Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-113 (2026)

Limitations on loan charges, commitment fees and brokerage commissions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1979, ch. 203, § 12.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2003–2024 · leading case: Terry v. Cmty. Bank of N. Virginia, 255 F. Supp. 2d 817 (W.D. Tenn. 2003).
Terry v. Cmty. Bank of N. Virginia, 255 F. Supp. 2d 817 (W.D. Tenn. 2003). · cites it 2× “§ 47-14-113 should be dismissed because Plaintiffs cannot first argue that CBNV is not the lender who funded Plaintiffs’ loans, and then later assert that CBNV was a lender who unlawfully assessed loan charges.”
Bandy v. Roberts (E.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-113 (c)–(e). The Court has found that, on the Third Loan, Roberts charged Bandy a twelve-percent- per-year interest rate with interest pre-deducted from the loan disbursement, a ten percent “loan designation” or origination fee, charges for various back…”
Equine Luxury Props., LLC v. Com. Capital Bidco, Inc. (W.D. Mich. 2024). “Tenn. Code § 47-14-113(d) (emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-113(d) — 1 case
Equine Luxury Props., LLC v. Com. Capital Bidco, Inc. (W.D. Mich. 2024). “Tenn. Code § 47-14-113(d) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.