Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (2026)
Injuries not covered - Drug and alcohol testing
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) No compensation shall be allowed for an injury or death due to:
- (1) The employee's willful misconduct;
- (2) The employee's intentional self-inflicted injury;
- (3) The employee's intoxication or illegal drug usage;
- (4) The employee's willful failure or refusal to use a safety device;
- (5) The employee's willful failure to perform a duty required by law; or
- (6) The employee's voluntary participation in recreational, social, athletic or exercise activities, including, but not limited to, athletic events, competitions, parties, picnics, or exercise programs, whether or not the employer pays some or all of the costs of the activities unless:
- (A) Participation was expressly or impliedly required by the employer;
- (B) Participation produced a direct benefit to the employer beyond improvement in employee health and morale;
- (C) Participation was during employee's work hours and was part of the employee's work-related duties; or
- (D) The injury occurred due to an unsafe condition during voluntary participation using facilities designated by, furnished by or maintained by the employer on or off the employer's premises and the employer had actual knowledge of the unsafe condition and failed to curtail the activity or program or cure the unsafe condition.
- (b) If the employer defends on the ground that the injury arose in any or all of the ways stated in subsection (a), the burden of proof shall be on the employer to establish the defense.
- (c)
- (1) In cases where the employer has implemented a drug-free workplace pursuant to chapter 9 of this title, if the injured employee has, at the time of the injury, a blood alcohol concentration level equal to or greater than eight-hundredths of one percent (0.08%) for non-safety sensitive positions, or four-hundredths of one percent (0.04%) for safety-sensitive positions, as determined by blood or breath testing, or if the injured employee has a positive confirmation of a drug as defined in § 50-9-103, then it is presumed that the drug or alcohol was the proximate cause of the injury. This presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that the drug or alcohol was not the proximate cause of injury. Percent by weight of alcohol in the blood must be based upon grams of alcohol per one hundred milliliters (100 mL) of blood. If the results are positive, the testing facility must maintain the specimen for a minimum of three hundred sixty-five (365) days at minus twenty degrees celsius (-20° C.). Blood serum may be used for testing purposes under this chapter; provided, however, that if this test is used, the presumptions under this section do not arise unless the blood alcohol level is proved to be medically and scientifically equivalent to or greater than the comparable blood alcohol level that would have been obtained if the test were based on percent by weight of alcohol in the blood. However, if, before the accident, the employer had actual knowledge of and acquiesced in the employee's presence at the workplace while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, the employer retains the burden of proof in asserting any defense under subsections (a) and (b), and this subsection (c) does not apply.
- (2) If the injured worker refuses to submit to a drug test, it shall be presumed, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, that the proximate cause of the injury was the influence of drugs, as defined in § 50-9-103.
- (3) The administrator of the bureau of workers' compensation shall provide, by rule, for the authorization and regulation of drug testing policies, procedures and methods. Testing of injured employees pursuant to a drug-free workplace program under chapter 9 of this title shall not commence until the rules are adopted.
Acts 1919, ch. 123, § 10; Shan. Supp., § 3608a159; Code 1932, § 6861; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 50-910; Acts 1994, ch. 765, § 1; 1996, ch. 944, § 49; 1999, ch. 520, § 41; 2005, ch. 390, § 1; 2009, ch. 407, § 1; 2011, ch. 203, §§ 1, 2; 2013, ch. 282, § 1; 2015, ch. 341, § 15.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 98
cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: Troy Mitchell v. Fayetteville Pub. Utils., 368 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2012).
Troy Mitchell v. Fayetteville Pub. Utils., 368 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2012). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (b); Coleman v.”
Interstate Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. McIntosh, 229 S.W.3d 674 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (b); Dobbs v. Liberty Mut.”
Nance v. State Indus., Inc., 33 S.W.3d 222 (Tenn. 2000). “The employee contends that the trial court erred in finding that the employee’s conduct amounted to a willful failure or refusal to use a safety appliance pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a). To clarify this area of workers’ compensation law, the panel adopts a new standard…”
Rogers v. Kroger Co., 832 S.W.2d 538 (Tenn. 1992). “The court concluded that Rogers was in violation of Kroger’s safety rules by engaging in intentional horseplay, which was the proximate cause of her injury, and constituted willful misconduct under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (a); and accordingly, Rogers was not entitled to…”
Bryan v. Paramount Packaging Corp., 677 S.W.2d 453 (Tenn. 1984). “In this worker’s compensation case the trial court denied benefits on the ground that the plaintiff’s injury was due to his willful misconduct; recovery was barred under the provisions of T.C.A., § 50-6-110, which provides: “(a) No compensation shall be allowed for an injury or…”
Flowers v. Norman Oaks Constr. Co., 17 S.W.3d 472 (Ark. 2000). “, Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (1999 Repl.); Va.”
