Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-203 (2026)

Examination of affiant

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 539, s 3, eff. 7/1/2021.

Code 1858, § 5020; Shan., § 6979; Code 1932, § 11518; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 40-702; Acts 1999, ch. 51, § 1; 2003 , ch. 366, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: State of Tennessee v. Felicia Jones, 512 S.W.3d 258 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
State of Tennessee v. Felicia Jones, 512 S.W.3d 258 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 10× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-6-203(a) provides that “[ujpon information made to any magistrate of the commission of a public offense, the magistrate shall examine, on oath, the affiant or affiants, reduce the examination to writing, and cause the examination to be signed…”
State of Tennessee v. Steven Shell, 512 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “We agree with the analysis expressed by the panel in Felicia Jones that the signing of the affidavit of complaint “before a notary public rather than a qualified judicial officer did not meet the requirements of [Code] section 40-6-203(a) and Rule 3” and that this defect…”
State v. Wilson, 6 S.W.3d 504 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-6-203. The magistrate then reviews the affidavit of complaint to determine whether there is probable cause for an arrest.”
United States v. Medina-Almaguer, 559 F.3d 420 (6th Cir. 2009). “3(c); see also Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-6-203. An affidavit of complaint, we also realize, is similar to preliminary-examination testimony in at least one respect: It has “substantially greater indicia of reliability than mere police reports” because it is given “under oath and…”
State of Tennessee v. Jay Junior Heifner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025). · cites it 13× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-203 (a); see also Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Jay Junior Heifner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). · cites it 13× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-203 (a); see also Tenn.”
State of Tennessee David Allen Jackson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 12× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-203 (b)(1). The Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure provide that when a person is arrested without a warrant, he “shall be taken without unnecessary delay before the nearest appropriate magistrate” and that “[a]n affidavit of complaint shall be filed…”
State of Tennessee v. Louis Grieco (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). · cites it 6× “T.C.A. § 40-6-203(a)-(b). Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure mandates that an affidavit of complaint “be made on oath before a magistrate or a neutral and detached court clerk authorized by Rule 4 to make a probable cause determination.”
State of Tennessee v. Lisa Hayes (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-203 (a) (Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-6-203(a) provides: “Upon information made to any magistrate of the commission of a public offense, the magistrate shall examine, on oath, the affiant or affiants, reduce the examination to writing, and cause…”
State of Tennessee v. Andrew Hall (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “§ 40-6-204 addresses the written “examination” of the law enforcement officer which sets forth facts given by the officer to establish probable cause for an arrest, as is required by T.C.A. § 40-6-203. T.C.A. § 40-6-204 does not require the magistrate to state in the warrant…”
State of Tennessee v. Jason Gonzalez (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Code section 40-6-203(a) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (a) Upon information made to any magistrate of the commission of a public offense, the magistrate shall examine, -8- on oath, the affiant or affiants, reduce the examination to writing, and cause the examination…”
State v. Perez (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “§ 40-6- 205. Thus, an arrest warrant can only be validly issued upon probable cause being shown by written affidavit pursuant to Rule 4 and T.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-203(a) — 9 cases
State of Tennessee v. Felicia Jones, 512 S.W.3d 258 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-6-203(a) provides that “[ujpon information made to any magistrate of the commission of a public offense, the magistrate shall examine, on oath, the affiant or affiants, reduce the examination to writing, and cause the examination to be signed…”
State of Tennessee v. Steven Shell, 512 S.W.3d 267 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “We agree with the analysis expressed by the panel in Felicia Jones that the signing of the affidavit of complaint “before a notary public rather than a qualified judicial officer did not meet the requirements of [Code] section 40-6-203(a) and Rule 3” and that this defect…”
State of Tennessee David Allen Jackson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-203 (b)(1). The Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure provide that when a person is arrested without a warrant, he “shall be taken without unnecessary delay before the nearest appropriate magistrate” and that “[a]n affidavit of complaint shall be filed…”
State of Tennessee v. Louis Grieco (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). “T.C.A. § 40-6-203(a)-(b). Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure mandates that an affidavit of complaint “be made on oath before a magistrate or a neutral and detached court clerk authorized by Rule 4 to make a probable cause determination.”
State of Tennessee v. Lisa Hayes (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-203 (a) (Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-6-203(a) provides: “Upon information made to any magistrate of the commission of a public offense, the magistrate shall examine, on oath, the affiant or affiants, reduce the examination to writing, and cause…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-203(b)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Felicia Jones, 512 S.W.3d 258 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-6-203(a) provides that “[ujpon information made to any magistrate of the commission of a public offense, the magistrate shall examine, on oath, the affiant or affiants, reduce the examination to writing, and cause the examination to be signed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.