Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-3-414 (2026)

Obligation of drawer

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1995, ch. 397, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2021 · leading case: Lake Hiwassee Dev. Co. v. Pioneer Bank, 535 S.W.2d 323 (Tenn. 1976).
Lake Hiwassee Dev. Co. v. Pioneer Bank, 535 S.W.2d 323 (Tenn. 1976). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 47-3-414 provides: “Unless the indorsement otherwise specifies (as by such words as ‘without recourse’) every indorser engages that upon dishonor and any necessary notice of dishonor and protest he will pay the instrument according to its tenor at the time of his…”
McLemore v. Third Nat'l Bank (In Re Montgomery), 123 B.R. 801 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1991). “§ 47-4-212 (bank’s right to revoke provisional credit, to charge back the amount of any credit given and to obtain refund from its customer); TENN.”
Smallman v. Home Fed. Sav. Bank of Tennessee, 786 S.W.2d 954 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “This is not intended to say, and we are not called upon to determine whether a bank would be entitled to recover from a depositor under the statute authorizing recovery against endorsers, T.C.A. 47-3-414 [5] , but hold only that a bank which misses its midnight deadline is…”
Dobson & Johnson, Inc. v. Von Weiland, 644 S.W.2d 394 (Tenn. 1982). · cites it 2× “T.C.A., § 47-3-414(1). “As a general rule the defense of want or failure of consideration relates only to consideration for the particular contract under which obligation is asserted.”
Tom Albert v. Pat Frye (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “In a post-trial motion to alter or amend, Plaintiffs contended they were entitled to relief pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-3-414 (b) because Frye, the drawer, was obliged to pay the draft according to its terms without proof of fraud.”
Harpeth Fin. Servs., LLC v. Jim Clay Pinson, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “Morris does not elaborate on this point. In the general sessions warrant, Harpeth only references the bad check statute, Tennessee Code Annotated § 47- 29-101, and not Tennessee Code Annotated § 47-3-414, the obligation of a drawer on an unaccepted draft.”
Car Connection, Inc. v. Auto Buyers, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 47-3-414(b) provides: If an unaccepted draft is dishonored, the drawer is obligated to pay the draft in accordance with its terms at the time it was issued .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-3-414(1) — 1 case
Dobson & Johnson, Inc. v. Von Weiland, 644 S.W.2d 394 (Tenn. 1982). “T.C.A., § 47-3-414(1). “As a general rule the defense of want or failure of consideration relates only to consideration for the particular contract under which obligation is asserted.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-3-414(b) — 1 case
Car Connection, Inc. v. Auto Buyers, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “T.C.A. § 47-3-414(b) provides: If an unaccepted draft is dishonored, the drawer is obligated to pay the draft in accordance with its terms at the time it was issued .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.