Loy v. North Bros. Co., 787 S.W.2d 916 (Tenn. 1990). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-110. This Court has held that “willful misconduct within the meaning of the statute means something more than mere negligence and carries the idea of deliberation and intentional wrongdoing.”
Hall v. Mason Dixon Lines, Inc., 743 S.W.2d 148 (Tenn. 1987). “” T.C.A. § 50-6-110(a). As a corollary, if the injury does not arise out of and in the course of employment, worker’s compensation liability cannot be imposed upon the employer no matter how laudable in character the act of the injured employee.”
Heritage Mut. Ins. Co. v. Larsen, 2001 WI 30 (Wis. 2001). “, Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (a) (2000) (denying compensation where injury is due to intoxication); Ohio Rev.”
Dobbs v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 811 S.W.2d 75 (Tenn. 1991). “” Tennessee Code Annotated, § 50-6-110, states: (a) No compensation shall be allowed for an injury or death due to the employee's willful misconduct or intentional self-inflicted injury, or due to intoxication, or willful failure or refusal to use a safety appliance or perform a…”
Polk, Ricky v. Delta Faucet, 2018 TN WC App. 43 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2018). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (c)(1). This presumption is not conclusive, however, and may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that the employee’s intoxication or drug use was not the proximate cause of the injury.”
Pope, Gregory v. Nebco of Cleveland, Inc. d/b/a Toyota of Cleveland, 2016 TN WC 130 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016). “Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 50-6-110, is amended by deleting subsection (a) in its entirety and substituting instead the following: (a) No compensation shall be allowed for an injury or death due to: (1) The employee's willful misconduct; (2) The employee's intentional…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(6) — 1 case
Pope, Gregory v. Nebco of Cleveland, Inc. d/b/a Toyota of Cleveland, 2016 TN WC 130 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016). “Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 50-6-110, is amended by deleting subsection (a) in its entirety and substituting instead the following: (a) No compensation shall be allowed for an injury or death due to: (1) The employee's willful misconduct; (2) The employee's intentional…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a) — 23 cases
Troy Mitchell v. Fayetteville Pub. Utils., 368 S.W.3d 442 (Tenn. 2012). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (b); Coleman v.”
Interstate Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. McIntosh, 229 S.W.3d 674 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (b); Dobbs v. Liberty Mut.”
Nance v. State Indus., Inc., 33 S.W.3d 222 (Tenn. 2000). “The employee contends that the trial court erred in finding that the employee’s conduct amounted to a willful failure or refusal to use a safety appliance pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a). To clarify this area of workers’ compensation law, the panel adopts a new standard…”
Rogers v. Kroger Co., 832 S.W.2d 538 (Tenn. 1992). “The court concluded that Rogers was in violation of Kroger’s safety rules by engaging in intentional horseplay, which was the proximate cause of her injury, and constituted willful misconduct under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (a); and accordingly, Rogers was not entitled to…”
Hall v. Mason Dixon Lines, Inc., 743 S.W.2d 148 (Tenn. 1987). “” T.C.A. § 50-6-110(a). As a corollary, if the injury does not arise out of and in the course of employment, worker’s compensation liability cannot be imposed upon the employer no matter how laudable in character the act of the injured employee.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(1) — 13 cases
Iboy, Olga Esperanza v. Kenten Mgmt.< LLC, 2018 TN WC App. 21 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2018).
Glasgow, Jack v. 31-W Insulation Co., Inc., 2017 TN WC App. 50 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2017).
Ventura, Valdez v. Ccon Metals USA, Inc., 2018 TN WC 90 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2018).
Hardin, Gregory v. W.A. Kendall & Co., Inc., 2019 TN WC App. 23 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2019).
Johnson, Frederick v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2019 TN WC 140 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2019).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(1999) — 1 case
Nance v. State Indus., Inc., 33 S.W.3d 222 (Tenn. 2000). “The employee contends that the trial court erred in finding that the employee’s conduct amounted to a willful failure or refusal to use a safety appliance pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a). To clarify this area of workers’ compensation law, the panel adopts a new standard…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(2014) — 1 case
Barrett, Buster v. Lithko Contracting, Inc., 2016 TN WC 115 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(3) — 11 cases
Green, Linda v. Rogers Grp., 2016 TN WC 259 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016).
