. 40-38-302(4)(A). -19-”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302(4)(A)(i) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Juan Manuel Mejia Nunez (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). “” Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-38-302(4)(A)(i)-(ii), the term “victim” includes both “[a] natural person against whom a crime was committed” and “the parent or legal guardian” of a minor victim.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302(4)(A)(iii)(a) — 1 case
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Victor S. Johnson, III v. Mark Gwyn (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “However, despite being victims as defined by Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-38-302(4)(A)(iii)(a), Petitioners have not shown that their constitutional or statutory rights in this capacity -8- entitle them to unique access to the redacted TBI file or that the trial court’s…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302(4)(A)(iii)(b) — 1 case
State v. Jordan, 325 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2010). “§ 40-38-302(4)(A)(iii)(b) (2003). Accordingly, we hold that it was not error for the trial court to permit Ms.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302(c)(2) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Melissa Ann Layman, 214 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-38-302 (2) (2006). With regard to the right to confer, the prosecutor is required to confer with the victim before the final disposition of a criminal offense and before the commencement of a trial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.