Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502 (2026)

Suspension of licenses - Hearings - Period of suspension or revocation - Surrender of license - Restricted license - Operating under license of another jurisdiction prohibited - Appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 878, s 6, eff. 4/14/2022.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 438, Secs.s 2, s 3 eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 438, s 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 876, s 11, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 587, s 6, eff. 7/1/2014.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 344, s 19, eff. 5/13/2013.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 154, s 48, Sec.s 52 eff. 7/1/2013.

Acts 1937, ch. 90, § 12; impl. am. Acts 1939, ch. 205, §§ 2, 3; Acts 1939, ch. 205, § 6; 1949, ch. 65, § 1; C. Supp. 1950, § 2715.20 (Williams, § 2715.25); Acts 1955, ch. 114, §§ 6-9; 1957, ch. 241, §§ 2, 3; 1971, ch. 135, § 1; 1971, ch. 243, § 1; 1973, ch. 64, § 1; 1973, ch. 319, § 1; 1975, ch. 238, § 1; 1976, ch. 450, § 1; 1976, ch. 570, § 1; 1976, ch. 607, § 1; 1978, ch. 660, §§ 2, 3; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 59-713; Acts 1980, ch. 547, § 1; 1980, ch. 685, §§ 1, 2; 1980, ch. 817, § 3; 1982, ch. 745, § 1; 1984, ch. 861, §§ 1, 2; 1986, ch. 738, § 3; 1986, ch. 842, §§ 3, 4; 1988, ch. 584, § 11; 1988, ch. 664, § 1; T.C.A., §§ 55-7-113, 55-7-502; Acts 1989, ch. 156, § 1; 1990, ch. 819, § 4; 1991, ch. 296, § 1; 1995, ch. 156, § 1; 1996, ch. 763, § 3; 1997 , ch. 438, §§ 1, 2; 1998, ch. 682, § 6; 1998, ch. 900, § 1; 1999, ch. 140, §§ 1 - 3; 2000, ch. 863, § 3; 2000, ch. 892, § 2; 2000, ch. 947, § 6; 2002, ch. 546, § 3; 2005, ch. 155, § 1; 2005, ch. 241, § 1; 2005, ch. 468, § 1; 2007 , ch. 171, § 2; 2007 , ch. 279, § 1; 2010 , ch. 1029, §§ 1, 2; 2010 , ch. 1100, § 89; 2011 , ch. 81, § 1; 2012 , ch. 575, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: State v. Thompson, 88 S.W.3d 611 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).
State v. Thompson, 88 S.W.3d 611 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). · cites it 8× “1 See generally Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-50-502(d)(2) (Supp.1997).”
State v. Loden, 920 S.W.2d 261 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Note, however, that Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-50-502 (1993) authorizes the Department of Safety to suspend an individual's license pending appeal.”
State v. Coleman, 455 S.E.2d 604 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502 (a) (7). Of course, these facts also demonstrate the frailty of the controlling premise in Deckard that Georgia has no power to effect revocation of a non-resident's driver's license.”
State v. Banks, 875 S.W.2d 303 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993). “statute], the trial judge is vested with the authority and discretion to allow the continued use of a restricted motor vehicle operator’s license issued in accordance with § 55-50-502 [restricted license ordered issued while D.”
State of Tennessee v. Michael Ray Swan (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). · cites it 11× “The defendant contends that in order to be found guilty of the crime, the license must first be properly suspended under the law as provided in Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502 (9). That statute provides that the Department of Safety may suspend a license upon a showing, among other…”
State of Tennessee v. Dennis Haughton Webber (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). · cites it 6× “However, the State may suspend the license of an operator when sufficient evidence shows that the operator has “failed .”
Fred Robinson v. Jeff Long (6th Cir. 2020). · cites it 3× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502 (a)(1)(H). During the pendency of this appeal, Tennessee amended Tenn.”
Marie Hawks v. Michael Greene, Comm. Dept of Saf. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 7× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-301 . A driver may lose his or her license for various reasons, and only the Department may revoke or suspend a license.”
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Gene Goodson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “This court stated that under Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502 (a)(9), the Department of Safety had the authority to suspend the defendant’s driver’s license for his failure to pay the traffic citation if the department notified him of the proposed suspension.”
Abdullah (W.D. Tenn. 2026). · cites it 2× “2024) (citing Roberts 2 Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502 (a)(1)(I) permits suspension of a license where the cited individual fails “to appear in any court or to satisfy any traffic citation issued for violating any statute regulating traffic.”
State v. Billy Thompson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “§ 55-50-502, the suspension of a nonresident’s privilege to operate a motor vehicle on the highways of this state “does not automatically spring to life at the end of the period of ineligibility, as if the order never had been entered.”
State v. Ronald Terry Wilmore (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “Thus, T.C.A.§ 55-50-502 and the state’s burden of proof established by this court’s analysis in Swan are inapplicable.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502(9) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Michael Ray Swan (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “The defendant contends that in order to be found guilty of the crime, the license must first be properly suspended under the law as provided in Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502 (9). That statute provides that the Department of Safety may suspend a license upon a showing, among other…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502(a)(1)(H) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Dennis Haughton Webber (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “However, the State may suspend the license of an operator when sufficient evidence shows that the operator has “failed .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502(a)(1)(I) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Dennis Haughton Webber (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “However, the State may suspend the license of an operator when sufficient evidence shows that the operator has “failed .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502(a)(9) — 1 case
State v. Ronald Terry Wilmore (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “Thus, T.C.A.§ 55-50-502 and the state’s burden of proof established by this court’s analysis in Swan are inapplicable.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502(d)(1) — 1 case
State v. Billy Thompson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “§ 55-50-502, the suspension of a nonresident’s privilege to operate a motor vehicle on the highways of this state “does not automatically spring to life at the end of the period of ineligibility, as if the order never had been entered.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502(d)(2) — 2 cases
State v. Thompson, 88 S.W.3d 611 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “1 See generally Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-50-502(d)(2) (Supp.1997).”
State v. Billy Thompson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “§ 55-50-502, the suspension of a nonresident’s privilege to operate a motor vehicle on the highways of this state “does not automatically spring to life at the end of the period of ineligibility, as if the order never had been entered.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502(e)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Dennis Haughton Webber (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “However, the State may suspend the license of an operator when sufficient evidence shows that the operator has “failed .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-502(e)(3) — 3 cases
State v. Thompson, 88 S.W.3d 611 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “1 See generally Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-50-502(d)(2) (Supp.1997).”
Marie Hawks v. Michael Greene, Comm. Dept of Saf. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-50-301 . A driver may lose his or her license for various reasons, and only the Department may revoke or suspend a license.”
State v. Billy Thompson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). “§ 55-50-502, the suspension of a nonresident’s privilege to operate a motor vehicle on the highways of this state “does not automatically spring to life at the end of the period of ineligibility, as if the order never had been entered.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.