Green, Linda v. Rogers Grp., 2017 TN WC 27 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
Bowlin, Nicole v. Servall Pest Control, 2017 TN WC 182 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
Ellis, John v. A AIR-One, 2015 TN WC 29 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2015).
Ellis, John v. A Air-One Serv., 2015 TN WC App. 9 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(4) — 9 cases
Johnson, Garry Wayne v. Alloy Fabrication, Inc., 2016 TN WC 254 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016).
Glasgow, Jack v. 31W insulation Co Inc., 2017 TN WC 130 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
Burnette, Jay v. Builders Transportaton, 2017 TN WC 190 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
Burnett, Jay. Builders Transp., 2017 TN WC 196 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
Ogelsby, Edward v, United Parcel Serv., Inc., 2018 TN WC 60 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(5) — 2 cases
Butler, Larry v. AAA Cooper Transp., 2017 TN WC App. 52 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2017).
Butler, Larry v. AAA Cooper Transp., 2017 TN WC 114 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(6) — 2 cases
Pope, Gregory v. Nebco of Cleveland, Inc. d/b/a Toyota of Cleveland, 2016 TN WC 130 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016). “Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 50-6-110, is amended by deleting subsection (a) in its entirety and substituting instead the following: (a) No compensation shall be allowed for an injury or death due to: (1) The employee's willful misconduct; (2) The employee's intentional…”
Pope, Gregory v. Nebco of Cleveland, Inc., d/b/a Toyota of Cleveland, 2016 TN WC App. 65 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(6)(A) — 1 case
Pope, Gregory v. Nebco of Cleveland, Inc., d/b/a Toyota of Cleveland, 2016 TN WC App. 65 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(6)(C) — 1 case
Pope, Gregory v. Nebco of Cleveland, Inc., d/b/a Toyota of Cleveland, 2016 TN WC App. 65 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a)(l) — 2 cases
Johnson, Garry Wayne v. Alloy Fabrication, Inc., 2016 TN WC 254 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016).
Resto, Wilfredo v. Chattanooga Bakery, Inc., 2017 TN WC 108 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(b) — 14 cases
Nance v. State Indus., Inc., 33 S.W.3d 222 (Tenn. 2000). “The employee contends that the trial court erred in finding that the employee’s conduct amounted to a willful failure or refusal to use a safety appliance pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-110(a). To clarify this area of workers’ compensation law, the panel adopts a new standard…”
Iboy, Olga Esperanza v. Kenten Mgmt.< LLC, 2018 TN WC App. 21 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2018).
Dockery, James v. Morristown Distrib. Servs., Inc., 2017 TN WC 45 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
Kidd, Terry v. LSO Holding Corp., 2017 TN WC 147 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
Burnett, Jay v. Builders Transp., 2018 TN WC App. 5 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(c) — 3 cases
Kizer, Jared v. Express Servs., Inc., 2018 TN WC App. 15 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2018).
Ballew, Richard v. Shomaker Lumber Co., Inc., 2015 TN WC 159 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2015).
Green, Linda v. Rogers Grp., 2016 TN WC 259 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(c)(1) — 10 cases
Bowlin, Nicole v. Servall, LLC, 2018 TN WC App. 6 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2018).
Green, Linda v. Rogers Grp., 2016 TN WC App. 70 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2016).
Green, Linda v. Rogers Grp., 2017 TN WC 27 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
Kizer, Jared v. Express Servs., Inc., 2018 TN WC App. 15 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2018).
Polk, Ricky v. Delta Faucet, 2018 TN WC App. 43 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2018). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (c)(1). This presumption is not conclusive, however, and may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that the employee’s intoxication or drug use was not the proximate cause of the injury.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(c)(2) — 2 cases
Polk, Ricky v. Delta Faucet, 2018 TN WC App. 43 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2018). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (c)(1). This presumption is not conclusive, however, and may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that the employee’s intoxication or drug use was not the proximate cause of the injury.”
Morgan, Deborah v. Beall Mfg., Inc., 2020 TN WC 124 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(c)(3) — 1 case
Green, Linda v. Rogers Grp., 2017 TN WC 27 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110(c)(l) — 1 case
Interstate Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. McIntosh, 229 S.W.3d 674 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-110 (b); Dobbs v. Liberty Mut.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.