Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-101
Short title
This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977."
Acts 1977, ch. 438, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 334
cases (43 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: Tucker v. Sierra Builders
Tucker v. Sierra Builders (2005)
“Acts 1107 , codified at Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-101 -116 (2001 & Supp.”
Ganzevoort v. Russell (1997)
“NOTES [1] Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 47-18-101 to XX-XX-XXXX (1995).”
Brungard v. Caprice Records, Inc. (1980)
“This case involves fraud in the inducement and the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977, T.C.A. § 47-18-101 et seq. On July 20, 1978, the plaintiff-appellee, Peggy Brungard, filed suit against the defendants, Caprice Records, Inc.”
Pyburn v. Bill Heard Chevrolet (2001)
“Plaintiff sued pursuant to the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), T.C.A. § 47-18-101, et seq., and also asserted several common law theories of recovery.”
Robinson v. Currey (2004)
“Plaintiffs based their claims against Defendants upon the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-101 et. seq., and the Tennessee Residential Property Disclosures Act, Tenn.”
Rosenberg v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc. (2006)
“(collectively referred to herein as "BCBS-TN"), and allege the following upon information and belief, except as to paragraphs pertaining to plaintiffs' own actions, which are alleged upon personal knowledge: INTRODUCTION 1.”
Doe v. HCA Health Services of Tennessee, Inc. (2001)
“In addition, the Does’ complaint alleged that the hospital violated the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 47-18-101 to 47-18-125 (Supp.”
Tamarin Lindenberg v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co. (2018)
“First, Defendant argues that Riad and Myint are limited to cases involving tortious or quasi- tortious acts because both cases involved claims under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), T.C.A. §§ 47-18-101, et seq. But although both cases indeed involved TCPA and…”
Charles Fox v. Amazon.com, Inc. (2019)
“, (2) breached a duty to warn Plaintiff Megan Fox about the defective or unreasonably dangerous nature of that product, in violation of Tennessee tort law, and (3) caused Plaintiff Megan Fox confusion or misunderstanding about the source of that product, in violation of the…”
Discover Bank v. Morgan (2012)
“§§ 1681 -1681x (2006), and the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 47-18-101 to -130 (2001 & 2011 Supp.”
Killingsworth v. Ted Russell Ford, Inc. (2003)
“Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-101, et seq. (2001 & Supp.”
Win Myint and wife Patti KI. Myint v. Allstate Insurance Company (1998)
“The insured contends that such refusal constitutes an “unfair or deceptive act or practice,” in violation of the Consumer Protection Act, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 47-18-101, et seq. 1 In contrast, the insurer insists that Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.