Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-310 (2026)

Construction of ambiguous provisions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any ambiguity in this part or §§ 39-13-601 - [former] 39-13-603 [repealed] shall be resolved in favor of the aggrieved party and against the state.

Acts 1994, ch. 964, § 13.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2002–2003 · leading case: Robinson v. Fulliton, 140 S.W.3d 312 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Robinson v. Fulliton, 140 S.W.3d 312 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “§ 40-6-310 (1997). Thus, in striking the balance, section 40-6-310 indicates an intent that ambiguities be resolved in favor of protecting the privacy interest of aggrieved individuals, at least in situations in which the wiretapping is done by the State or other law enforcement…”

Christopher N. Robinson v. William Fulliton (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-6-310 (1997). Thus, in striking the balance, section 40-6-310 indicates an intent that ambiguities be resolved in favor of protecting the privacy interest of aggrieved individuals, at least in situations in which the wiretapping is done by the State or other…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.