Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (2026)

Part definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 803, s 3, eff. 1/1/2023.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 459, s 2, eff. 9/30/2019.

Acts 1977, ch. 438, § 3; 1986, ch. 860, § 1; 1988, ch. 974, § 1; 1999, ch. 473, § 1; 2008 , ch. 873, § 1; 2010 , ch. 779, § 1; 2010 , ch. 1055, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 75 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: ATS Se., Inc. v. Carrier Corp., 18 S.W.3d 626 (Tenn. 2000).
ATS Se., Inc. v. Carrier Corp., 18 S.W.3d 626 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 21× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (a) (1979) (codifying 1977 Tenn.”
Ganzevoort v. Russell, 949 S.W.2d 293 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 8× “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (2)(1995). The Act defines "trade" and "commerce" in pertinent part, as follows: "`Trade,' `commerce,' or `consumer transaction' means the .”
Walker v. Sunrise Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc., 249 S.W.3d 301 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 4× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(2) (defining “[c]onsumer” as “any natural person.”
Johnson v. John Hancock Funds, 217 S.W.3d 414 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 10× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (5), (10). 7 .”
Messer Griesheim Indus., Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc., 45 S.W.3d 588 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 6× “T.C.A. § 47-18-103(11) (Supp.2000) defines the terms “trade,” “commerce,” or “consumer transaction” to mean “the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution of *610 any goods, services, or property, tangible or intangible, real, personal, or mixed, and other…”
Fayne v. Vincent, 301 S.W.3d 162 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 4× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(11). Relying in part on the Act’s purpose of “maintaining ethical standards of dealing between persons engaged in business and the consuming public,” Tenn.”
Pursell v. First Am. Nat'l Bank, 937 S.W.2d 838 (Tenn. 1996). · cites it 6× “In support of its argument, the Bank relies upon Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(9) (1995) which provides that “Trade,” “commerce,” or “consumer transaction” means the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution of any goods, services, or property, tangible or…”
Wagner v. Fleming, 139 S.W.3d 295 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 8× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (2). Instead, the plaintiff was acting as a seller because he was offering real estate for sale.”
Poole v. Union Planters Bank, N.A., 337 S.W.3d 771 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 47-18-103 defines the terms trade, commerce, and consumer transaction to include "the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution of any goods, services, or property, tangible or intangible, real, personal, or mixed, and…”
Win Myint & wife Patti KI. Myint v. Allstate Ins. Co., 970 S.W.2d 920 (Tenn. 1998). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(9) (1988). While the sale of a policy of insurance easily falls under this definition of “trade” and “commerce,” we conclude that Allstate’s conduct in handling the Myints’ insurance policy was neither unfair nor deceptive.”
Steed Realty v. Oveisi, 823 S.W.2d 195 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “T.C.A. § 47-18-103(6). Having heretofore held that Steed is liable for promissory fraud because he did not intend to carry out the promises that he made when he made them, we also find that Steed “knowingly” violated the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act.”
Stevenson v. J.C. Bradford & Co. (In Re Cannon), 230 B.R. 546 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1999). · cites it 6× “T.C.A. § 47-18-103(2) and (9). 66 See also Hand v.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(1) — 3 cases
Nichols v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 706 F. Supp. 1309 (M.D. Tenn. 1989).
Skinner v. Steele, 730 S.W.2d 335 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).
Akers v. Bonifasi, 629 F. Supp. 1212 (M.D. Tenn. 1985).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(10) — 3 cases
Johnson v. John Hancock Funds, 217 S.W.3d 414 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (5), (10). 7 .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(11) — 9 cases
Fayne v. Vincent, 301 S.W.3d 162 (Tenn. 2009). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(11). Relying in part on the Act’s purpose of “maintaining ethical standards of dealing between persons engaged in business and the consuming public,” Tenn.”
Johnson v. John Hancock Funds, 217 S.W.3d 414 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (5), (10). 7 .”
Wagner v. Fleming, 139 S.W.3d 295 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (2). Instead, the plaintiff was acting as a seller because he was offering real estate for sale.”
Poole v. Union Planters Bank, N.A., 337 S.W.3d 771 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 47-18-103 defines the terms trade, commerce, and consumer transaction to include "the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution of any goods, services, or property, tangible or intangible, real, personal, or mixed, and…”
Messer Griesheim Indus., Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc., 45 S.W.3d 588 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “T.C.A. § 47-18-103(11) (Supp.2000) defines the terms “trade,” “commerce,” or “consumer transaction” to mean “the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution of *610 any goods, services, or property, tangible or intangible, real, personal, or mixed, and other…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(12) — 1 case
In the Matter of George W. Walls, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(13) — 1 case
Fontaine Taylor v. Mark Thomas, 624 F. App'x 322 (6th Cir. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(14) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(15) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(18) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(19) — 3 cases
Edward Hanson v. J.C. Hobbs Co., Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(2) — 10 cases
Walker v. Sunrise Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc., 249 S.W.3d 301 (Tenn. 2008). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(2) (defining “[c]onsumer” as “any natural person.”
Fayne v. Vincent, 301 S.W.3d 162 (Tenn. 2009). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(11). Relying in part on the Act’s purpose of “maintaining ethical standards of dealing between persons engaged in business and the consuming public,” Tenn.”
