Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401 (2026)

Suspension of students - Expulsion of students - Exception for self-defense

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 915,s 1, eff. 5/3/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 882,s 2, eff. 5/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 882,s 1, eff. 5/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 299, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 686, s 17, eff. 3/28/2022.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 64, s 89, eff. 3/29/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 345, s 104, eff. 5/10/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 958, s 4, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 501, s 2, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 182, s 50, eff. 4/17/2015.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 442, s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 222, s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 214, s 4, eff. 4/23/2013.

Acts 1925, ch. 115, § 8; Shan. Supp., § 1487a52; Code 1932, § 2341; Acts 1959, ch. 94, § 1; 1970, ch. 344, § 1; 1970, ch. 580, § 1; 1974, ch. 654, § 69; 1981, ch. 117, §§ 1-7; 1982, ch. 608, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 49-1309; Acts 1986, ch. 671, § 1; 1988, ch. 646, § 1; 1991, ch. 382, §§ 1, 2; 1991, ch. 411, § 1; 1992, ch. 949, § 1; 1993, ch. 383, § 1; 1995, ch. 268, § 1; 1995, ch. 365, § 1; 1998, ch. 830, § 1; 2000, ch. 634, § 3; 2007 , ch. 212, § 1; 2007 , ch. 402, § 1; 2007 , ch. 457, § 1; 2008 , ch. 916, § 1; 2011 , ch. 410, § 4 (v); 2012 , ch. 687, § 1; 2012 , ch. 848, § 42.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: Christian Heyne v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ., 380 S.W.3d 715 (Tenn. 2012).
Christian Heyne v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ., 380 S.W.3d 715 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 11× “2011) (empowering local boards of education to suspend or dismiss pupils when the progress, safety, or efficiency of the school makes it necessary or when disruptive, threatening, or violent students endanger the safety of other students or school system employees); Tenn.Code…”
Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart, 445 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. Tenn. 2006). · cites it 14× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-6-3401, 49-6-4216. Broadly, certain school officials are permitted to suspend a student from school attendance for “good and sufficient reasons,” including “possession of a knife .”
Nixon ex rel. A.N. v. Hardin Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 988 F. Supp. 2d 826 (W.D. Tenn. 2013). · cites it 5× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(a). "Good and sufficient reasons for suspension include .”
Christine Heyne v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 14× “We begin our analysis of this issue with a review of Tennessee’s statutory scheme pertaining to suspension of public school students, as set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401 , et seq., followed by an analysis of the due process rights of a student who receives a so-called…”
Doe v. Washington Cnty. Dep't of Educ. (E.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 8× “Defendant further asserts that any claim brought under Tennessee Code Annotated § 49-6-3401 or other state statute or state common law applying to issues such as those raised by Plaintiff must be brought within sixty days of the disputed action via a writ of certiorari; thus,…”
Smith v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. of Sch. Commissioners, 641 F.3d 197 (6th Cir. 2011). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401 (2009). Such students may be in an alternative school for as little as a few days, hardly enough time to develop anything like a “close relationship.”
John Doe, a minor, by & through his parent & guardian, Mary Doe v. Marion Cnty. Sch. Dist. & Marion Cnty., Tennessee (E.D. Tenn. 2025). · cites it 5× “” § 49-6-3401(a)(3), (12), (13). If a principal determines “an offense has been committed that would justify a suspension for more than ten (10) days,” a principal “may suspend a student.”
Ralph Newcomb & Jessica Newcomb, as next friends for B.N.; Todd Mathis & Lesley Mathis, as next friends for H.M. v. (M.D. Tenn. 2026). · cites it 5× “299 § 1 (adding Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401 (g)(2)(D) (2023)).”
Quentin Link, a Minor, by Next Friend & Legal Guardian v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 8× “Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401 (b)(6), the board is authorized to “grant or deny a request for a board hearing and may affirm or overturn the decision of the hearing authority with or without a hearing before the board.”
Haley Mariah Anderson v. Paul E. Stanton, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 6× “While we agree with the assertion that “minimum due process was required,” the Children are mistaken in their assertion that Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401 applies in this case.”
C.S.C. v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “The legislature has also determined that suspended or expelled students may receive instruction at an alternative school. See T.C.A. § 49-6-3402. These alternative schools are different from regular public schools.”
State v. Morgan, 271 S.W.3d 217 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “§ 6-54-306 and T.C.A. § 49-6-3401. T.C.A. § 6-54-306 addresses police authority and penalties allowable for violations of certain municipal ordinances.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(a) — 2 cases
Christian Heyne v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ., 380 S.W.3d 715 (Tenn. 2012). “2011) (empowering local boards of education to suspend or dismiss pupils when the progress, safety, or efficiency of the school makes it necessary or when disruptive, threatening, or violent students endanger the safety of other students or school system employees); Tenn.Code…”
Nixon ex rel. A.N. v. Hardin Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 988 F. Supp. 2d 826 (W.D. Tenn. 2013). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(a). "Good and sufficient reasons for suspension include .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(a)(3) — 1 case
John Doe, a minor, by & through his parent & guardian, Mary Doe v. Marion Cnty. Sch. Dist. & Marion Cnty., Tennessee (E.D. Tenn. 2025). “” § 49-6-3401(a)(3), (12), (13). If a principal determines “an offense has been committed that would justify a suspension for more than ten (10) days,” a principal “may suspend a student.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(a)(8) — 1 case
Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart, 445 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. Tenn. 2006). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-6-3401, 49-6-4216. Broadly, certain school officials are permitted to suspend a student from school attendance for “good and sufficient reasons,” including “possession of a knife .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(c) — 3 cases
Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart, 445 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. Tenn. 2006). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-6-3401, 49-6-4216. Broadly, certain school officials are permitted to suspend a student from school attendance for “good and sufficient reasons,” including “possession of a knife .”
C.S.C. v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “The legislature has also determined that suspended or expelled students may receive instruction at an alternative school. See T.C.A. § 49-6-3402. These alternative schools are different from regular public schools.”
John Doe, a minor, by & through his parent & guardian, Mary Doe v. Marion Cnty. Sch. Dist. & Marion Cnty., Tennessee (E.D. Tenn. 2025). “” § 49-6-3401(a)(3), (12), (13). If a principal determines “an offense has been committed that would justify a suspension for more than ten (10) days,” a principal “may suspend a student.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(c)(2) — 1 case
Christian Heyne v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ., 380 S.W.3d 715 (Tenn. 2012). “2011) (empowering local boards of education to suspend or dismiss pupils when the progress, safety, or efficiency of the school makes it necessary or when disruptive, threatening, or violent students endanger the safety of other students or school system employees); Tenn.Code…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(c)(4) — 2 cases
Christian Heyne v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ., 380 S.W.3d 715 (Tenn. 2012). “2011) (empowering local boards of education to suspend or dismiss pupils when the progress, safety, or efficiency of the school makes it necessary or when disruptive, threatening, or violent students endanger the safety of other students or school system employees); Tenn.Code…”
Doe v. Washington Cnty. Dep't of Educ. (E.D. Tenn. 2020). “Defendant further asserts that any claim brought under Tennessee Code Annotated § 49-6-3401 or other state statute or state common law applying to issues such as those raised by Plaintiff must be brought within sixty days of the disputed action via a writ of certiorari; thus,…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(c)(4)(A) — 1 case
Christian Heyne v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ., 380 S.W.3d 715 (Tenn. 2012). “2011) (empowering local boards of education to suspend or dismiss pupils when the progress, safety, or efficiency of the school makes it necessary or when disruptive, threatening, or violent students endanger the safety of other students or school system employees); Tenn.Code…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(c)(4)(B) — 2 cases
Christian Heyne v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ., 380 S.W.3d 715 (Tenn. 2012). “2011) (empowering local boards of education to suspend or dismiss pupils when the progress, safety, or efficiency of the school makes it necessary or when disruptive, threatening, or violent students endanger the safety of other students or school system employees); Tenn.Code…”
Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart, 445 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. Tenn. 2006). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-6-3401, 49-6-4216. Broadly, certain school officials are permitted to suspend a student from school attendance for “good and sufficient reasons,” including “possession of a knife .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(c)(4)(D) — 1 case
Doe v. Washington Cnty. Dep't of Educ. (E.D. Tenn. 2020). “Defendant further asserts that any claim brought under Tennessee Code Annotated § 49-6-3401 or other state statute or state common law applying to issues such as those raised by Plaintiff must be brought within sixty days of the disputed action via a writ of certiorari; thus,…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(c)(6) — 2 cases
Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart, 445 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. Tenn. 2006). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-6-3401, 49-6-4216. Broadly, certain school officials are permitted to suspend a student from school attendance for “good and sufficient reasons,” including “possession of a knife .”
Doe v. Washington Cnty. Dep't of Educ. (E.D. Tenn. 2020). “Defendant further asserts that any claim brought under Tennessee Code Annotated § 49-6-3401 or other state statute or state common law applying to issues such as those raised by Plaintiff must be brought within sixty days of the disputed action via a writ of certiorari; thus,…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(c)(l) — 1 case
Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart, 445 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. Tenn. 2006). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-6-3401, 49-6-4216. Broadly, certain school officials are permitted to suspend a student from school attendance for “good and sufficient reasons,” including “possession of a knife .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(e)(4)(C) — 1 case
Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart, 445 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. Tenn. 2006). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-6-3401, 49-6-4216. Broadly, certain school officials are permitted to suspend a student from school attendance for “good and sufficient reasons,” including “possession of a knife .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(g) — 4 cases
Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart, 445 F. Supp. 2d 882 (E.D. Tenn. 2006). “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-6-3401, 49-6-4216. Broadly, certain school officials are permitted to suspend a student from school attendance for “good and sufficient reasons,” including “possession of a knife .”
John Doe, a minor, by & through his parent & guardian, Mary Doe v. Marion Cnty. Sch. Dist. & Marion Cnty., Tennessee (E.D. Tenn. 2025). “” § 49-6-3401(a)(3), (12), (13). If a principal determines “an offense has been committed that would justify a suspension for more than ten (10) days,” a principal “may suspend a student.”
Quentin Link, a Minor, by Next Friend & Legal Guardian v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401 (b)(6), the board is authorized to “grant or deny a request for a board hearing and may affirm or overturn the decision of the hearing authority with or without a hearing before the board.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(g)(6)(B) — 1 case
Ralph Newcomb & Jessica Newcomb, as next friends for B.N.; Todd Mathis & Lesley Mathis, as next friends for H.M. v. (M.D. Tenn. 2026). “299 § 1 (adding Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401 (g)(2)(D) (2023)).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-6-3401(h) — 1 case
Christian Heyne v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ., 380 S.W.3d 715 (Tenn. 2012). “2011) (empowering local boards of education to suspend or dismiss pupils when the progress, safety, or efficiency of the school makes it necessary or when disruptive, threatening, or violent students endanger the safety of other students or school system employees); Tenn.Code…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.