Tenn. Code Ann. » Tenn. Code / Title 47 / Chapter 2 / Part 6
Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-606 (2026)

What constitutes acceptance of goods

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1963, ch. 81, § 1 (2-606).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: Audio Visual Artistry v. Stephen Tanzer, 403 S.W.3d 789 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Billy Hughes v. Lee Masonry Prods., Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-606 . Here, Plaintiffs signified their acceptance of the bricks and acted inconsistently with Defendants’ ownership by installing the bricks on the house despite the bricks’ nonconforming appearance.”
Iron Horse Energy Servs., Inc. v. S. Concrete Prods., Inc. (W.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 2× “3d at 806 (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-606 ). “Whether a time for taking an action [under the Tennessee statute] is reasonable depends on the nature, purpose, and circumstances of the action.”
BiotronX, LLC v. Tech One Biomedical, LLC (M.D. Tenn. 2020). “their 5 procurement; or (b) if the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in his pleading, testimony or otherwise in court that a contract for sale was made, but the contract is not enforceable under this provision beyond the quantity of goods admitted; or (c) with…”
Queen City Pastry, LLC v. Bakery Tech. Enter., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “§ 47-2-606 (2001). As provided by the parties’ agreement, once Queen City accepted the goods, its “sole and exclusive remedy with respect to such goods, including the right to revoke acceptance, [was] limited to claims under Seller’s Warranty, if any, as set forth [in the terms…”
Audio Visual Artistry v. Stephen Tanzer, 403 S.W.3d 789 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-606 . With the exception of those goods identified by the court’s order as “rejected,” there is no indication in the record that Mr.”
Holt v. Wilmoth, 336 S.W.3d 234 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 47-2-606 and 47-2-607 (2001).”
Shomaker Lumber Co., Inc. v. Hardwood Sales & Plan. Servs., Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “Hardwood Sales raises the following issues, as slightly reworded, for our review: (1) Whether the trial court erred when it determined that Hardwood Sales “accepted” any shipments of lumber in dispute pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 47-2-606; (2) Whether the trial…”
Trinity Indus., Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co., 77 S.W.3d 159 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “§ 47-2-606. McKinnon asserts that what it ordered was not goods but a bridge, and a *176 “bridge is not a bridge until it is completed.”
Pyamid Computers v. Ben Gasparro (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 5× “Section 47-2-606 of the Tennessee Code states the following, in pertinent part: (1) Acceptance of goods occurs when the buyer: (a) after a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods signifies to the seller that the goods are conforming or that he will take or retain them in…”
Ricky Riddle v. Heartland Nursery Co. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-606 (1) says that a buyer has accepted the goods if he has done any of the following: (a) after a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods signifies to the seller that the goods are conforming or that he will take or retain them in spite of their…”
Trinity Indus., Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co., Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-606 . McKinnon asserts that what it ordered was not goods but a bridge, and a “bridge is not a bridge until it is completed.”
Harry J. Whelchel Co. v. Ripley Tractor Co., 900 S.W.2d 691 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 47-2-606 (1992). Once “acceptance” with knowledge of nonconformity has occurred, the buyer cannot revoke acceptance unless it was on the assumption that the nonconformity would be seasonably cured, and the nonconformity was not subsequently cured.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-606(c) — 2 cases
Audio Visual Artistry v. Stephen Tanzer, 403 S.W.3d 789 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-606 . With the exception of those goods identified by the court’s order as “rejected,” there is no indication in the record that Mr.”
Moses v. Newman, 658 S.W.2d 119 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.