Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102 (2026)

Chapter definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter:

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 749, s 1, eff. 4/22/2014.

Acts 1999, ch. 278, § 3; 2000, ch. 936, §§ 1 - 11.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2005–2011 · leading case: S & M Brands, Inc. v. Summers, 393 F. Supp. 2d 604 (M.D. Tenn. 2005).
S & M Brands, Inc. v. Summers, 393 F. Supp. 2d 604 (M.D. Tenn. 2005). · cites it 8× “A successor of an entity described in Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102 (9)(A)(i) or (ii) also is defined as a tobacco product manufacturer.”
S & M Brands, Inc. v. Summers, 420 F. Supp. 2d 840 (M.D. Tenn. 2006). · cites it 3× “Defendant argues that ITP does not have standing to bring that claim because it is not a “tobacco product manufacturer” as that term is defined by Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-31-102(9). ITP has filed its response in opposition to Defendant’s motion (Doc.”
State of Tennessee, by & through Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney Gen. & Reporter for the State of Tennessee v. NV Sumatra Tobacco Trading Co. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 11× “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 47-31-102 (2) and 103(a)(2)(A).”
State of Tennessee, et a. v. Centurion Industria e Comercio de Cigarros, L.T.D. A. & Tantus Tobacco, L.L.C. v. State of Tennesse (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “The escrow deposit must be placed in a qualified escrow fund, as defined by Tennessee Code Annotated Section 47-31-102(6), by April 15 of the year following the applicable sales year.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102(6) — 1 case
State of Tennessee, et a. v. Centurion Industria e Comercio de Cigarros, L.T.D. A. & Tantus Tobacco, L.L.C. v. State of Tennesse (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “The escrow deposit must be placed in a qualified escrow fund, as defined by Tennessee Code Annotated Section 47-31-102(6), by April 15 of the year following the applicable sales year.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102(9) — 1 case
S & M Brands, Inc. v. Summers, 420 F. Supp. 2d 840 (M.D. Tenn. 2006). “Defendant argues that ITP does not have standing to bring that claim because it is not a “tobacco product manufacturer” as that term is defined by Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-31-102(9). ITP has filed its response in opposition to Defendant’s motion (Doc.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102(9)(A) — 2 cases
S & M Brands, Inc. v. Summers, 393 F. Supp. 2d 604 (M.D. Tenn. 2005). “A successor of an entity described in Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102 (9)(A)(i) or (ii) also is defined as a tobacco product manufacturer.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102(9)(A)(i) — 2 cases
S & M Brands, Inc. v. Summers, 393 F. Supp. 2d 604 (M.D. Tenn. 2005). “A successor of an entity described in Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102 (9)(A)(i) or (ii) also is defined as a tobacco product manufacturer.”
S & M Brands, Inc. v. Summers, 420 F. Supp. 2d 840 (M.D. Tenn. 2006). “Defendant argues that ITP does not have standing to bring that claim because it is not a “tobacco product manufacturer” as that term is defined by Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-31-102(9). ITP has filed its response in opposition to Defendant’s motion (Doc.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102(9)(A)(iii) — 1 case
S & M Brands, Inc. v. Summers, 393 F. Supp. 2d 604 (M.D. Tenn. 2005). “A successor of an entity described in Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-31-102 (9)(A)(i) or (ii) also is defined as a tobacco product manufacturer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.