Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-39-217 (2026)

Community notification system

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Added by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 751,s 1, eff. 4/22/2014.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2020–2023 · leading case: Reid v. Lee (M.D. Tenn. 2022).
Reid v. Lee (M.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-39-217 (a)(2). 4. Restrictions on Where a Registrant Can Live or Work A registered offender may not knowingly establish a primary or secondary residence or any other living accommodation or knowingly accept employment within one thousand feet (1,000’) of the…”
Jordan v. Lee (M.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-39-217 (a)(2). 4. Restrictions on Where a Registrant Can Live or Work A registered offender may not knowingly establish a primary or secondary residence or any other living accommodation or knowingly accept employment within one thousand feet (1,000’) of the…”
Jordan v. Lee (M.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-39-217 (a)(2). 4. Restrictions on Where a Registrant Can Live or Work A registered offender may not knowingly establish a primary or secondary residence or any other living accommodation or knowingly accept employment within one thousand feet (1,000’) of the…”
Does 1 - 8 v. Lee (M.D. Tenn. 2023). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-39-217 (a)(2). 4. Restrictions on Where a Registrant Can Live or Work A registered offender may not knowingly establish a primary or secondary residence or any other living accommodation or knowingly accept employment within one thousand feet (1,000’) of the…”
Doe v. Rausch (W.D. Tenn. 2023). · cites it 2× “Act 751 (2014) created Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-39-217 , which authorizes local governments to establish 7 The Court takes judicial notice that § 40-39-211(h) has since been amended to prohibit three or more sexual offenders from cohabitating.”
Jackson v. Rausch (E.D. Tenn. 2021). “§ 40-39-217 . As to the effect of banishment, Plaintiff avers that he is selling his house and business and moving to a new home but worries that the Acts’ restrictions will prevent him from finding a suitable place to move.”
Huffman v. Lee (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “§ 49-39-206 (d); § 40-39-217. Plaintiff has set forth no basis for concluding that Grady and/or Hoard’s conduct, even if motivated by some personal animus, violated any constitutional right to Plaintiff’s privacy or due process.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.