ATS Se., Inc. v. Carrier Corp., 18 S.W.3d 626 (Tenn. 2000). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (a) (1979) (codifying 1977 Tenn.”
Wagner v. Fleming, 139 S.W.3d 295 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (2). Instead, the plaintiff was acting as a seller because he was offering real estate for sale.”
Smith Corona Corp. v. Pelikan, Inc., 784 F. Supp. 452 (M.D. Tenn. 1992).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(2)(1995) — 1 case
Ganzevoort v. Russell, 949 S.W.2d 293 (Tenn. 1997). “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (2)(1995). The Act defines "trade" and "commerce" in pertinent part, as follows: "`Trade,' `commerce,' or `consumer transaction' means the .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(20) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(24) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(4) — 1 case
Akers v. Bonifasi, 629 F. Supp. 1212 (M.D. Tenn. 1985).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(5) — 3 cases
Messer Griesheim Indus., Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc., 45 S.W.3d 588 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “T.C.A. § 47-18-103(11) (Supp.2000) defines the terms “trade,” “commerce,” or “consumer transaction” to mean “the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution of *610 any goods, services, or property, tangible or intangible, real, personal, or mixed, and other…”
Johnson v. John Hancock Funds, 217 S.W.3d 414 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (5), (10). 7 .”
Akers v. Bonifasi, 629 F. Supp. 1212 (M.D. Tenn. 1985).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(6) — 5 cases
Steed Realty v. Oveisi, 823 S.W.2d 195 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). “T.C.A. § 47-18-103(6). Having heretofore held that Steed is liable for promissory fraud because he did not intend to carry out the promises that he made when he made them, we also find that Steed “knowingly” violated the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act.”
Murvin v. Cofer, 968 S.W.2d 304 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Rebekah v. Crownover (In Re Crownover), 417 B.R. 45 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009).
Myers v. The Hexagon Co., LLC, 54 F. Supp. 2d 742 (E.D. Tenn. 1998).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(7) — 8 cases
ATS Se., Inc. v. Carrier Corp., 18 S.W.3d 626 (Tenn. 2000). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (a) (1979) (codifying 1977 Tenn.”
Smith Corona Corp. v. Pelikan, Inc., 784 F. Supp. 452 (M.D. Tenn. 1992).
Olin Corp. v. Lambda Elec., Inc., 39 F. Supp. 2d 912 (E.D. Tenn. 1998).
Operations Mgmt. Int'l, Inc. v. Tengasco, Inc., 35 F. Supp. 2d 1052 (E.D. Tenn. 1999).
Edward Hanson v. J.C. Hobbs Co., Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(8) — 2 cases
Skinner v. Steele, 730 S.W.2d 335 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).
MacKey v. Judy's Foods, Inc., 654 F. Supp. 1465 (M.D. Tenn. 1987).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(9) — 12 cases
Pursell v. First Am. Nat'l Bank, 937 S.W.2d 838 (Tenn. 1996). “In support of its argument, the Bank relies upon Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(9) (1995) which provides that “Trade,” “commerce,” or “consumer transaction” means the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution of any goods, services, or property, tangible or…”
Walker v. Sunrise Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc., 249 S.W.3d 301 (Tenn. 2008). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(2) (defining “[c]onsumer” as “any natural person.”
Win Myint & wife Patti KI. Myint v. Allstate Ins. Co., 970 S.W.2d 920 (Tenn. 1998). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-103(9) (1988). While the sale of a policy of insurance easily falls under this definition of “trade” and “commerce,” we conclude that Allstate’s conduct in handling the Myints’ insurance policy was neither unfair nor deceptive.”
Messer Griesheim Indus., Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc., 45 S.W.3d 588 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “T.C.A. § 47-18-103(11) (Supp.2000) defines the terms “trade,” “commerce,” or “consumer transaction” to mean “the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution of *610 any goods, services, or property, tangible or intangible, real, personal, or mixed, and other…”
Stevenson v. J.C. Bradford & Co. (In Re Cannon), 230 B.R. 546 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1999). “T.C.A. § 47-18-103(2) and (9). 66 See also Hand v.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(9)(1995) — 1 case
Ganzevoort v. Russell, 949 S.W.2d 293 (Tenn. 1997). “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (2)(1995). The Act defines "trade" and "commerce" in pertinent part, as follows: "`Trade,' `commerce,' or `consumer transaction' means the .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(a) — 4 cases
ATS Se., Inc. v. Carrier Corp., 18 S.W.3d 626 (Tenn. 2000). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103 (a) (1979) (codifying 1977 Tenn.”
Am. Bldgs. Co. v. White, 640 S.W.2d 569 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1982).
Klotz v. Underwood, 563 F. Supp. 335 (E.D. Tenn. 1982).
Chandler v. Prudential Ins. Co., 715 S.W.2d 615 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(e) — 2 cases
Haverlah v. Memphis Aviation, Inc., 674 S.W.2d 297 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984).
Smith Corona Corp. v. Pelikan, Inc., 784 F. Supp. 452 (M.D. Tenn. 1992).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-103(h) — 2 cases
Cnty. of Johnson v. United States Gypsum Co., 580 F. Supp. 284 (E.D. Tenn. 1984).
Chandler v. Prudential Ins. Co., 715 S.W.2d 615 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.