Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451 (2026)

Goods subject to forfeiture - Seizure - Disposition

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 423, s 4, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 423, s 3, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 423, s 2, eff. 7/1/2024.

Acts 1971, ch. 163, § 36; 1972, ch. 597, § 12; 1973, ch. 134, § 1; 1981, ch. 512, § 2; 1982, ch. 742, § 1; T.C.A., § 52-1443; Acts 1983, ch. 412, § 4; 1984, ch. 1005, § 4; 1986, ch. 783, § 1; 1989, ch. 192, § 1; T.C.A., § 53-11-409; Acts 1994, ch. 925, § 2; 2007 , ch. 106, §§ 7-9; 2010 , ch. 1040, §§ 6-8; 2012 , ch. 848, §§ 48, 49.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1992–2022 · leading case: Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 14× “In 1983, it was transferred and redesignated as Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-409, and in 1990 it was again transferred and redesignated as Tenn.”
Helms v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf., 987 S.W.2d 545 (Tenn. 1999). · cites it 10× “We granted this appeal to determine if Article I, section 6 of the Tennessee Constitution affords the right to a jury trial in cases under Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451 (Supp.1992), involving the forfeiture of personal property.”
Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Comm'r of Revenue for the State of Tennessee, 291 S.W.3d 873 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 53-11-201, -204 (2008) and Tenn.”
Payne v. Breuer, 891 S.W.2d 200 (Tenn. 1994). · cites it 6× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(6)(A) authorizes the seizure of “[ejverything of value furnished, or intended to be furnished, in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act .”
State v. Phillips, 138 S.W.3d 224 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “§ 39-11-703(a) (2003); Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(6)(A) (1999).”
Watson v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf., 361 S.W.3d 549 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 3× “Rather, Watson’s property was seized based on the allegation that the property was procured in exchange for a controlled substance or with proceeds traceable to such an exchange, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 53-11-451. Therefore, we agree with the trial court that both…”
McEwen v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf., 173 S.W.3d 815 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “§ 53-11-451(a)(6)(A). If the State failed to make *825 out a prima facie case, the forfeiture of this property is barred, and the property must be returned immediately.”
State v. Blackmon, 78 S.W.3d 322 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “Tennessee Code Annotated § 53-11-451(d)(4) provides a method whereby police can be granted judicial authorization to use property which they have seized.”
Stuart v. State of Tennessee Dept. of Saf., 963 S.W.2d 28 (Tenn. 1998). · cites it 2× “Under Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(4)(C)(Supp.”
Ally Fin. v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf. & Homeland Sec., 530 S.W.3d 659 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Background On March 18, 2014, the Shelby County Multi Agency Gang Unit (“MAGU”) seized a 2008 Dodge Challenger CS8 (“the'vehicle”) from its owner,"Jacqueline Chambers, as drug-related proceeds subject to forfeiture under Tennessee Code Annotated section 53-11-451. 1…”
State v. Blackmon, 984 S.W.2d 589 (Tenn. 1998). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451 (1991 & Supp. 1997).”
Hill v. State of Tenn., 868 F. Supp. 221 (M.D. Tenn. 1994). · cites it 4× “The officers also seized Plaintiffs 1989 Chevrolet Suburban pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451. 1 Upon completion of the forfeiture *223 hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that the vehicle should be forfeited to the seizing municipality, Metro.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a) — 2 cases
Pinnix v. Pollock, 338 F. Supp. 2d 885 (W.D. Tenn. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(2) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(4) — 4 cases
Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “In 1983, it was transferred and redesignated as Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-409, and in 1990 it was again transferred and redesignated as Tenn.”
Hill v. State of Tenn., 868 F. Supp. 221 (M.D. Tenn. 1994). “The officers also seized Plaintiffs 1989 Chevrolet Suburban pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451. 1 Upon completion of the forfeiture *223 hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that the vehicle should be forfeited to the seizing municipality, Metro.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(4)(C) — 2 cases
Stuart v. State of Tennessee Dept. of Saf., 963 S.W.2d 28 (Tenn. 1998). “Under Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(4)(C)(Supp.”
Hill v. Lawson, 851 S.W.2d 822 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(6) — 2 cases
Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “In 1983, it was transferred and redesignated as Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-409, and in 1990 it was again transferred and redesignated as Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(6)(A) — 9 cases
State v. Phillips, 138 S.W.3d 224 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “§ 39-11-703(a) (2003); Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(6)(A) (1999).”
McEwen v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf., 173 S.W.3d 815 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “§ 53-11-451(a)(6)(A). If the State failed to make *825 out a prima facie case, the forfeiture of this property is barred, and the property must be returned immediately.”
Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “In 1983, it was transferred and redesignated as Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-409, and in 1990 it was again transferred and redesignated as Tenn.”
Watson v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf., 361 S.W.3d 549 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “Rather, Watson’s property was seized based on the allegation that the property was procured in exchange for a controlled substance or with proceeds traceable to such an exchange, pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 53-11-451. Therefore, we agree with the trial court that both…”
Payne v. Breuer, 891 S.W.2d 200 (Tenn. 1994). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(6)(A) authorizes the seizure of “[ejverything of value furnished, or intended to be furnished, in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(7) — 1 case
Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “In 1983, it was transferred and redesignated as Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-409, and in 1990 it was again transferred and redesignated as Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(b) — 2 cases
Payne v. Breuer, 891 S.W.2d 200 (Tenn. 1994). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(6)(A) authorizes the seizure of “[ejverything of value furnished, or intended to be furnished, in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(b)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(b)(4) — 2 cases
Payne v. Breuer, 891 S.W.2d 200 (Tenn. 1994). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-451(a)(6)(A) authorizes the seizure of “[ejverything of value furnished, or intended to be furnished, in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(d) — 3 cases
Charles A. Harmon v. James J.J. Jones (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(d)(4) — 3 cases
State v. Blackmon, 78 S.W.3d 322 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “Tennessee Code Annotated § 53-11-451(d)(4) provides a method whereby police can be granted judicial authorization to use property which they have seized.”
Jones v. Greene, 946 S.W.2d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “In 1983, it was transferred and redesignated as Tenn.Code Ann. § 53-11-409, and in 1990 it was again transferred and redesignated as Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(d)(4)(1991) — 1 case
United States v. Daniel E. Pipes, 87 F.3d 840 (6th Cir. 1996).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 53-11-451(i) — 1 case
Charles A. Harmon v. James J.J. Jones (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.