Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-14-108 (2026)

Disposal of obsolete or unusable county property - Bidding, auctions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 513,s 1, eff. 3/1/2024.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 162, s 1, eff. 4/16/2013.

Acts 1957, ch. 312, § 7; 1963, ch. 367, § 1; 1975, ch. 53, § 1; 1977, ch. 119, §§ 1, 2; 1977, ch. 288, § 1; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 7, 22, 36; modified; T.C.A., § 5-1408; Acts 1984, ch. 604, § 1; 1984, ch. 647, §§ 2-5; 1984, ch. 822, § 1; 1984, ch. 895, §§ 1, 2; 1988, ch. 770, §§ 1, 2; 1995, ch. 179, § 1; 2004, ch. 500, § 1; 2006, ch. 509, § 1; 2007 , ch. 122, § 1; 2007 , ch. 135, § 1; 2007 , ch. 415, § 1; 2009 , ch. 173, §§ 1, 2; 2010 , ch. 974, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1981–2020 · leading case: State v. Harris, 844 S.W.2d 601 (Tenn. 1992).
State v. Harris, 844 S.W.2d 601 (Tenn. 1992). “§§ 5-14-108, Sexual abuse in the 3-10 years 5-4-401 first degree Cal.”
State ex rel. Leech v. Wright, 622 S.W.2d 807 (Tenn. 1981). · cites it 2× “Thus, we hold that the minimum requirements for complying with the private act applicable to defendant are as follows: notification to interested bidders by a method designed to reach bidders likely to be interested, either by direct mail, newspaper advertising, posting of…”
Robert Bushnell v. Bedford Cnty., TN, 432 F. App'x 472 (6th Cir. 2011). “Two of them, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 5-14-108 and 47-50-109, are not criminal statutes and thus cannot constitute RICO predicate offenses.”
Thompson v. Comm'r, 45 T.C.M. 693 (Tax Ct. 1983). · cites it 4× “§ 5-10-501 , and § 5-14-108(m) , respondent argues that acquisitions of major road building equipment are "capital outlay expenditures" that must be approved by the county legislative body if the purchases are to be made by any form of contract which would bear interest, and…”
Pamela Cotham v. Nicholas Jay Yeager (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 3× “” See Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-14-108 (j). Ms. Cotham’s assertions regarding the Purchasing Act’s applicability focus on the initial portion of the first sentence in Tennessee Code Annotated § 5-14-105(1), which states that the county purchasing agent has the exclusive power to…”
Waste Servs. of Decatur, LLC v. Cnty. of Lawrence (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “Based upon the nature of the services being procured and the language of Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-14-108 (a)(1), we conclude that the County did not act illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently in opting to use the RFP process.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-14-108(a)(1) — 2 cases
Pamela Cotham v. Nicholas Jay Yeager (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “” See Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-14-108 (j). Ms. Cotham’s assertions regarding the Purchasing Act’s applicability focus on the initial portion of the first sentence in Tennessee Code Annotated § 5-14-105(1), which states that the county purchasing agent has the exclusive power to…”
Waste Servs. of Decatur, LLC v. Cnty. of Lawrence (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “Based upon the nature of the services being procured and the language of Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-14-108 (a)(1), we conclude that the County did not act illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently in opting to use the RFP process.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.